Lufthansa Plane Crash
Author
Discussion

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

125,742 posts

295 months

Tuesday 27th July 2010
quotequote all
It looks like a Lufthansa MD-11 Cargo aircraft has crashed on landing at Riyadh airport. Plane broke into sections but crew seem to have survived.

thatone1967

4,252 posts

221 months

Tuesday 27th July 2010
quotequote all
PPRUNE has this:

"Lufthansa MD-11 crash landed at RUH, aircraft caught fire and split-ed in 2 half, crew reported to be safe.

Could be LH8460 from FRA which was scheduled at 0920L . It was then meant to go on to SHJ at 1050L and then further on to HKG. If all that is correct then according to Acars that would make it D-ALCQ.

ACARS mode: 1 Aircraft reg: D-ALCQ [McDonnell Douglas MD11]
Message label: ** Block id: @ Msg no: 6e4f
Flight id: LH8460 [FRA-RUH-SHJ-HKG] [Lufthansa]
Message content:-
SBS-1 Callsign: GEC8460"

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

125,742 posts

295 months

Tuesday 27th July 2010
quotequote all
Hmm - MD-11s don't like landing much, do they?

thatone1967

4,252 posts

221 months

Tuesday 27th July 2010
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Hmm - MD-11s don't like landing much, do they?
I'd rather fly in an MD11 than a DC10... I did once to Houston and was crapping myself the whole flight!!

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

125,742 posts

295 months

Tuesday 27th July 2010
quotequote all
thatone1967 said:
Eric Mc said:
Hmm - MD-11s don't like landing much, do they?
I'd rather fly in an MD11 than a DC10... I did once to Houston and was crapping myself the whole flight!!
Noy a likely choice these days.

There have been a number of incidences where a heavy landing has produced an uncontrolled bounce, followed by a rollover and complete destruction of the aircraft.
I wonder was this similar.

thatone1967

4,252 posts

221 months

Tuesday 27th July 2010
quotequote all
this is going back some (14) years... was a BA (ex Bcal) aircraft LGW - IAH...

thatone1967

4,252 posts

221 months

Tuesday 27th July 2010
quotequote all
linky here...

think they will be selling this one for spares!

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSLDE66Q10Z201007...

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

125,742 posts

295 months

Tuesday 27th July 2010
quotequote all
Piccie

Looks like its next stop will be the smelters




Ayahuasca

27,584 posts

309 months

Tuesday 27th July 2010
quotequote all
Good old DC-10/MD-11 (much the same thing) living down to its reputaion.

Here's one they made earlier:


Mastiff

2,515 posts

271 months

Tuesday 27th July 2010
quotequote all
Ayahuasca said:
Good old DC-10/MD-11 (much the same thing) living down to its reputaion.

Here's one they made earlier:

I'm assuming that did not end well...

Hugo a Gogo

23,437 posts

263 months

Tuesday 27th July 2010
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Hmm - MD-11s don't like landing much, do they?
they all land in the end, some don't take off again though

thatone1967

4,252 posts

221 months

Tuesday 27th July 2010
quotequote all
Mastiff said:
Ayahuasca said:
Good old DC-10/MD-11 (much the same thing) living down to its reputaion.

Here's one they made earlier:

I'm assuming that did not end well...
was that today's or was it the famous St Louis incident?

Ayahuasca

27,584 posts

309 months

Tuesday 27th July 2010
quotequote all
thatone1967 said:
Mastiff said:
Ayahuasca said:
Good old DC-10/MD-11 (much the same thing) living down to its reputaion.

Here's one they made earlier:

I'm assuming that did not end well...
was that today's or was it the famous St Louis incident?
Chicago, 1979, an engine fell off on takeoff.

Edited by Ayahuasca on Tuesday 27th July 13:35

munroman

1,908 posts

214 months

Tuesday 27th July 2010
quotequote all
Apparently there was a fire in the lower hold, Captain had declared an emergency, the plane had the Fire Service waiting on it but it was too late.

Glad no one hurt!

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

125,742 posts

295 months

Tuesday 27th July 2010
quotequote all
Mastiff said:
Ayahuasca said:
Good old DC-10/MD-11 (much the same thing) living down to its reputaion.

Here's one they made earlier:

I'm assuming that did not end well...
No one survived - still the largest loss of life in a civil aircrash on US soil.

bob1179

14,139 posts

239 months

Tuesday 27th July 2010
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Mastiff said:
Ayahuasca said:
Good old DC-10/MD-11 (much the same thing) living down to its reputaion.

Here's one they made earlier:

I'm assuming that did not end well...
No one survived - still the largest loss of life in a civil aircrash on US soil.
This wasn't really the fault of the aircraft though. It was caused by shoddy maintenance practice during engine fit up causing fractures in the bolts that attach the engine to the pylon. As the pilot applied full thrust to the engines during take off, the bolts failed causing the engine to go up over the top of the wing.

The DC-10 was rotating at the time and the pilot had no choice but to take off and try to go around, unfortunately the aircraft was virtually impossible to fly due to hydraulic loss and damage to the flying and control surfaces.


Joecooool

1,020 posts

258 months

Tuesday 27th July 2010
quotequote all
Its actually a very safe aircraft when properly operated and maintained. The only passenger MD 11 that ever crashed was the result of the air carrier installing an in flight entertainment system that caught fire.

Here is the history of incidents with the plane -

China Eastern Flight 583, a MD-11 went into severe oscillations on April 6, 1993 when a crew member accidentally deployed the slats during cruise flight over the Pacific Ocean near the Aleutian Islands. Two passengers ultimately died.

FedEx Flight 14, MD-11 N611FE, crashed during a landing at Newark Liberty International Airport, New Jersey on July 31, 1997. The aircraft flipped onto its back and subsequently burned, following a landing attempt from an unstabilized flare.

Swissair Flight 111, HB-IWF, crashed into the Atlantic Ocean on September 2, 1998 while en route from New York City to Geneva, Switzerland. All 229 people on board perished. The cause of the crash was determined to be a fire caused by improper wiring of Swissair-added passenger entertainment system units. The fire started at the front of the aircraft and quickly grew uncontrollable, attributed partly to the poor flame retardant properties of its metalized mylar insulation.

Korean Air, MD-11 HL7373, crashed shortly after take off April 15, 1999 while operating cargo flight KE6316 from Shanghai Hongqiao International Airport to Seoul. After take off, the first officer contacted Shanghai Departure, which cleared the flight to climb to 1500 meters (4900 ft): "Korean Air six three one six now turn left direct to November Hotel Whiskey climb and maintain one thousand five hundred meters." When the aircraft climbed to 4,500 feet (1,400 m) in the corridor, the captain, after receiving two wrong affirmative answers from the first officer that the required altitude should be 1,500 ft (457 m), thought that the aircraft was 3,000 ft (914 m) too high. The captain then pushed the control column abruptly and roughly forward causing the MD-11 to enter a rapid descent. Both crew members tried to recover from the dive, but were unable.

China Airlines Flight 642, a MD-11, crashed August 22, 1999 while landing at Hong Kong airport during a typhoon (A typhoon? WTF???) that exceeded the plane's crosswind specifications, also flipping onto its back and burning. Three passengers were killed.

FedEx Express Flight 87, MD-11 N581FE, was written off after landing at Subic Bay International Airport, Philippines on October 17, 1999. The aircraft was operating from Shanghai Hongqiao International Airport. Upon landing, the aircraft rolled down the whole length of the runway before plunging into the bay where it was completely submerged except for the cockpit. An excessive approach and landing speed was pointed out as probable cause of the accident.

FedEx Express Flight 80, N526FE, crashed at Narita International Airport, Japan on March 23, 2009 while landing in windy conditions. Airport surveillance video showed the aircraft becoming airborne again after the first touch-down, then impacting nose-first the second time and turning onto its left side, erupting into flames; the impact flipped the aircraft upside down. The aircraft finally came to rest some distance left of the runway. The two flight crew members were killed.

On November 28, 2009, an Avient Aviation MD-11F, registration Z-BAV (c/n 48408), crashed on take-off from Shanghai Pudong International Airport on a flight to Bishkek-Manas International Airport, Kyrgyzstan with the loss of 3 lives.[42] The aircraft was written-off.

On July 27, 2010 a Lufthansa Cargo flight 8460, a MD-11, crash landed in Riyadh, Saudi-Arabia. The two pilots are reported to have survived.

ccr32

1,983 posts

248 months

Tuesday 27th July 2010
quotequote all
Joecooool said:
Stuff from Wikipedia
They do seem to have a nasty habit of flipping and burning though, don't they...

High CofG due to the third engine causing inheriant unstability in sketchy landing conditions maybe?? Does seem like if they bounce, you're fked.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

125,742 posts

295 months

Tuesday 27th July 2010
quotequote all
ccr32 said:
Joecooool said:
Stuff from Wikipedia
They do seem to have a nasty habit of flipping and burning though, don't they...

High CofG due to the third engine causing inheriant unstability in sketchy landing conditions maybe?? Does seem like if they bounce, you're fked.
I agree.

It would be interesting to se if the latest accident is of a similar type.

Joecooool

1,020 posts

258 months

Tuesday 27th July 2010
quotequote all
ccr32 said:
Joecooool said:
Stuff from Wikipedia
They do seem to have a nasty habit of flipping and burning though, don't they...

High CofG due to the third engine causing inheriant unstability in sketchy landing conditions maybe?? Does seem like if they bounce, you're fked.
Well, with hundreds of aircraft making millions of landings, I don't think I'd classify the two incidents on record as a habit. Particularly when one of the incidents happened under high cross winds.

As a pilot and air traffic controller, I'd classify that more to pilot error.