Depreciation Proof Motoring
Depreciation Proof Motoring
Author
Discussion

Mrlol

Original Poster:

216 posts

254 months

Thursday 29th July 2010
quotequote all
For the same price as a New V8 M3, what would you buy that would either not depreciate AT ALL, or preferably gain money ?

Heres my bets for what would either gain money or never loose it.

996 GT3 RS

http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/1861369.htm

RS badge, future classic if every i saw one.

Ferrari 550 Maranello

http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/1819433.htm

Future classic, V12 front engined 2 seat ferrari, for les than 40k what more could you possibly want ?

So then, whats your picks ?

Major T

1,046 posts

225 months

Thursday 29th July 2010
quotequote all
Interested in any picks with low maintenance.

Elises and VX220s appear to have depreciated very very little in the last 5 years.

BUG4LIFE

2,518 posts

248 months

Thursday 29th July 2010
quotequote all
I'd spend less and buy a E46 CSL - they'll go up in value.

My JDM Integra was depreciation proof, as was my MK2 16v Golf GTi - though obviously a bunch less dosh that you're taking about!

Hmm, 993 Turbo?

Luke.

12,009 posts

280 months

Thursday 29th July 2010
quotequote all
2002 Boxster S's without any doubt whatsoever. In fact, they're going up in value almost daily. biggrin

clarkmagpie

3,702 posts

225 months

Thursday 29th July 2010
quotequote all
Griff's are doing well at the moment smile

Huntsman

9,343 posts

280 months

Thursday 29th July 2010
quotequote all
BUG4LIFE said:
Hmm, 993 Turbo?
And 964 turbo, in fact any old 911.

Merc R129 SL, 107 SL for that matter.

Lots of old bangers, trouble is, they dont depreciate, but they do cost more to run, and, when they play up it might take longer to source the parts to get them fixed.

Having said that I only ever run depreciation proof cars.


bikemonster

1,188 posts

271 months

Thursday 29th July 2010
quotequote all
I don’t think that any 996 variant will be depreciation proof, for similar reasons to the way the 964 is not terribly sought after. Absolutely nothing wrong with either, but neither was as well received as the 911’s before or after them. The 996 looks fat and bloaty, quite possibly because of its fried egg headlights. The 993 that preceded it will have the cachet of being the last of the air cooled cars and the 997 that succeeded it has crisper styling.

For real depreciation proof motoring, take a look at a Caterham. R300 – and that’s 300bhp/ton – seems to be regarded as the “sweet spot” with enough power to entertain you and still humble supposedly faster cars, with inexpensive running costs.

Remember also, that cars that were expensive when new tend to be expensive to run, no matter how inexpensive they become to acquire.

Fittster

20,120 posts

243 months

Thursday 29th July 2010
quotequote all
What annual mileage are you going to do?

Mrlol

Original Poster:

216 posts

254 months

Thursday 29th July 2010
quotequote all
Not a serious thread, but if you're going to let it keep / accumulate in value its got to be a garage queen weekend toy hasnt it ?

carmadgaz

3,204 posts

213 months

Thursday 29th July 2010
quotequote all
Landrover. Any Series will hold / gain as long as you keep it maintained.

matc

4,738 posts

237 months

Thursday 29th July 2010
quotequote all
There are a few classic 911's that seem to be going up in value at the moment, but it depends if you want to buy something you can actually use.

Also a few older Ferrari's are at a price that can't get much lower at the moment.

Another car that seem relatively depreciation proof at the moment is the M3 CSL, although I think these are due a huge price re-alignment shortly, I can see them dropping in value as a few hit higher mileages.

Basically if you want something depreciation proof then you are going to have to look at a classic and maybe try and find 'the next in thing!'.

Mrlol

Original Poster:

216 posts

254 months

Thursday 29th July 2010
quotequote all
bikemonster said:
I don’t think that any 996 variant will be depreciation proof, for similar reasons to the way the 964 is not terribly sought after. Absolutely nothing wrong with either, but neither was as well received as the 911’s before or after them. The 996 looks fat and bloaty, quite possibly because of its fried egg headlights. The 993 that preceded it will have the cachet of being the last of the air cooled cars and the 997 that succeeded it has crisper styling.
but a 996 Turbo can be had for low 30s

Surely they cant get any lower than that. A 911 turbo for 20 grand ? dont think it will happen personally.

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

220 months

Thursday 29th July 2010
quotequote all
Luke. said:
2002 Boxster S's without any doubt whatsoever. In fact, they're going up in value almost daily. biggrin
really?

Luke.

12,009 posts

280 months

Thursday 29th July 2010
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
Luke. said:
2002 Boxster S's without any doubt whatsoever. In fact, they're going up in value almost daily. biggrin
really?
Really. They've been so undervalued and are a nicer prospect that a boggo 996. They're also not caught up in the whole 964/993/996 thing. A well specced one is also a rather nice place to be. smile

Mrlol

Original Poster:

216 posts

254 months

Friday 30th July 2010
quotequote all
any other suggestions ? Not sure i'd be wanting a boxster for this money - i'd always be thinking i'd have been better off with a 911.

Negative Creep

26,088 posts

257 months

Friday 30th July 2010
quotequote all
Sierra Cosworth 3 door, E30 M3 or a HF Integrale

iain014

192 posts

204 months

Friday 30th July 2010
quotequote all
z3 Breadvan
Alfa Romeo SZ/RZ, 147GTA
Mk1 Focus RS
Renault Sport Spider
Mk1 Exige
Lotus Europa? Quite like these

Hopefully the guy above is right about the Boxsters seeing as Ive just bought one of the last 986's for £9.5k!