Rolling road day with a difference.
Rolling road day with a difference.
Author
Discussion

Ab Shocks

Original Poster:

1,686 posts

244 months

Monday 2nd August 2010
quotequote all
Rather than all meeting up for a willy waving day, I have asked Atspeed at Rayleigh to orgasise a day to show what can be achieved on std road cars by optomising fueling and timing on a sample car and testing as many others as possible.
They have offered to do this on Sat 4th September and I think it could be an interesting day. I will also drop down to take people out in the Gaz car to show that the hype matches up to reality.

Sign up below if you would be interested in optomising what you have got without FI.

Matt UK

18,081 posts

224 months

Monday 2nd August 2010
quotequote all
I'd be interested in this

MX-5 Lazza

7,954 posts

243 months

Monday 2nd August 2010
quotequote all
Me too smile

Ab Shocks

Original Poster:

1,686 posts

244 months

Monday 2nd August 2010
quotequote all
MX-5 Lazza said:
Me too smile
If you're talking about the Hornet fair enough, if you're talking about your SC jobbie, that counts as willy waving and not what I had in mind but you are always welcome anyway Laz.
BTW, I'm on Nutz as well but if you want to help promote it anywhere else, great!

MX-5 Lazza

7,954 posts

243 months

Monday 2nd August 2010
quotequote all
Yes I am talking about Hornet (though if I can get one of the other guys to take Hornet I'll bring my car anyway smile)

Herman Toothrot

6,702 posts

222 months

Monday 2nd August 2010
quotequote all
How do you propose they adjust fueling on a standard car?

Ab Shocks

Original Poster:

1,686 posts

244 months

Monday 2nd August 2010
quotequote all
Herman Toothrot said:
How do you propose they adjust fueling on a standard car?
Its a copy of the Bosch system with a clock type mechanism where the spring wears and you can move the fueling up and down the range to get an average fueling for power or ecomomy. Quite often the 1.6L is running very lean or very rich and goes down on power to 100bhp, if you add into this the fact that the timing marks are often 4 degrees out, it is possible to move back to the 115bhp that the car was intended to produce by just adjusting average fueling and optomising timing

Edited by Ab Shocks on Monday 2nd August 17:01


Edited by Ab Shocks on Monday 2nd August 17:03

jammiedodger26

634 posts

222 months

Monday 2nd August 2010
quotequote all
I'd be very interested in this!

OilyRagMan

3,848 posts

273 months

Monday 2nd August 2010
quotequote all
Cant do 4th September but i would be interested if another one is organised in the future.

Herman Toothrot

6,702 posts

222 months

Monday 2nd August 2010
quotequote all
Ab Shocks said:
Herman Toothrot said:
How do you propose they adjust fueling on a standard car?
Its a copy of the Bosch system with a clock type mechanism where the spring wears and you can move the fueling up and down the range to get an average fueling for power or ecomomy. Quite often the 1.6L is running very lean or very rich and goes down on power to 100bhp, if you add into this the fact that the timing marks are often 4 degrees out, it is possible to move back to the 115bhp that the car was intended to produce by just adjusting average fueling and optomising timing

Edited by Ab Shocks on Monday 2nd August 17:01


Edited by Ab Shocks on Monday 2nd August 17:03
Ah I see I was thinking of my 1.8 which isn't a flappy type air meter and theres no adjusting fueling on that. Base timing has often been discussed and some claim a move to 12 or even 14 degrees is beneficial in the mid range on 1.6's but again doesn't do anything for the 1.8's.

Ab Shocks

Original Poster:

1,686 posts

244 months

Monday 2nd August 2010
quotequote all
Herman Toothrot said:
Ab Shocks said:
Herman Toothrot said:
How do you propose they adjust fueling on a standard car?
Its a copy of the Bosch system with a clock type mechanism where the spring wears and you can move the fueling up and down the range to get an average fueling for power or ecomomy. Quite often the 1.6L is running very lean or very rich and goes down on power to 100bhp, if you add into this the fact that the timing marks are often 4 degrees out, it is possible to move back to the 115bhp that the car was intended to produce by just adjusting average fueling and optomising timing

Edited by Ab Shocks on Monday 2nd August 17:01


Edited by Ab Shocks on Monday 2nd August 17:03
Ah I see I was thinking of my 1.8 which isn't a flappy type air meter and theres no adjusting fueling on that. Base timing has often been discussed and some claim a move to 12 or even 14 degrees is beneficial in the mid range on 1.6's but again doesn't do anything for the 1.8's.
Watch this space, Piasini have software for the 1.8 and the 2l sport and the 1.8 goes up to 150bhp before improving induction. I'm getting data together for the 2L sport we use in the Mk3 race cars and this will cross over for the 1.8's

Stevesh

87 posts

236 months

Monday 2nd August 2010
quotequote all
Which mk 1.8?

150bhp in a Mk1 would be interesting!

Steve

tuttle

3,427 posts

261 months

Tuesday 3rd August 2010
quotequote all
OilyRagMan said:
Cant do 4th September but i would be interested if another one is organised in the future.
+1 Same here

Herman Toothrot

6,702 posts

222 months

Tuesday 3rd August 2010
quotequote all
Stevesh said:
Which mk 1.8?

150bhp in a Mk1 would be interesting!

Steve
Agreed a quick remap of the oem ecu to 150bhp would be great.

snotrag

15,509 posts

235 months

Tuesday 3rd August 2010
quotequote all
I think there talking about the 1.8 and 2ltr duratec Mazda/ford engine there.


The mk1 ecu is too stupid to be remappable and even if it were it's pretty slow/unpowerful.

Which is why even on an otherwise stock 1.8 you can get 150 quite easily apparently just by losing the maf and running it off megasquirt. Which I am seriously considering.

Afaik above ~4krpm the stock ecu is about as clever as "put loads of fuel in" and that's that. Hence poor economy too.

Where I'd this rolling road?

dylan0451

1,040 posts

215 months

Tuesday 3rd August 2010
quotequote all
this is exactly what i was going to have done/looked at by my local RR chap. will def attend if i can make it. i'd be interested also to see if my apparent 137 horses actually exist from a 1600 of whether the operator added some bullst correction factors

MX-5 Lazza

7,954 posts

243 months

Tuesday 3rd August 2010
quotequote all
137bhp? What's been done to it?

snotrag

15,509 posts

235 months

Wednesday 4th August 2010
quotequote all
MX-5 Lazza said:
What's been done to it?


I thnik he's assuming some of this -

dylan0451 said:
bullst correction factors
!

"Optimistic Jon's Rolling road tuning TM " hehe


Anyway I looked it up - are we talking about rayliegh in Essex? Pity cos thats too far really.

J-Tuner

2,855 posts

267 months

Wednesday 4th August 2010
quotequote all
Registering interest if there is some extra grunt to be gained on my totally standard Mk1 1.8 in the future!! biggrin

BCA

8,651 posts

281 months

Wednesday 4th August 2010
quotequote all
Ab shocks, are you saying there is a potential of 150bhp (up from 130-140bhp) of a mk2 1.8?? Or are you talking about the Duratec in the later mk3 cars?

I hope someone turns up with a standard(or standard-ish) mk2 1.8, I'd love to make an appearance, but my car is hundreds of miles away from the RR and I am in Spain still... smile