BMW GT - yey or ney?
Author
Discussion

Kentish

Original Poster:

15,169 posts

263 months

Tuesday 17th August 2010
quotequote all
I saw one for the first time this morning (that I noticed anyway).

A 5 series with a sloping back by the look of it.

Much like the fugly X6 only lower to the ground.

Why they bother is beyond me; why not just stick with the traditional and usually beautifully executed tourings models.


Kentish

Original Poster:

15,169 posts

263 months

Tuesday 17th August 2010
quotequote all
PS..... it gets worse when viewed from the rear.

kambites

71,474 posts

250 months

Tuesday 17th August 2010
quotequote all
I think it's actually more like the 7-series than the 5-series, except in styling. It's basically a 7-series estate but BMW didn't want to make a 7-series estate so they built something that looks like an ugly 5-series... thing... instead.

beanbag

7,346 posts

270 months

Tuesday 17th August 2010
quotequote all
My old boss had one. Not my cup of tea but I suppose it suits others.

It's actually much bigger than the 5 series or at least it felt that way......

Jem0911

4,415 posts

230 months

Tuesday 17th August 2010
quotequote all
Not for me, Looks all kinda wrong from the rear.

Deerfoot

5,245 posts

213 months

Tuesday 17th August 2010
quotequote all
There are two locally to me. A white one which looks huge and a dark metallic blue one which looks slightly better. I`d have one though.

There`s also a dark brown X1 locally which is just plain ugly.

fatboy b

9,665 posts

245 months

Tuesday 17th August 2010
quotequote all
Saw one last week hurl

Another company trying to jump on the XF-style bandwagon, and fking up immensely.

Edited by fatboy b on Tuesday 17th August 10:22

Gun

13,432 posts

247 months

Tuesday 17th August 2010
quotequote all
They're ghastly.

Tminus2mins

30 posts

194 months

Tuesday 17th August 2010
quotequote all
Perhaps it's their new business strategy?

Making BMW models so ugly they become 'exclusive' and 'rare' again.

Just a thought...

BOR

5,146 posts

284 months

Tuesday 17th August 2010
quotequote all
Badly proportioned in terms of styling. Going on appearances alone, for me, undesirable. Until I saw their used prices. For obvious reasons, depreciation is pretty bad on these, so you have to reconsider them if buying second-hand.

I make a 1400km journey a few times each year, which takes about 14hrs doing it in one day. For this type of journey, the GT makes massive sense, and is probably the best BMW to choose.

I wouldn't buy one new, but as a fully loaded, long distance 7 series hatchback, then definitely worth a second thought if buying used.

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

219 months

Tuesday 17th August 2010
quotequote all
Kentish said:
I saw one for the first time this morning (that I noticed anyway).

A 5 series with a sloping back by the look of it.

Much like the fugly X6 only lower to the ground.

Why they bother is beyond me; why not just stick with the traditional and usually beautifully executed tourings models.

X6 looks good, this just doesn't.

beanbag

7,346 posts

270 months

Tuesday 17th August 2010
quotequote all
The Crack Fox said:
Tminus2mins said:
Perhaps it's their new business strategy?

Making BMW models so ugly they become 'exclusive' and 'rare' again.

Just a thought...
Interestingly, we all said that about Bangle's early BMW stuff, yet many folks (myself included) think his stuff has matured rather nicely despite initial disgust.

Still think the 5GT and X6 etc are hideous though...
Agree completely about the Bangle comments. I never liked the 1 series however after the minor facelift, I think it's a top looking car. Much better than the new Golf, Skodas and boring A3. Of course it's my personal point of view but it's the best of the bunch by miles.

Zod

35,295 posts

287 months

Tuesday 17th August 2010
quotequote all
The 5 Series GT has been done to death here (as has the X6). It's an ugly car - unlike the new 5 Series - but it is very practical and gets good reviews. I just wouldnt' want to look at it every day.

swamp

1,014 posts

218 months

Tuesday 17th August 2010
quotequote all
Kentish said:
Why they bother is beyond me; why not just stick with the traditional and usually beautifully executed tourings models.
Britain is a just small (almost bankrupt) island in the north east Atlantic. BMW sell their cars all round the World, and these days they will be concentrating on the important growth markets like Russia, China, India, Brazil etc. Consumers over there have money, but perhaps less taste (by our standards).

Get over it. BMW don't make cars for us anymore; they make cars for 'them'...!

5potTurbo

13,679 posts

197 months

Tuesday 17th August 2010
quotequote all
When I first saw one I thought "yey", now I think "ney"

CraigW

12,248 posts

311 months

Tuesday 17th August 2010
quotequote all
I saw one on the road and a bit of sick came into my mouth, almost as bad as the X1, but not quite. Simply horrible looking cars.

Kentish

Original Poster:

15,169 posts

263 months

Tuesday 17th August 2010
quotequote all
This is the last nice looking BMW hatch made wink


Zod

35,295 posts

287 months

Tuesday 17th August 2010
quotequote all
The X1 is worse. The front is an abomination. The fronts of the X5, new X3 and even the X6 lok fine, so it is mystifying that the X1 just looks so wrong.

kambites

71,474 posts

250 months

Tuesday 17th August 2010
quotequote all
Kentish said:
This is the last nice looking BMW hatch made wink
hehe

clonmult

10,529 posts

238 months

Tuesday 17th August 2010
quotequote all
CraigW said:
I saw one on the road and a bit of sick came into my mouth, almost as bad as the X1, but not quite. Simply horrible looking cars.
+1

The X6 - fugly. X1 - fugly/pointless. GT - bizarre.

BMW have seriously lost their way of late, 'tis a sad state of affairs.