Cars Bad in Photos - Good in the Flesh
Discussion
It often happens that even the best photos cannot do justice to a car. Recent cases of this IMO have been the Panamera(970); the new Z4; New Ford Taurus; and the XJ. All look far more appealing in person. Some however, such as the XF, are just as boring as they appear on paper. What are some of your recent finds for better or worse?
Edited by Jimbeaux on Sunday 29th August 02:31
Jimbeaux said:
AV12 said:
I'd vote for:
Scag 612:

California:

I think these are both very good looking cars - albeit controversial from some angles. Both of these will age well, I think.
That 612 looks fine in photo form, I would love to see it in person! Scag 612:

California:

I think these are both very good looking cars - albeit controversial from some angles. Both of these will age well, I think.


AV12 said:
Jimbeaux said:
AV12 said:
I'd vote for:
Scag 612:

California:

I think these are both very good looking cars - albeit controversial from some angles. Both of these will age well, I think.
That 612 looks fine in photo form, I would love to see it in person! Scag 612:

California:

I think these are both very good looking cars - albeit controversial from some angles. Both of these will age well, I think.


Edited by Jimbeaux on Sunday 29th August 03:59
AV12 said:
True. This is why I liked the Bangle BMWs, 5 series in particular. It was bold and now look like they will age well. The older XK is a really good looking motor car. The new one seems fussy compared, although I still like it alot.
I am torn between the two. I like most things about the new XK, but the old one won't leave me alone.
My Bangleized Z4 was designed ahead of its time IMO. I think it is more acceptable now than when it was born.Gassing Station | General Gassing [Archive] | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff












