New website photos
Discussion
Hey, I've just added a new batch of photos to my website - please check it out and let me know what you think! www.mpsphotography.co.uk
Mike
Mike
4Lmike said:
miniman said:
Shame no one using an iPad can view it.
yeah its a bugger that iphones/ipads dont support flash. i might have to rethink the whole flash portfolio thingy.I'm not sure who's Enzo it is, it was at the Dunsfold dads day out in May.
Funk said:
4Lmike said:
miniman said:
Shame no one using an iPad can view it.
yeah its a bugger that iphones/ipads dont support flash. i might have to rethink the whole flash portfolio thingy.I'm not sure who's Enzo it is, it was at the Dunsfold dads day out in May.

Just for laughs, perhaps you could explain what Flash adds to the user experience of a photography portfolio?
miniman said:
Funk said:
4Lmike said:
miniman said:
Shame no one using an iPad can view it.
yeah its a bugger that iphones/ipads dont support flash. i might have to rethink the whole flash portfolio thingy.I'm not sure who's Enzo it is, it was at the Dunsfold dads day out in May.

Just for laughs, perhaps you could explain what Flash adds to the user experience of a photography portfolio?
Can you tell me why we shouldn't have Flash just because Jobs got into a pissing contest with Adobe?
Edited by Funk on Monday 30th August 16:28
Flash is very good when used for what it is intended for - interactivity, client-side processing etc. In other words, when it adds something to the experience that can't be done in a different way. In this case, it's not doing that at all - the gallery can be produced without Flash. It's no different to using any proprietary mechanism - Javascript, for instance - one should provide graceful degradation for users who don't have it.
So I haven't at any point said that people shouldn't use Flash; however they should provide degradation for those who don't use it as any standards compliant website would.
Now, back to my question: what has Flash added to the gallery that couldn't be done without it?
So I haven't at any point said that people shouldn't use Flash; however they should provide degradation for those who don't use it as any standards compliant website would.
Now, back to my question: what has Flash added to the gallery that couldn't be done without it?
Gassing Station | Photography & Video | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff




