Why has noone gone mental at the Chinese over this?
Why has noone gone mental at the Chinese over this?
Author
Discussion

Dupont666

Original Poster:

22,925 posts

222 months

Wednesday 1st September 2010
quotequote all
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1307779/Di...

Seems in very bad taste to have adverts of Di in her underwear on anniversary of her death...


Eric Mc

125,742 posts

295 months

Wednesday 1st September 2010
quotequote all
I'd have thought he would have a fairly neutral view on this topic.


obob

4,193 posts

224 months

Wednesday 1st September 2010
quotequote all
Erm its not Diana.......


Rude-boy

22,227 posts

263 months

Wednesday 1st September 2010
quotequote all
Bad taste – Possibly

About to get sued by the DPoW Foundation (or whatever their name is) – unlikely unless the goods are ever sold outside PRC due to their totally nonexistent copyright, etc laws.

Measuring on my give-a-st-ometer? – Nope.

Mr E Driver

8,542 posts

214 months

Wednesday 1st September 2010
quotequote all
It is
No one


The only Noone is a well known singer of Herman's Hermits

Snoggledog

9,265 posts

247 months

Wednesday 1st September 2010
quotequote all
Their website seems to be down which is a pity. Also their web domain address is registered in Glasgow confused

Eric Mc

125,742 posts

295 months

Wednesday 1st September 2010
quotequote all
They should re-release "Diana" by Paul Anka.

Spiritual_Beggar

4,833 posts

224 months

Wednesday 1st September 2010
quotequote all
Dupont666 said:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1307779/Di...

Seems in very bad taste to have adverts of Di in her underwear on anniversary of her death...
Not the worst case scenario.

Imagine the 'poor taste' if they pictured her in her 'Birthday Suit' on the anniversary of her death.

At least these guys drew line hehe

shakotan

10,862 posts

226 months

Wednesday 1st September 2010
quotequote all
Dupont666 said:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1307779/Di...

Seems in very bad taste to have adverts of Di in her underwear on anniversary of her death...
I'm sure anyone who uses an image of Einstein are also carefully to ensure it doesn't clash with the anniversary of his death, save for upsetting any relatives.

At least the images of Einstein are actually him though.

ewenm

28,506 posts

275 months

Wednesday 1st September 2010
quotequote all
shakotan said:
Dupont666 said:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1307779/Di...

Seems in very bad taste to have adverts of Di in her underwear on anniversary of her death...
I'm sure anyone who uses an image of Einstein are also carefully to ensure it doesn't clash with the anniversary of his death, save for upsetting any relatives.

At least the images of Einstein are actually him though.
And Marilyn Monroe...


Seriously though, why would anyone care?

shakotan

10,862 posts

226 months

Wednesday 1st September 2010
quotequote all
ewenm said:
shakotan said:
Dupont666 said:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1307779/Di...

Seems in very bad taste to have adverts of Di in her underwear on anniversary of her death...
I'm sure anyone who uses an image of Einstein are also carefully to ensure it doesn't clash with the anniversary of his death, save for upsetting any relatives.

At least the images of Einstein are actually him though.
And Marilyn Monroe...


Seriously though, why would anyone care?
Only the handwringers who buy Diana souvenir plates from the back of the Sunday rag mags for 3 easy installments of £39.95, eh.

Jasandjules

72,622 posts

259 months

Wednesday 1st September 2010
quotequote all
Why has no-one gone mental? A number of reasons.

B17NNS

18,506 posts

277 months

Wednesday 1st September 2010
quotequote all
Spiritual_Beggar said:
Not the worst case scenario.
No that would be the Diana dildo with packaging that read 'Royally fk yourself with this true latex likeness of Dodi's dong. Available in realistic flesh colour or authentic Obsidian Black'

herewego

8,814 posts

243 months

Wednesday 1st September 2010
quotequote all
Is that august publication suggesting that the picture they've published shouldn't be published?

Engineer1

10,486 posts

239 months

Wednesday 1st September 2010
quotequote all
Because few people give a flying fk outside of the mail, mirror and express.

perdu

4,885 posts

229 months

Wednesday 1st September 2010
quotequote all
herewego said:
Is that august publication suggesting that the picture they've published shouldn't be published?
I cant open the link frown

shouldn't that August publication be a September one now




(saw a picture today of an advert in China for a rather sweet undie set... not fussed or impressed, then again I don't wear rather sweet undies)

The picture I saw was in the Excess

edit for some kind of accuracy frown



Edited by perdu on Wednesday 1st September 22:54

dmqn

3 posts

193 months

Wednesday 1st September 2010
quotequote all
B17NNS said:
Spiritual_Beggar said:
Not the worst case scenario.
No that would be the Diana dildo with packaging that read 'Royally fk yourself with this true latex likeness of Dodi's dong. Available in realistic flesh colour or authentic Obsidian Black'
roflroflrofl

DangerousMike

11,327 posts

222 months

Wednesday 1st September 2010
quotequote all
i suspect it's because nobody cares

dudleybloke

20,553 posts

216 months

Thursday 2nd September 2010
quotequote all
what about poor henri, the pissed up driver of hearts.....

will they get a fat frenchman to advertise y-fronts?

if not its sexist!
smile

HOGEPH

5,249 posts

216 months

Thursday 2nd September 2010
quotequote all
"The apparent attempt to exploit the princess's image is the latest example of how firms around the world have sought to capitalise on her popularity and glamour."

Would that include the Daily Mail?