Daily f***ing Mail
Discussion
Is there a reason they get everything wrong?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1308287/Fe...
The headline:
/RANT.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1308287/Fe...
The headline:
DailyMail said:
From prancing horse to pranged write-off: Driver smashes into delivery van in his £140,000 Ferrari
Then the 3rd paragraph..DailyMail said:
Towards the end of yesterday's morning rush hour the £120,000 supercar
Is it just me or do they get something like this wrong everytime on supercar related stories? It always seems to be the pricing of the item?/RANT.
Edited by Danny S on Thursday 2nd September 15:18
Liokault said:
Isn’t it standard Ferrari depreciation? £20k is 40 seconds sounds about right.
If he put his typewrite away mid story, read a bit about Ferrari fires, his next valuation would be £100,000 super car
Nice point If he put his typewrite away mid story, read a bit about Ferrari fires, his next valuation would be £100,000 super car


The best bit is that neither price is right, the Spyder lists at £147k, so surely you should round it to £150k?
minky monkey said:
This job was posted up on another forum I visit.

There is quite some distance in a straight line between the corner and the point of impact. I'm not sure how the driver missed the fact that there was a massive great big white van blocking the road infront of him.
Not to mention the van is parked on double yellows

Gassing Station | General Gassing [Archive] | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff







k up from the Wail then 
