impossible to go cheaper for less
impossible to go cheaper for less
Author
Discussion

homerjay

Original Poster:

1,249 posts

254 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
ive just watched top gear with the clio 182 (im sat at home on paternity)

i used to have the said car, which i picked up for 11k, rather than the rrp of £14,700. albeit with a few hundred miles on.

jezza stated "impossible to go cheaper for less"

what NEW car could currently hold that mantle?

baring in you can get coniderable discounts on uk cars online.

and you can pick pre-reg or ex demo with minimal mileage.

im thinking new skoda fabia vrs

1.4 TSI vRS 5dr DSG
180bhp
0-60 7.0
140mph
£15700
pick one up for £14100 online at http://www.uk-car-discount.co.uk/review.php?ref=48...

added bonus of 45mpg (apparently) and cheap road tax


steeveeboy

663 posts

202 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
Depends whether its new or not really,
An impreza import(L reg) can be had from around £1500 these are quite quick,
Also E39 M5's are quite quick and can be grabbed for about £8,000 upwards.
If new then i expect the Renault Twingo 133 is a contender!
Steve

TheEnd

15,370 posts

217 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
Impossible to go cheaper for less.

I'm struggling with the sentence and what it means...

V88Dicky

7,367 posts

212 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
I catergorically can tell you that you can go cheaper for less than that.





I have seen cars advertised for less than £100 for example.

Republik

4,525 posts

219 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
Impossible to go faster for less would make more sense.

CrisW

522 posts

222 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
Assuming that you're talking abput new cars then surely the newest Veyron also falls in this bracket?

homerjay

Original Poster:

1,249 posts

254 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
oh fk it

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

219 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
TheEnd said:
Impossible to go cheaper for less.

I'm struggling with the sentence and what it means...
+1

I assume the OP is meaning speed, as in bang per buck type of thing. But that isn't what that statement says.

homerjay

Original Poster:

1,249 posts

254 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
TheEnd said:
Impossible to go cheaper for less.

I'm struggling with the sentence and what it means...
+1

I assume the OP is meaning speed, as in bang per buck type of thing. But that isn't what that statement says.
obviously, i meant faster for less.

but im tired, with new baby on my rm and try to pass time without watched the ste that is daytime telly.

i am talking NEW cars only.

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

219 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
homerjay said:
300bhp/ton said:
TheEnd said:
Impossible to go cheaper for less.

I'm struggling with the sentence and what it means...
+1

I assume the OP is meaning speed, as in bang per buck type of thing. But that isn't what that statement says.
obviously, i meant faster for less.

but im tired, with new baby on my rm and try to pass time without watched the ste that is daytime telly.

i am talking NEW cars only.
Guess it depends how big a bang and how many bucks.

I mean a 300hp Impreza STI is quite a bit more powerful and faster than a Clio 200. And is still good money, but which is the best bang per buck is probably up for debate.

Are there any Bathurst 500 VXR8's still for sale new? In HP terms they must be hard to beat I'd think.

Nissan 370z probably a fairly good contender too considering it's plus 300HP rating.

Jeffmaniac

533 posts

228 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
I remember that episode and the point was that a 182 would go around the track faster than anything else for the price brand new. Today would be the clio 200 or possibly vauxhall corsa vxr at around about £16k each. Dont think a fiat 500 essesse would keep up.

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

219 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
Jeffmaniac said:
I remember that episode and the point was that a 182 would go around the track faster than anything else for the price brand new. Today would be the clio 200 or possibly vauxhall corsa vxr at around about £16k each. Dont think a fiat 500 essesse would keep up.
Or a kit car.... wink

homerjay

Original Poster:

1,249 posts

254 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
Jeffmaniac said:
I remember that episode and the point was that a 182 would go around the track faster than anything else for the price brand new. Today would be the clio 200 or possibly vauxhall corsa vxr at around about £16k each. Dont think a fiat 500 essesse would keep up.
Or a kit car.... wink
kit car is a valid argument i guess.

whats the cost/spec of a kit car that could be used daily (ie have a roof)

but aside from a kit car, is it possible to get to sixty under 7 secs for less than 14k (fabia vrs)?

im reckon no.


300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

219 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
homerjay said:
300bhp/ton said:
Jeffmaniac said:
I remember that episode and the point was that a 182 would go around the track faster than anything else for the price brand new. Today would be the clio 200 or possibly vauxhall corsa vxr at around about £16k each. Dont think a fiat 500 essesse would keep up.
Or a kit car.... wink
kit car is a valid argument i guess.

whats the cost/spec of a kit car that could be used daily (ie have a roof)

but aside from a kit car, is it possible to get to sixty under 7 secs for less than 14k (fabia vrs)?

im reckon no.
I guess it all depends. Some people use Caterhams daily and there are hundreds of varying kits out there. Also if track speed is your priority does practicality, let alone a new stock car really have any relevance?? I know what you mean, but I can't see the point, unless money is no object. But then if it wasn't, you hardly be looking at the cheapest.

RX8's are good value I think.

dwilkie

2,222 posts

215 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
homerjay said:
kit car is a valid argument i guess.

whats the cost/spec of a kit car that could be used daily (ie have a roof)

but aside from a kit car, is it possible to get to sixty under 7 secs for less than 14k (fabia vrs)?

im reckon no.
Were we or were we not including ex-demo cars for that? Since the whole system falls apart if you aren't going on list price, surely it makes sense to stick to list? In which case Fabia VRS iirc is £15,700 and therefore the answer is yes - Renault Clio Cup?

TheEnd

15,370 posts

217 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
He's right, the statements are trying to contradict each other.
If you want something fast, you could get something for 14k that will give your mum a heart attack.

You can go fast, or new, but together, you're going to have to bring down expectations on one criteria by a huge amount.

homerjay

Original Poster:

1,249 posts

254 months

Monday 6th September 2010
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
i dont disagree, the fabia does nothing for me in terms of style.

but some people like the idea of trouble free motoring from a new car, rather than gambling on a older car which is more likely to break.

some people also like new cars to be economical and cheap to run. and dont argue that if you wanna go fast, you should want economy because that bks.