E92 M3 Tyres
E92 M3 Tyres
Author
Discussion

NIIKME

Original Poster:

562 posts

245 months

Tuesday 7th September 2010
quotequote all
So Im now on the wear blocks of my Cups. I need to ditch them for something a bit more "all weather" although I have to say they have been brilliant over the summer!

Stealer is quoting 1250 for PS2s or 1100 for Continentals. I've not yet started the ring around. Can I just ask how many miles I should expect on each because from experience whilst the Michelins cost a bit more they tend to last a lot longer.

I get the impression no-one goes for Contis although I am told that its BMWs factory choice for the M3 now? Every other model gets Bridgestone but they don't make them for the M is that right?

thanks in advance

and PS. the search facility is down!!!!!!!!!!

Great Pretender

26,140 posts

238 months

Tuesday 7th September 2010
quotequote all
£1200 for PSII's (which are now out of date) is beyond a joke - although I suspect you realise this.

The Michelin Pilot Sport III is a very good tyre (as its predecessor was) and will set you back about £800 for a set from a decent tyre outfit.

Bumble SV

248 posts

230 months

Tuesday 7th September 2010
quotequote all
Great Pretender said:
£1200 for PSII's (which are now out of date) is beyond a joke - although I suspect you realise this.

The Michelin Pilot Sport III is a very good tyre (as its predecessor was) and will set you back about £800 for a set from a decent tyre outfit.
From what I understand from Michelin, PS3s do not replace PS2s, with the PS2 still being the tyre for the "highest performance cars". See http://www.michelin.co.uk/connected/tyres/michelin... and http://www.michelin.co.uk/connected/tyres/michelin...

A bizarre naming system though.

pjv997

667 posts

206 months

Tuesday 7th September 2010
quotequote all
I got 16,000 miles out of the rears on my PSII's and could still have run them a bit longer. Fronts look absolutely fine at the moment and look like they will last well beyond 20,000.

Replaced the rear tyres about six weeks ago - I got about four quotes from tyre suppliers generally recommended by other PHers and they all came out between £300 and £320 each fitted for the rears (for 19's)


phatgixer

4,988 posts

273 months

Wednesday 8th September 2010
quotequote all
Do not, under any circumstances fit the crapulent Contis. Will spoil the car.

PS2s are the right tyre. £1100 from Abingdon tyres.

rassi

2,513 posts

275 months

Wednesday 8th September 2010
quotequote all
I am on PS2s right now (E39 M5) and they last extremely well and are happy with them. However, based on the Evo tyre test, I might be tempted to try the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric next time - don't know how it is rated for the E92, though.

Great Pretender

26,140 posts

238 months

Wednesday 8th September 2010
quotequote all
Bumble SV said:
Great Pretender said:
£1200 for PSII's (which are now out of date) is beyond a joke - although I suspect you realise this.

The Michelin Pilot Sport III is a very good tyre (as its predecessor was) and will set you back about £800 for a set from a decent tyre outfit.
From what I understand from Michelin, PS3s do not replace PS2s, with the PS2 still being the tyre for the "highest performance cars". See http://www.michelin.co.uk/connected/tyres/michelin... and http://www.michelin.co.uk/connected/tyres/michelin...

A bizarre naming system though.
Note to self: never trust the words of a tyre monkey again.

mmm-five

12,128 posts

308 months

Wednesday 8th September 2010
quotequote all
And if you believe the words of AutoBild magazine, the new Conti SportContact 5P, Bridgestone RE050 and Hankook Ventus Evo S1 all beat the PS2 in dry & wet performance.

Great Pretender

26,140 posts

238 months

Wednesday 8th September 2010
quotequote all
mmm-five said:
And if you believe the words of AutoBild magazine, the new Conti SportContact 5P, Bridgestone RE050 and Hankook Ventus Evo S1 all beat the PS2 in dry & wet performance.
scratchchin

Having said that, I have a set of Hankook Ventus' on the front of the TT and they are rather good indeed.

mmm-five

12,128 posts

308 months

Wednesday 8th September 2010
quotequote all
Great Pretender said:
mmm-five said:
And if you believe the words of AutoBild magazine, the new Conti SportContact 5P, Bridgestone RE050 and Hankook Ventus Evo S1 all beat the PS2 in dry & wet performance.
scratchchin

Having said that, I have a set of Hankook Ventus' on the front of the TT and they are rather good indeed.
For the price they were earlier in the year (about £110 front & £140 rear IIRC) I would have been tempted to try them on the MC. But when I went to actually buy them, the price had gone up 30%.

rash_decision

1,412 posts

201 months

Wednesday 8th September 2010
quotequote all
I've just seen a rear set of Conti SC3's off in 5000 miles!!! Might be my driving style??? driving

NIIKME

Original Poster:

562 posts

245 months

Wednesday 8th September 2010
quotequote all
rash_decision said:
I've just seen a rear set of Conti SC3's off in 5000 miles!!! Might be my driving style??? driving
burnouts in maccy d's more like

phatgixer

4,988 posts

273 months

Wednesday 8th September 2010
quotequote all
mmm-five said:
And if you believe the words of AutoBild magazine, the new Conti SportContact 5P, Bridgestone RE050 and Hankook Ventus Evo S1 all beat the PS2 in dry & wet performance.
Test undertaken at Conti's test facility, no doubt?

Those damned tests are more advertising features.

The reality is this...

Fit the nasty contis and the tc light flashes continuously. Fit PS2s and the light stays off and alacrity is increased. Also, I had 3, yes THREE!!!!! blowout in 5,000 miles on my Mercedes SL55 and no explanation from Conti. So they can shove it up their 'aris.

On my E92 I get average 15K miles from all 4 tyres. The cup+s were OK but no real step up in dry grip, but poorer in the wet. They wore out agfter 12k miles.

PS2 all the way. They are still current. As I understand it, the PS3 is not a replacement.

NIIKME

Original Poster:

562 posts

245 months

Wednesday 8th September 2010
quotequote all
Thanks for replies so far. PS2s come in at 1079 at micheldever tyres. Still have a few calls to make!

ETA: i have been told more than once the ps3 are not an intended replacement for ps2 (if you believe the greasey's)

Edited by NIIKME on Wednesday 8th September 13:34

mmm-five

12,128 posts

308 months

Wednesday 8th September 2010
quotequote all
phatgixer said:
Test undertaken at Conti's test facility, no doubt?
No, and the Conti 5P didn't take the overall honours anyway, it was just better than the PS2.

phatgixer said:
The reality is this...Fit the nasty contis and the tc light flashes continuously. Fit PS2s and the light stays off and alacrity is increased. Also, I had 3, yes THREE!!!!! blowout in 5,000 miles on my Mercedes SL55 and no explanation from Conti. So they can shove it up their 'aris.
3 blowouts in 5,000 miles on the BRAND NEW Conti SportContact 5P - you must have had the first set off the production line.

phatgixer

4,988 posts

273 months

Wednesday 8th September 2010
quotequote all
mmm-five said:
phatgixer said:
Test undertaken at Conti's test facility, no doubt?
No, and the Conti 5P didn't take the overall honours anyway, it was just better than the PS2.

phatgixer said:
The reality is this...Fit the nasty contis and the tc light flashes continuously. Fit PS2s and the light stays off and alacrity is increased. Also, I had 3, yes THREE!!!!! blowout in 5,000 miles on my Mercedes SL55 and no explanation from Conti. So they can shove it up their 'aris.
3 blowouts in 5,000 miles on the BRAND NEW Conti SportContact 5P - you must have had the first set off the production line.
Nope. Were Sportcontact 2s. Was about 6 years ago now.

Just because they are German does not make them good...


I have followed the threads about conti sport attack motorcycle rubber on S1000RR BMW bikes. Mine (thankfully) came with nice Metzelers but some unfortunates had the contis fitted. In the early days they were all crowing about how good the piles of poo were, but now are yelling about the things giving up grip at any opportunity.

Do not be conned. Same banal marketing drivel that Audi do all the time forcing unnecessary 4wd on the world and spoiling driving pleasure, all hidden by a veil of Germanic knowhow. Complete bollix....

Edited by phatgixer on Wednesday 8th September 13:42

phatgixer

4,988 posts

273 months

Wednesday 8th September 2010
quotequote all
NIIKME said:
Thanks for replies so far. PS2s come in at 1079 at micheldever tyres. Still have a few calls to make!

ETA: i have been told more than once the ps3 are not an intended replacement for ps2 (if you believe the greasey's)

Edited by NIIKME on Wednesday 8th September 13:34
Is that price fitted?

Just checked my last invoice. Was £1,082 fitted from Abingdon tyres (who buy from Micheldever, I think).

NIIKME

Original Poster:

562 posts

245 months

Wednesday 8th September 2010
quotequote all
phatgixer said:
NIIKME said:
Thanks for replies so far. PS2s come in at 1079 at micheldever tyres. Still have a few calls to make!

ETA: i have been told more than once the ps3 are not an intended replacement for ps2 (if you believe the greasey's)

Edited by NIIKME on Wednesday 8th September 13:34
Is that price fitted?

Just checked my last invoice. Was £1,082 fitted from Abingdon tyres (who buy from Micheldever, I think).
Correct, all in. I am quite suprised since they were rubbish when I called them a couple of years back.

waremark

3,296 posts

237 months

Wednesday 8th September 2010
quotequote all
I have stuck with PS2's on my M3. Rears have done 10k per set (now on 4th set) and fronts did 18k. I am on 18's. My last rears were £515 inc VAT etc for the pair from etyres, fitted at home. That price was slightly higher than my local independent dealer, lower than Micheldever.

A very recent Autocar tyre test put the Conti SC3 top.

A previous Autocar test put Eagle F1's top; as a result I bought a set for my wife's SLK, and they had a disastrously short life. I went back to Conti's!

NIIKME

Original Poster:

562 posts

245 months

Tuesday 28th September 2010
quotequote all
Update.

Erm........ so dare I say I called Kwik Fit to satisfy my curiousity? The best offer was 25% off Eagle F1s which puts them at £804 fitted. Unfortunately having gone around the loop with them they can't get the rear tyres for some weeks. Gutted.... temporarily.... until they offered PS2s fitted for £950!!!!! I am over the moon! They must be monthly driven since they must be fitted tomorrow.

Cheers for all advice otherwise!