Where will registration numbers go....
Where will registration numbers go....
Author
Discussion

Legend83

Original Poster:

10,573 posts

251 months

Monday 13th September 2010
quotequote all
Trying to crack what numbers will be used for future number plates:

08
58
09
59
60
?
?
?
?

Any clues?

TonyHetherington

32,091 posts

279 months

Monday 13th September 2010
quotequote all
11
61
12
62

MrCippo

604 posts

224 months

Monday 13th September 2010
quotequote all
11 should give us some pretty good number plates...

Cost Captain

3,920 posts

209 months

Monday 13th September 2010
quotequote all
errr... its pretty logical.

08
58
09
59
10
60
11
61
12
62

all you do is take the last 2 numbers of the year for march registrations and add 5 to the first number for september registrations.... pretty sorted now until 2050

TheDutch

95 posts

245 months

Monday 13th September 2010
quotequote all
Legend83 said:
Any clues?
I don't want to give it away, but can you count higher than 10 or 60?

Legend83

Original Poster:

10,573 posts

251 months

Monday 13th September 2010
quotequote all
I am no accountant....

Oh wait, I am.

smile

cmackay81

9,251 posts

195 months

Monday 13th September 2010
quotequote all
Legend83 said:
Trying to crack what numbers will be used for future number plates:

08
58
09
59
60
?
?
?
?

Any clues?
To be honest, it is unbelievably shortsighted by the DVLA or whoever comes up with this.

For many people out there trying to work out what year a 73 plate car is would totally throw them, surely they should have just made the plate slightly longer and put the full year in.
Better yet, why the hell bother with 2 changes a year, just get back to one. I don't think there can be that many people that are sad enough to want the latest plate any more which I thought was the reason they did it.

The Black Flash

13,735 posts

227 months

Monday 13th September 2010
quotequote all
cmackay81 said:
Legend83 said:
Trying to crack what numbers will be used for future number plates:

08
58
09
59
60
?
?
?
?

Any clues?
To be honest, it is unbelievably shortsighted by the DVLA or whoever comes up with this.

For many people out there trying to work out what year a 73 plate car is would totally throw them, surely they should have just made the plate slightly longer and put the full year in.
Better yet, why the hell bother with 2 changes a year, just get back to one. I don't think there can be that many people that are sad enough to want the latest plate any more which I thought was the reason they did it.
yes

Quite why they felt the need to replace years AD with with some new numbering system which works differently to everything else is beyond me. Keeps someone in a job, I suppose.

DrTre

12,957 posts

261 months

Monday 13th September 2010
quotequote all
cmackay81 said:
Better yet, why the hell bother with 2 changes a year, just get back to one. I don't think there can be that many people that are sad enough to want the latest plate any more which I thought was the reason they did it.
Wrong way round, they got rid of the single change to two in order to spread car sales more evenly throughout the year. Fleet and private buyers would cane the market in Aug/Sept and leave it the rest of the year.

A car with a Y plate might only be a month newer than one with X plate but will command more on the second hand market...that's where the benefit lay, and it adds up if you're a fleet buyer.

RobM77

35,349 posts

263 months

Monday 13th September 2010
quotequote all
The Black Flash said:
cmackay81 said:
Legend83 said:
Trying to crack what numbers will be used for future number plates:

08
58
09
59
60
?
?
?
?

Any clues?
To be honest, it is unbelievably shortsighted by the DVLA or whoever comes up with this.

For many people out there trying to work out what year a 73 plate car is would totally throw them, surely they should have just made the plate slightly longer and put the full year in.
Better yet, why the hell bother with 2 changes a year, just get back to one. I don't think there can be that many people that are sad enough to want the latest plate any more which I thought was the reason they did it.
yes

Quite why they felt the need to replace years AD with with some new numbering system which works differently to everything else is beyond me. Keeps someone in a job, I suppose.
yes Given the current system's numerically limited shelflife, it'd surely be far better to just use the last two digits of the year: 09, 10, 11. We'd be ok for another 90 years then. If they want two registrations per year, just suffix it with an A or a B.

davepen

1,483 posts

299 months

Monday 13th September 2010
quotequote all
RobM77 said:
yes Given the current system's numerically limited shelflife, ... We'd be ok for another 90 years then.
Actually the system could last for another 90 years, they will just reverse the current system from AAYYXXX to XXXYYAA where AA is the area, YY the year code and XXX the "random" letters.
They did this when they went from AAnnnn and XAAnnn to nnnnAA and nnnXAA, and XAAnnnY to YnnnXAA. The major change this time was the Area codes changed and instead of a year letter we got two numbers. The advantage of all these schemes is that they don't "collide" with the previous issuing schemes

RobM77

35,349 posts

263 months

Monday 13th September 2010
quotequote all
davepen said:
RobM77 said:
yes Given the current system's numerically limited shelflife, ... We'd be ok for another 90 years then.
Actually the system could last for another 90 years, they will just reverse the current system from AAYYXXX to XXXYYAA where AA is the area, YY the year code and XXX the "random" letters.
They did this when they went from AAnnnn and XAAnnn to nnnnAA and nnnXAA, and XAAnnnY to YnnnXAA. The major change this time was the Area codes changed and instead of a year letter we got two numbers. The advantage of all these schemes is that they don't "collide" with the previous issuing schemes
Good point yes. However, it doesn't stop the current system being 2 digits for a cryptic code (06, 56 etc), whereas three digits could explain everything simply (06A, 06B etc). I'd go for the simpler version everytime if it just increases the total digit count from 7 to 8.

Gluteus Maximus

345 posts

228 months

Monday 13th September 2010
quotequote all
I'd hazard a guess that within the next 90 years. Number plates will all but be replaced by some form of electronic tracking chipping, constantly being monitored in some way.

Haven't a clue what or how, but I'm sure the current archaic method will definitely be phased out, or at least massively evolve within this century.

Edited by Gluteus Maximus on Monday 13th September 16:48

_rubinho_

1,237 posts

212 months

Monday 13th September 2010
quotequote all
cmackay81 said:
Better yet, why the hell bother with 2 changes a year, just get back to one. I don't think there can be that many people that are sad enough to want the latest plate any more which I thought was the reason they did it.
Why bother with dated registrations at all? Plenty of other countries live without. The VIN is enough to identify the car so its year of first registration is easily tracked. They moved from one date change to two to prevent a rush of new car sales in September. Goes without saying that without dated registrations at all, car sales would be averaged out smoothly throughout all 12 months of the year. The two number year makes select registrations even more pointless than they were under the prefix system.

The new system is silly and the plates are ugly. Come to mention it the area coding makes no sense to man nor beast either.

As an aside, the French have just ruined their plates by going back to white back and front (from yellow rear and white front) and putting the department number separately in a subscript box rather than making it part of the main number. I think that's why all the unions are striking over there!

Balmoral Green

42,561 posts

277 months

Monday 13th September 2010
quotequote all
TheDutch said:
Legend83 said:
Any clues?
I don't want to give it away, but can you count higher than 10 or 60?
Indeed. Why don't people get this? confused

It's just counting. Pick a number, any number, what comes next? Er, the next number does!

Petrolhead_Rich

4,659 posts

221 months

Monday 13th September 2010
quotequote all
does have to be said that this system would be easier:

AAYYY XXX

AA = area
YYY = year
XXX = random

That would last 1000 years, which would outlast any car and therefore easily recycled.....

hornetrider

63,161 posts

234 months

Monday 13th September 2010
quotequote all
Irish system is the best.

92 D 14673 - 14673rd car registered in the County of Dublin in 1992.
02 WW 548 - 548th car registered in the County of Wicklow in 2002.

It's not fking rocket science is it?

lescombes

968 posts

239 months

Monday 13th September 2010
quotequote all
who cares...... we should have a plate issued to the driver and their vehicles.........which transfers from car to car....No Tw*t plates....just fixed style and type like Belgium

The Black Flash

13,735 posts

227 months

Monday 13th September 2010
quotequote all
hornetrider said:
Irish system is the best.

92 D 14673 - 14673rd car registered in the County of Dublin in 1992.
02 WW 548 - 548th car registered in the County of Wicklow in 2002.

It's not fking rocket science is it?
Simple and elegant. Why make it harder?

Crazy Torque

2,632 posts

234 months

Monday 13th September 2010
quotequote all
MrCippo said:
11 should give us some pretty good number plates...
BU11 SHT