Military Aircraft causing vehicle immobilisers to fail?
Military Aircraft causing vehicle immobilisers to fail?
Author
Discussion

TypeR

Original Poster:

1,190 posts

262 months

Wednesday 15th September 2010
quotequote all
I was in France this May with my mate riding to Italy on our M/bikes.
We were filling up at a service station on the motorway when a large transport plane (a C130 possibly?) flew over and landed on the other side of the motorway.

Once the plane had passed over, the majority of cars & my mate's bike at the petrol station refused to start.

The lady at the cash desk said that every time a plane landed it caused havoc with peoples cars.

We managed to get matey's bike started after an hour's faffing, but we left a few other stranded motorists waiting for the breakdown truck!!

Would the plane be putting out jamming signals on it's aproach to the airfield, or was it a massive coincidence that all the cars "died" at the same time?

perdu

4,885 posts

222 months

Wednesday 15th September 2010
quotequote all
TypeR said:
I was in France this May with my mate riding to Italy on our M/bikes.
We were filling up at a service station on the motorway when a large transport plane (a C130 possibly?) flew over and landed on the other side of the motorway.

Once the plane had passed over, the majority of cars & my mate's bike at the petrol station refused to start.

The lady at the cash desk said that every time a plane landed it caused havoc with peoples cars.

We managed to get matey's bike started after an hour's faffing, but we left a few other stranded motorists waiting for the breakdown truck!!

Would the plane be putting out jamming signals on it's aproach to the airfield, or was it a massive coincidence that all the cars "died" at the same time?
When I was a AAMan it was quite normal to attend BHX to attempt to start modern cars (post early nineties models) that had immobiliser failures and associated flat batteries due to constant "alarm sounding-alarm off-alarm sounding" sessions that only stopped when the battery was flat

Many cases of having to try to overcome immobiliser set cars too!

Not caused especially by Military aircraft but mainly by circuits being zapped by constant high energy airfield emissions. I imagine the Herculeses would use a few high energy radar systems on approach too

(We used to cure many of those "immo" problems by towing them a few hundred yards from the airport buildings)

Key to "go"

Hi Uncle Bob thumbup

Brrrmmmm


anonymous-user

77 months

Thursday 16th September 2010
quotequote all
Unlikely that, in a benign peacetime environment, a military aircraft would be emitting anything more or less than their civvy counterparts. Could be aviation related but not specifically military. If you were in Kielder Forest it might be different.

Eric Mc

124,797 posts

288 months

Thursday 16th September 2010
quotequote all
Transport aircraft and airliners don't tend to use radar as a navigation aid. However, a military Hercules might be fitted with active ECM jammers etc which could cause problems I suppose.

Tango13

9,853 posts

199 months

Thursday 16th September 2010
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Transport aircraft and airliners don't tend to use radar as a navigation aid. However, a military Hercules might be fitted with active ECM jammers etc which could cause problems I suppose.
Many years ago I was reading a bike magazine where the journalists recounted an interesting storey.

They were speed testing a bike with a hand held radar at Bruntingthorpe when a pair of A10s made a couple of low passes down the runway. The journalists were curious as to how fast the A10s were traveling so tried to get a reading, the hand held radar stopped working with an error code and wouldn't play ball for several minutes despite being turned off/on repeatedly.

anonymous-user

77 months

Thursday 16th September 2010
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Transport aircraft and airliners don't tend to use radar as a navigation aid. However, a military Hercules might be fitted with active ECM jammers etc which could cause problems I suppose.
Unlikely to be emitting in a peacetime scenario, and even then not on finals.

Tsippy

15,078 posts

192 months

Thursday 16th September 2010
quotequote all
I remember when driving my van in Hereford that I used to have a lot of radio interference about 10 seconds before a fast jet flew right over me...... I think they were using me for target practice? laugh

Happened several times!

perdu

4,885 posts

222 months

Thursday 16th September 2010
quotequote all
I still feel that airfield emmissions are more likly to have caused this

I too doubt if the C130 was emmitting on landing in a peacetime civil airfield scenario

Doesn't even have to be an airfield emissions problem

Next door to Machine Mart in Great Barr, Brummagem there's a Telecoms type building (bristling withh antenna arrays) and I often had to attend immobiliser faults on cars parked nearby

A tow three hundred yards up the A34 to the parking area past the church cured every single one of them, even when the owners had called the manufacturers for help which failed to "help"

Strong signal emissions from a building did cause such symptoms.

Have'nt permitted emissions frequencies been modified and radio frequencies useage changed over the last few years, could this be why?

rhinochopig

17,932 posts

221 months

Thursday 16th September 2010
quotequote all
VHF - if I parked my old scooby near a police station the immobilser would not reset. Happened twice so I threw the standard scooby kit away and fitted another alarm system. Never happened again, but was very very common on that model according to the aa chap.

db

724 posts

192 months

Saturday 23rd October 2010
quotequote all
Crossflow Kid said:
Eric Mc said:
Transport aircraft and airliners don't tend to use radar as a navigation aid. However, a military Hercules might be fitted with active ECM jammers etc which could cause problems I suppose.
Unlikely to be emitting in a peacetime scenario, and even then not on finals.
finals is the most likely time to be hit with hand-held missile. they're low and slow.
ecm is standard procedure for landing

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

285 months

Saturday 23rd October 2010
quotequote all
Approach aids.

eharding

14,648 posts

307 months

Saturday 23rd October 2010
quotequote all
Mojocvh said:
Approach aids.
Vanishingly unlikely, unless this place was using MLS, which is also highly unlikely.

ILS installations are far more at risk of having the localiser and glideslope signals being compromised by external factors than they are of affecting any other systems.

More likely a dodgy mobile phone cell station (possibly in the petrol forecourt sign) and a bit of paranoia.

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

285 months

Saturday 23rd October 2010
quotequote all
eharding said:
Mojocvh said:
Approach aids.
Vanishingly unlikely, unless this place was using MLS, which is also highly unlikely.

ILS installations are far more at risk of having the localiser and glideslope signals being compromised by external factors than they are of affecting any other systems.

More likely a dodgy mobile phone cell station (possibly in the petrol forecourt sign) and a bit of paranoia.
LOL nice way of putting it, how about rad alts?

dudleybloke

20,553 posts

209 months

Saturday 23rd October 2010
quotequote all
Mojocvh said:
Approach aids.
not without a condom though!

anonymous-user

77 months

Saturday 23rd October 2010
quotequote all
db said:
Crossflow Kid said:
Eric Mc said:
Transport aircraft and airliners don't tend to use radar as a navigation aid. However, a military Hercules might be fitted with active ECM jammers etc which could cause problems I suppose.
Unlikely to be emitting in a peacetime scenario, and even then not on finals.
finals is the most likely time to be hit with hand-held missile. they're low and slow.
ecm is standard procedure for landing
Agreed, I meant in peacetime, if an aircraft were emitting for some reason, say a trip to Kielder, that'd all be binned long before going home usually.