fuel saving by drafting, can it be done?
fuel saving by drafting, can it be done?
Author
Discussion

spudgun GB

Original Poster:

461 posts

197 months

Sunday 19th September 2010
quotequote all
I was coming back from the midlands today in the other halfs convertable. Plodding on at 75ish I pulled out of the inside lane and into the wake of a large van in front. The drafting effect was prounced to say the least. I was backing off and still going faster.

And so the game began. There was no way he was shaking me off from then on.
When I lost his tow for a few seconds, I didn't half notice it.
Eventually, he turned off so had to wait for the next prey to come along and do the hard aero work for me.

I'm not sure if we saved much fuel, but it was a bit of a legal entertainment to keep the boredom at bay.

Fatman2

1,464 posts

198 months

Sunday 19th September 2010
quotequote all
I'm not sure if any scientific tests have been done but it should reduce fuel consumption if you sit behind a HGV.

It's not something I've ever tried as you'd have to be pretty close and I don't like being stuck behind HGV's at all due to reduced visibility.

chopper602

2,333 posts

252 months

Sunday 19th September 2010
quotequote all
I used to do that through Europe in my 2CV, stick behind a tall van or truck (Sprinters were good), and then could back off to about half throttle. Worked very well for me!

Once followed a lorry at about 65 for over 100 miles, he knew I was there and would indicate nice and early before any lane changes. When he eventually left the autobahn, he waved and gave me a thumb

pilchardthecat

7,483 posts

208 months

Sunday 19th September 2010
quotequote all
You need to be very close - inside the low pressure space immediately behind the vehicle, but in front of the turbulence caused by the air coming back in (which will hinder your porgress if anything).

You need to be tailgating really, which is bad

TheStoat

1,498 posts

250 months

Sunday 19th September 2010
quotequote all
Try looking for the Mythbusters episode. The results weren't encouraging frown

TonyRPH

13,538 posts

197 months

Sunday 19th September 2010
quotequote all
And still maintain a safe following distance?

y2blade

56,318 posts

244 months

Sunday 19th September 2010
quotequote all
legal you say?


tell that to your insurance company after you've rear-ended someone at speed due to being too close to react or see what is going on ahead


idiot

berg1

224 posts

202 months

Sunday 19th September 2010
quotequote all
Often do it. I find national express coaches give a good compromise between speed and economy.

Baffled Spoon

5,258 posts

223 months

Sunday 19th September 2010
quotequote all
TheStoat said:
Try looking for the Mythbusters episode. The results weren't encouraging frown
The Mythbusters episodebiggrin

spudgun GB

Original Poster:

461 posts

197 months

Sunday 19th September 2010
quotequote all
chopper602 said:
I used to do that through Europe in my 2CV, stick behind a tall van or truck (Sprinters were good), and then could back off to about half throttle. Worked very well for me!

Once followed a lorry at about 65 for over 100 miles, he knew I was there and would indicate nice and early before any lane changes. When he eventually left the autobahn, he waved and gave me a thumb
I think the guy in the van kind of got the message as well. Like you mentioned, he soon twigged what I was up to so there was no nasty suprises.

With the roof down it was easy to fine tune the distance with a reduction in the buffeting.
Sweet.

spudgun GB

Original Poster:

461 posts

197 months

Sunday 19th September 2010
quotequote all
y2blade said:
legal you say?


tell that to your insurance company after you've rear-ended someone at speed due to being too close to react or see what is going on ahead


idiot
Seriously, I know exactly where your coming from. Definately NOT dangerously close. I wouldn't do it.
If it was a toss up between that and saving a few pence it wouldn't happen.


Edited by spudgun GB on Sunday 19th September 20:04

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

227 months

Sunday 19th September 2010
quotequote all
Fuel saving possibly - downside reduced safety while doing so ie you'll have to stop much sooner so reaction time needs to be improved plus with no visability you cannot react before the car directly onfront of you.

Is that really worth saving a few £'s? To me 100% nope. If fuel economy is what your after buy the new polo bluemotion or golf bluemotion or the mk1 insight.

Richard-G

1,743 posts

204 months

Sunday 19th September 2010
quotequote all
spudgun GB said:
y2blade said:
legal you say?


tell that to your insurance company after you've rear-ended someone at speed due to being too close to react or see what is going on ahead


idiot
Seriously, I know exactly where your coming from. Definately NOT dangerously close. I wouldn't do it.
If it was a toss up between that and saving a few pence it wouldn't happen.


Edited by spudgun GB on Sunday 19th September 20:04
y2blade are you going through the 'turn' or are you just an angry man/woman? Every post you make is angry, ctfo. OP I have tried this but im too scared about stone chips......

spudgun GB

Original Poster:

461 posts

197 months

Sunday 19th September 2010
quotequote all
Richard-G said:
spudgun GB said:
y2blade said:
legal you say?


tell that to your insurance company after you've rear-ended someone at speed due to being too close to react or see what is going on ahead


idiot
Seriously, I know exactly where your coming from. Definately NOT dangerously close. I wouldn't do it.
If it was a toss up between that and saving a few pence it wouldn't happen.


Edited by spudgun GB on Sunday 19th September 20:04
y2blade are you going through the 'turn' or are you just an angry man/woman? Every post you make is angry, ctfo. OP I have tried this but im too scared about stone chips......
I do get where yblade is coming from, i do. We had a bloody berlingo driving so close up our arse on the A358 that we couldn't see his headlights. It ain't clever or big.

I think the thing is the other halfs car is quite old and maybe not as aerodynamic as more modern metal. We did have the roof down and the feeling of drag reduction was quite noticable even from a resonable distance, well, by the fact there was less buffeting and wind noise.

y2blade

56,318 posts

244 months

Sunday 19th September 2010
quotequote all
spudgun GB said:
y2blade said:
legal you say?


tell that to your insurance company after you've rear-ended someone at speed due to being too close to react or see what is going on ahead


idiot
Seriously, I know exactly where your coming from. Definately NOT dangerously close. I wouldn't do it.
If it was a toss up between that and saving a few pence it wouldn't happen.


Edited by spudgun GB on Sunday 19th September 20:04
fair enough smile

pilchardthecat

7,483 posts

208 months

Sunday 19th September 2010
quotequote all
Richard-G said:
y2blade are you going through the 'turn' or are you just an angry man/woman? Every post you make is angry, ctfo.
Give him a break, he's just started spending half his life inside a Volvo diesel, he's entitled to a bit of inner turmoil and the occasional display of angst.

laugh

/runs away

busta

4,504 posts

262 months

Sunday 19th September 2010
quotequote all
When I had a 50hp diesel car I used to notice a difference following other vehicles. There is a stretch of road near me where I used to struggle to keep to 70 up a couple of hills but it was never a problem if I could sit a second or so behind a van/mpv.

It did involve driving slightly closer than I'd normally do but that's science for you.

busta

4,504 posts

262 months

Sunday 19th September 2010
quotequote all
TheStoat said:
Try looking for the Mythbusters episode. The results weren't encouraging frown
They results where really good. Certainly proves that it makes a difference.

Fatman2

1,464 posts

198 months

Sunday 19th September 2010
quotequote all
TheStoat said:
Try looking for the Mythbusters episode. The results weren't encouraging frown
I've just watched the video and the results are pretty good. I think the perception of 'drafting' is perhaps incorrect as you don't have to be literally hanging off the bumper. Although still too close for me the results showed that tucking in a bit gave significant savings.

y2blade

56,318 posts

244 months

Sunday 19th September 2010
quotequote all
pilchardthecat said:
Richard-G said:
y2blade are you going through the 'turn' or are you just an angry man/woman? Every post you make is angry, ctfo.
Give him a break, he's just started spending half his life inside a Volvo diesel, he's entitled to a bit of inner turmoil and the occasional display of angst.

laugh

/runs away
biggrin