M4 bus lane goes
Author
Discussion

NoelWatson

Original Poster:

11,710 posts

271 months

Friday 1st October 2010
quotequote all
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1316710/To...

"It was John Prescott's idea and I think that says it all."

eybic

9,212 posts

203 months

Friday 1st October 2010
quotequote all
About bloody time.

Dr Doofenshmirtz

16,952 posts

229 months

Friday 1st October 2010
quotequote all
Terrible news frown
I use it quite regularly on the bike - it's wonderful!



zips up flame proof suite

edo

16,699 posts

294 months

Friday 1st October 2010
quotequote all
I've never quite understood the hatred of this. The M4 HAS to go to 2 lanes before the flyover, and the vast majority of the great unwashed couldnt merge at a lane drop if their lives depended on it.

Everyone seems to forget that before the bus lane, the M4 used to back up from the merge point.

What happens now is that lane one leaves/drops off at the junction before, and the bus lane starts - so the majority of traffic doesnt have to do any merging.

Just my 2p.

ExPat2B

2,159 posts

229 months

Friday 1st October 2010
quotequote all
Halleluja.

I use the M4 a lot and the bus lane was a stupid embuggerance. Not like there were any buses on it, just a lot of Assison bloody Lee Taxi driving like cocks as per usual.

Plotloss

67,280 posts

299 months

Friday 1st October 2010
quotequote all
edo said:
I've never quite understood the hatred of this. The M4 HAS to go to 2 lanes before the flyover, and the vast majority of the great unwashed couldnt merge at a lane drop if their lives depended on it.

Everyone seems to forget that before the bus lane, the M4 used to back up from the merge point.

What happens now is that lane one leaves/drops off at the junction before, and the bus lane starts - so the majority of traffic doesnt have to do any merging.

Just my 2p.
I did that road at rush hour every day for five years.

The concept is sound.

The reality for some reason is different, the dynamics of the road aren't helped by there being a missing lane and you sit there, looking at it and it's annoying.

The person that really needs stringing up, is the one that decided the elevated section should only be two lanes wide.

edo

16,699 posts

294 months

Friday 1st October 2010
quotequote all
You either sit in traffic looking at an empty lane, or sit in traffic looking at more traffic - it has to drop to 2 lanes, so there is no magic solution.

Personally I think whatever solution replaces it should not have a merging lane - dropping lanes off is the only solution.

flemke

23,482 posts

266 months

Friday 1st October 2010
quotequote all
edo said:
I've never quite understood the hatred of this. The M4 HAS to go to 2 lanes before the flyover, and the vast majority of the great unwashed couldnt merge at a lane drop if their lives depended on it.

Everyone seems to forget that before the bus lane, the M4 used to back up from the merge point.

What happens now is that lane one leaves/drops off at the junction before, and the bus lane starts - so the majority of traffic doesnt have to do any merging.

Just my 2p.
As the article alludes, the intolerable bit is when there is a problem on one of the two normal carriageways, forcing traffic to a crawl, whilst the empty bus lane sits there being used by no more than one vehicle a minute.
The lane's use appears to be almost exclusively for airport traffic and coaches entering London from the west. (Yes, bikers use it, but they are not vulnerable to queues.) That is to say, the bus lane is not for commuters. This lane has always been about making a political statement on the primary route into London for taxis carrying politicians and diplomats from Heathrow into the capital.

Your point about ignorance of merging principles is a fair one. How about if they put up some bloody big signs instructing people to "MERGE IN TURN"? The presence of them often seems to have a positive effect on drivers' behaviour.

grgrgray

790 posts

197 months

Friday 1st October 2010
quotequote all
flemke said:
edo said:
I've never quite understood the hatred of this. The M4 HAS to go to 2 lanes before the flyover, and the vast majority of the great unwashed couldnt merge at a lane drop if their lives depended on it.

Everyone seems to forget that before the bus lane, the M4 used to back up from the merge point.

What happens now is that lane one leaves/drops off at the junction before, and the bus lane starts - so the majority of traffic doesnt have to do any merging.

Just my 2p.
As the article alludes, the intolerable bit is when there is a problem on one of the two normal carriageways, forcing traffic to a crawl, whilst the empty bus lane sits there being used by no more than one vehicle a minute.
The lane's use appears to be almost exclusively for airport traffic and coaches entering London from the west. (Yes, bikers use it, but they are not vulnerable to queues.) That is to say, the bus lane is not for commuters. This lane has always been about making a political statement on the primary route into London for taxis carrying politicians and diplomats from Heathrow into the capital.

Your point about ignorance of merging principles is a fair one. How about if they put up some bloody big signs instructing people to "MERGE IN TURN"? The presence of them often seems to have a positive effect on drivers' behaviour.
This.

Whenever I see MiT signage then guess what? people then merge as they should

obscene

5,180 posts

214 months

Friday 1st October 2010
quotequote all
FFS. I've just found it useful as I commute in by bike and now they want to scrap it !? It's going to be fun waiting in traffic now instead of plowing past all the idiots in cars who will no doubt be blocking every lane now. frown

jdw1234

6,021 posts

244 months

Friday 1st October 2010
quotequote all
obscene said:
FFS. I've just found it useful as I commute in by bike and now they want to scrap it !? It's going to be fun waiting in traffic now instead of plowing past all the idiots in cars who will no doubt be blocking every lane now. frown
I have never seen motorbikes waiting in Motorway traffic. You just filter through right?


Alfa numeric

3,168 posts

208 months

Friday 1st October 2010
quotequote all
I've not used it that often but I think I can count on one hand the number of coaches I've seen use it, and I could count on no hands the number of busses. It seems primarily a lane for the exclusive use of people who are too rich to use the tube from Heathrow into central London and would rather take a cab.

Good riddance.

shoestring7

6,193 posts

275 months

Friday 1st October 2010
quotequote all
Dr Doofenshmirtz said:
Terrible news frown
I use it quite regularly on the bike - it's wonderful!



zips up flame proof suite
+1.

A brief relief from the stress of filtering for hours.

SS7

obscene

5,180 posts

214 months

Friday 1st October 2010
quotequote all
jdw1234 said:
obscene said:
FFS. I've just found it useful as I commute in by bike and now they want to scrap it !? It's going to be fun waiting in traffic now instead of plowing past all the idiots in cars who will no doubt be blocking every lane now. frown
I have never seen motorbikes waiting in Motorway traffic. You just filter through right?
I'd rather have less risk for 3.5 miles than risking it with idiots trying to kill me but as for your question depends on space. I have wider mirrors on my bike which makes me unable to fit in some of the gaps other bikes could easily nip through. It just makes it much more of a pain in the arse going in, the bus lane provides a bit of relief and time to psych yourself up before you have to start filtering.

As mentioned above, when it filters down to 2 lanes it's still going to be a pain in the backside. I can't see why they've bothered to change it now to be perfectly honest even from a car point of view.

Daniel1

2,931 posts

227 months

Friday 1st October 2010
quotequote all
edo said:
You either sit in traffic looking at an empty lane, or sit in traffic looking at more traffic - it has to drop to 2 lanes, so there is no magic solution.

Personally I think whatever solution replaces it should not have a merging lane - dropping lanes off is the only solution.
agreed.

As someone else posted earlier too, you have to merge for the flyover, it just so happens you currently queue at the start of the bus lane, now you will just have to queue at the end of it. Save your £400,000 and do something else with it.

sleep envy

62,260 posts

278 months

Friday 1st October 2010
quotequote all
Plotloss said:
The person that really needs stringing up, is the one that decided the elevated section should only be two lanes wide.
who was holding the purse strings at the time?

obscene

5,180 posts

214 months

Friday 1st October 2010
quotequote all
shoestring7 said:
Dr Doofenshmirtz said:
Terrible news frown
I use it quite regularly on the bike - it's wonderful!



zips up flame proof suite
+1.

A brief relief from the stress of filtering for hours.

SS7
Didn't see that as I just posted. Glad you think the same! smile

Plotloss

67,280 posts

299 months

Friday 1st October 2010
quotequote all
sleep envy said:
Plotloss said:
The person that really needs stringing up, is the one that decided the elevated section should only be two lanes wide.
who was holding the purse strings at the time?
Built in 1965 apparently. Ahh, so that would be Harold Wilson.

Did you know that the road surface of the elevated section is heated? I didn't...

sleep envy

62,260 posts

278 months

Friday 1st October 2010
quotequote all
Plotloss said:
sleep envy said:
Plotloss said:
The person that really needs stringing up, is the one that decided the elevated section should only be two lanes wide.
who was holding the purse strings at the time?
Built in 1965 apparently. Ahh, so that would be Harold Wilson.

Did you know that the road surface of the elevated section is heated? I didn't...
nope, good factoid though

understandable for winter, wouldn't fancy seeing a HGV hitting black ice up there

Stig

11,823 posts

313 months

Friday 1st October 2010
quotequote all
ExPat2B said:
Halleluja.

I use the M4 a lot and the bus lane was a stupid embuggerance. Not like there were any buses on it, just a lot of Assison bloody Lee Taxi driving like cocks as per usual.
Why? It just means you'll be sat in 3 lanes of traffic instead of 2. You'll just get the (old) massive logjam as it goes onto the flyover.

Pointless exercise.