Cyclists who block other road users
Cyclists who block other road users
Author
Discussion

fulham911club

Original Poster:

2,046 posts

271 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
I've nothing against cyclists at all but why oh why do they insist in the centre of London during rush hour to sit directly in front of other (non-cycle) road users at the traffic lights? And then when the lights change, move off slowly in the middle of the road causing chaos...

Do they have a death-wish or something?


anonymous-user

83 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
fulham911club said:
I've nothing against cyclists at all but why oh why do they insist in the centre of London during rush hour to sit directly in front of other (non-cycle) road users at the traffic lights? And then when the lights change, move off slowly in the middle of the road causing chaos...

Do they have a death-wish or something?
I think they sit in front of cars so that cars turning don't crush them.

They move off slowly because the bike is powered by the riders legs and not an engine.

itsnotarace

4,685 posts

238 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
As above, it's the safest place to be

RRS_Staffs

648 posts

208 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all

there is usually a box where the lights are with a picture of a cyclist painted on it for the reasons mentioned above

If it also had a picture of a tt from Fulham in a 911 then I suppose you could use it too

HTH

fulham911club

Original Poster:

2,046 posts

271 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
el stovey said:
fulham911club said:
I've nothing against cyclists at all but why oh why do they insist in the centre of London during rush hour to sit directly in front of other (non-cycle) road users at the traffic lights? And then when the lights change, move off slowly in the middle of the road causing chaos...

Do they have a death-wish or something?
I think they sit in front of cars so that cars turning don't crush them.

They move off slowly because the bike is powered by the riders legs and not an engine.
Err - when there are no turns I don't see how they will get crushed other than if they stay in the middle of the road. Why can't they move to the left?

Gizmo!

18,150 posts

238 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
They - I - have as much right to be there as you do.

I don't always bother, but I've started stopping in front of cars that stop in the green box.

dylan0451

1,040 posts

220 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
RRS_Staffs said:
If it also had a picture of a tt from Fulham in a 911 then I suppose you could use it too

HTH
rofl

fulham911club

Original Poster:

2,046 posts

271 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
RRS_Staffs said:
there is usually a box where the lights are with a picture of a cyclist painted on it for the reasons mentioned above

If it also had a picture of a tt from Fulham in a 911 then I suppose you could use it too

HTH
Yes that really helps. Idiot.

alfa pint

3,856 posts

240 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
They're obviously slow cyclists in the wrong gear. I can beat any car off the line up to about 10 mph!

will_

6,035 posts

232 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
fulham911club said:
el stovey said:
fulham911club said:
I've nothing against cyclists at all but why oh why do they insist in the centre of London during rush hour to sit directly in front of other (non-cycle) road users at the traffic lights? And then when the lights change, move off slowly in the middle of the road causing chaos...

Do they have a death-wish or something?
I think they sit in front of cars so that cars turning don't crush them.

They move off slowly because the bike is powered by the riders legs and not an engine.
Err - when there are no turns I don't see how they will get crushed other than if they stay in the middle of the road. Why can't they move to the left?
Can you google map link to an example please?

Apart from ped crossings there are always turnings at lights (hence the lights).

Anyway, their avergae speed is likely to be higher than yours in rush-hour traffic - why not just sit behind and be patient rather than blasting up to the back of the next traffic queue?

fulham911club

Original Poster:

2,046 posts

271 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
To be clear:

- I was on a scooter not a 911
- This is not a cyclist bashing thread
- I have no issue with cyclists going to the front of the queue
- I do have an issue when they sit in the middle of the road and block other road users
- travel along the Embankment any day and you'll see what I mean

will_

6,035 posts

232 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
fulham911club said:
To be clear:

- I was on a scooter not a 911
- This is not a cyclist bashing thread
- I have no issue with cyclists going to the front of the queue
- I do have an issue when they sit in the middle of the road and block other road users
- travel along the Embankment any day and you'll see what I mean
I do.

Are you a scooterist who uses the cycle lanes and advanced stop boxes?

And do you have an example of a traffic light which isn't a ped crossing and where there are no turns?

ETA - that sounds rather accusatory - sorry. But there are plenty of motored two wheelers who think it's perfectly acceptable to use cycle lanes and cycle boxes, particularly on the Embankment, and it's a real piss boiler.

Edited by will_ on Tuesday 5th October 09:53

OMNIO

1,256 posts

195 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
Its because cyclists rule the road of course. They can do anything they like as long as they justify if by saying 'its safer'

retrorider

1,339 posts

230 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
OMNIO said:
Its because cyclists rule the road of course. They can do anything they like as long as they justify if by saying 'its safer'
'and greener'

will_

6,035 posts

232 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
OMNIO said:
Its because cyclists rule the road of course. They can do anything they like as long as they justify if by saying 'its safer'
OMNIO in another thread said said:
Its when two people are talking and holding everything up because they feel its safer to cycle in the middle of the road rather than to the side in single file i have an objection with.
So again you're saying it's not OK for cyclists to want to be safer? You really value your time over someone elses's safety (and therefore potentially their life)?

kambites

71,455 posts

250 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
OMNIO said:
Its because cyclists rule the road of course. They can do anything they like as long as they justify if by saying 'its safer'
So in fact, cyclists are much like car drivers. Unsurprisingly, given that they're mostly the same people.

sjg

7,675 posts

294 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
For the same reason that I turn across the front of the car at the head of a queue on my motorcycle - if you're in front, and in the way, you've put yourself in a safer position.

Plonk yourself alongside traffic at the head of the queue and it doesn't take much to get squeezed.

Accept it, London is a cycling city now where there are too many cyclists for other traffic to ignore and barge past. Wait like everyone else, overtake when safe to do so.

Davi

17,153 posts

249 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
  • yaaaaawnnns* ahhh, must be morning, time for the daily "I am incapable or reading the other 24,000 threads on exactly the same thing nor use my brain in any form of attempt to empathise with why a cyclist may cycle a tad defensively with all the wkers on the road who don't want to be held up for a millisecond" thread.
Edited by Davi on Tuesday 5th October 10:09

NDA

25,591 posts

254 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all

teen_cerbera

7,926 posts

254 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
"Most" Cyclists need to get out of their own arse, their so touchy and their "we have as much right as you so we will ride inconsideratley in the middle of the road" attitude is a real pain in my (and probably most other peoples) arse hole...