Artificial Gravity in Films
Author
Discussion

Benengo

Original Poster:

647 posts

227 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
Ok, so in 90% of films space stations/craft have a section that rotates iot create artificial g.

I was watching mission to mars (not a great film) yesterday and one character is walking on the inside of the rotating bit using (i'm guessing) centrapedal force to replace gravity. That seemed to make sense to me until another character enters the rotating section through a tunnel going through the centre of rotation where he was weightless.

My thought is if you're weightless in the middle and move to the edge you'd stay weightless as everything would just move round you? Does that mean a spinning section won't replace gravity?

Penny-lope

13,645 posts

217 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
Who forgot a title biggrin

S1MMA

2,449 posts

243 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
Benengo said:
Ok, so in 90% of films space stations/craft have a section that rotates iot create artificial g.

I was watching mission to mars (not a great film) yesterday and one character is walking on the inside of the rotating bit using (i'm guessing) centrapedal force to replace gravity. That seemed to make sense to me until another character enters the rotating section through a tunnel going through the centre of rotation where he was weightless.

My thought is if you're weightless in the middle and move to the edge you'd stay weightless as everything would just move round you? Does that mean a spinning section won't replace gravity?
Someone has too much time on their hands.

Bill

57,382 posts

279 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
You do realise Mission to Mars isn't a documentary?

anonymous-user

78 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
Bill said:
You do realise Mission to Mars isn't a documentary?
yikes


hehe

Ozone

3,076 posts

211 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
A great film wink - also why when they are all outside the spaceship and one of the crew flies off without a tether, does the woman not have enough power to rescue him? Surely you don't need the thrusters continually on to keep moving in space as it is a vacuum?

anonymous-user

78 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
Ozone said:
A great film wink - also why when they are all outside the spaceship and one of the crew flies off without a tether, does the woman not have enough power to rescue him? Surely you don't need the thrusters continually on to keep moving in space as it is a vacuum?
Woman driver. Needs constant small adjustments!!!!

Blue Meanie

73,668 posts

279 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
Unless you are stood on the spinning bit, then you would be weightless. The only reason the spinning bit 'replaces' gravi is because when you are spinning, the onward momentum of an object simply means it 'app eras' to fall to ground, when in actual fact the spinning ground is coming up to meet the object.

Don

28,378 posts

308 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
You can indeed rotate around a point and centripetal reaction force could be used to emulate gravity as I understand it. However the "gravity" would start at nothing at the centre of rotation and increase toward the maximum radius. Your head would be pulled at less than your feet.

My guess is that humans exposed to a relatively small radius artificial gravity environment would puke their guts up with appalling regularity.

Another option would be to design a craft that you attach via a very, very strong cable to a massive but compact boulder (or similar) that you then rotate around. In the craft "gravity" would then all work in one direction.

This is a problem. Given the length of even short interplanetary journeys it would be vital for human health to expose the occupants of a craft to "gravity" sufficiently to avoid muscle loss else they'd be jelly and useless by the time they got to the destination! And AG isn't an easy problem to solve.

Neil H

15,407 posts

275 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
You'd have to actually be stood on the rotating part to experience the 'gravity'. I'm not convinced it would work practically, if you jumped you could end up being hit by parts of the ship as it rotated beneath you.

Alfanatic

9,339 posts

243 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
It's the rotational motion that substitutes for gravity. This creates the centripetal force that is the substitute. If you think of it in terms of centrifugal force it will be confusing. If you aren't spinning with the spinning, um, bit, you'll experience no gravity. This means, if you were on the floor, and ran in a direction opposite to the spin but with equal speed, you'd be weightless and if you jumped up you'd float.

In fact, the act of running would be enough to make this so. On the other hand, if you ran in the same direction as the rotation you'd increase the force acting on you and you'd feel heavier. Also, the person floating from the centre access could float all the way towards the floor, and sort of walk on their hands along the floor without experiencing any gravity. They could then push against the floor rotating above their head and float all the way back to the entrance. As soon as they hold on to any part of the spinning section however, and gain some rotational motion, they will start to experience the artificial gravity.

davethebunny

740 posts

199 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
being as we don't know how gravity works in the first place, artificially creating it isn't going to be straightforward.

As said you could spin the thing, but it would have different forces at your feet and head. Like those rides at the funfair.

Although a wall of death works, doesn't it?

Edited by davethebunny on Tuesday 5th October 15:28

ZesPak

26,006 posts

220 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
The centripetal force in movies has me boggled too. What happens to everything inside of you. Essentially, if you "drop" something, it will be weightless. What happens to the contents of your stomach? Or your blood?

Simpo Two

91,436 posts

289 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
Benengo said:
My thought is if you're weightless in the middle and move to the edge you'd stay weightless as everything would just move round you? Does that mean a spinning section won't replace gravity?
Put an orange in a carrier bag and whirl it round like a propellor. Same thing.

308mate

13,758 posts

246 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
The only one that comes to mind is in Notting Hill, where the disabled sister invites Hugh Grant and Julia Roberts round for dinner. The roast was burnt but the gravy looked real enough.

rustypole

2 posts

187 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
I am sure I read somewhere that the difference in gravity between the head and feet of a human had to be very small in order for them not to feel ill.

in order to make it this small the "centrifuge" would need to be 1000m in diameter

Bill

57,382 posts

279 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
davethebunny said:
being as we don't know how gravity works in the first place, artificially creating it isn't going to be straightforward.

As said you could spin the thing, but it would have different forces at your feet and head. Like those rides at the funfair.

Although a wall of death works, doesn't it?
We don't know how gravity works but IIRC from a level physics it's an attractive force between masses that can be demonstrated in the lab.

The thing about the centripetal forces involved in cinematic artficial gravity scenarios is that they require gravity to work... Without gravity there isn't anything to keep you stuck to the cylinder if you let go.

CypherP

4,425 posts

216 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
308mate said:
The only one that comes to mind is in Notting Hill, where the disabled sister invites Hugh Grant and Julia Roberts round for dinner. The roast was burnt but the gravy looked real enough.
hehe

Eric Mc

124,879 posts

289 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
About 53 seconds in. Watch the astronaut running around the lockers.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYsKGDJe4zE

Neil H

15,407 posts

275 months

Tuesday 5th October 2010
quotequote all
davethebunny said:
being as we don't know how gravity works in the first place
Not strictly true, gravity is pretty well understood.