Council removes traffic light controls - guess what happens?
Council removes traffic light controls - guess what happens?
Author
Discussion

Parrot of Doom

Original Poster:

23,075 posts

263 months

Sunday 10th October 2010
quotequote all
http://www.wimp.com/trafficlights/

This is absolutely true of just about every junction I've ever crossed, where the lights have failed. Its a bloody doddle.

Gizmo!

18,150 posts

238 months

Sunday 10th October 2010
quotequote all
Fascinating. A whole town in Germany did something similar a while back and it worked also.

(Takes me back seeing Portishead... I used to hang about there a lot many years ago).

roscozs

477 posts

210 months

Sunday 10th October 2010
quotequote all
In Carlisle after the floods in 2005, the traffic lights failed at hardwicke circus roundabout. The traffic ran so smoothly and reduced congestion to such an extent that they changed the system to part time signals. It has completely transformed the city for driving at off peak hours.

Edited by roscozs on Sunday 10th October 20:57

varsas

4,075 posts

231 months

Sunday 10th October 2010
quotequote all
Good video, I've heard about these sorts of schemes before. High Wycombe has been going the opposite way for about 10 years now; I just don't drive in town anymore (which might actually be the point!)

runboy

244 posts

210 months

Sunday 10th October 2010
quotequote all
Happens round my city too - traffic lights go out and traffic runs just as smooth, if not better. Less traffic held up, less pollution, less stop/start traffic. I've said it to myself before that if the government were happy to fund proper traffic wardens across the country then at rush hour they could turn off the traffic lights and let a human being control the flow.

Trouble is, does it mean that traffic just gets to the next pinch-point quicker so in the big scheme of things does it really help. Hmmmmm.....

kambites

71,453 posts

250 months

Sunday 10th October 2010
quotequote all
Every now and then one of the sets of traffic lights on my route to work stops working (they're only on part of the time and the clock seems to sometimes go mad) and it at least doubles my journey time. There are one or two around here that I think the traffic might flow better without, but the majority are necessary.

Munter

31,331 posts

270 months

Sunday 10th October 2010
quotequote all
kambites said:
Every now and then one of the sets of traffic lights on my route to work stops working (they're only on part of the time and the clock seems to sometimes go mad) and it at least doubles my journey time. There are one or two around here that I think the traffic might flow better without, but the majority are necessary.
Quite often when they fail one "route" clears much quicker. And quite often that route is the main flow of traffic. But at the expense of one or more of the other minor routes.... which jam up.

Frimley111R

19,180 posts

263 months

Sunday 10th October 2010
quotequote all
I heard the govt are actively looking into this issue with a view to freeing up road traffic which is good news.

BliarOut

72,863 posts

268 months

Sunday 10th October 2010
quotequote all
We never had lights round here and we had very little congestion. Now some tt has started putting them everywhere and guess what, Gridlock.

I'd love to kick the s that make these decisions in the 'nads with a pair of steelies...

phil1967

336 posts

221 months

Sunday 10th October 2010
quotequote all
I am a fan of shared space initiatives (I work in a Highways department for a Council), but traffic lights are necessary in some places for pedestrians too. However, there are many that can be removed and it would make improvements no end.

kambites

71,453 posts

250 months

Sunday 10th October 2010
quotequote all
Munter said:
kambites said:
Every now and then one of the sets of traffic lights on my route to work stops working (they're only on part of the time and the clock seems to sometimes go mad) and it at least doubles my journey time. There are one or two around here that I think the traffic might flow better without, but the majority are necessary.
Quite often when they fail one "route" clears much quicker. And quite often that route is the main flow of traffic. But at the expense of one or more of the other minor routes.... which jam up.
I would imagine that's the point of most of them.

Nickyboy

6,824 posts

263 months

Sunday 10th October 2010
quotequote all
Problem is that for some reason here virtually all traffic light controls are done by timer, other countries use some kind of vehicle monitoring so changes the lights when there is actually a need not just after a set time. They used this on the A34 junction at Didcot and it transformed it from queues all the time to virtually nothing now. On the opposite thought a junction near where i work has sensors in the road and trucks travelling in the opposite direction trigger the ones for a right turn as they pass so you sit there for 30 seconds for nothing as they go through their sequence.

BliarOut

72,863 posts

268 months

Sunday 10th October 2010
quotequote all
phil1967 said:
I am a fan of shared space initiatives (I work in a Highways department for a Council), but traffic lights are necessary in some places for pedestrians too. However, there are many that can be removed and it would make improvements no end.
Just checking you're not in Peterborough or your 'nads would be toast. We have always had roundabouts, footbridges and underpasses and no lights and it worked a treat.

Some tt has bought a job lot of lights and needs ritually killing and putting on display at the City limits yes

Tunku

7,703 posts

257 months

Sunday 10th October 2010
quotequote all
We have a monstrosity called the Gogarburn roundabout in Edinburgh. When it was built, it was a simple, if big roundabout. It worked like any other roundabout. The council then decided to 'tweak' it using traffic lights with different phasing at different times of day. The upshot is that at full rush hour time you are controlled by traffic lights that encourage trying to be last man across on the major routes into it, causing huge tailbacks and gridlock on the actual roundabout. When I use it at 23.00 hrs to go all the way round it, it stops me at every entry on, so I have to stop three time and idle for no other traffic. Green Council credentials eh?

phil1967

336 posts

221 months

Sunday 10th October 2010
quotequote all
I'm a petrolhead foremost and to be more accurate, I'm in waste management dept for Highways. No nad chopping please.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

284 months

Sunday 10th October 2010
quotequote all
I'd love to show this to Ken Livingstone and watch his brain explode...


Speed_Demon

2,662 posts

217 months

Sunday 10th October 2010
quotequote all
Tunku said:
We have a monstrosity called the Gogarburn roundabout in Edinburgh. When it was built, it was a simple, if big roundabout. It worked like any other roundabout. The council then decided to 'tweak' it using traffic lights with different phasing at different times of day. The upshot is that at full rush hour time you are controlled by traffic lights that encourage trying to be last man across on the major routes into it, causing huge tailbacks and gridlock on the actual roundabout. When I use it at 23.00 hrs to go all the way round it, it stops me at every entry on, so I have to stop three time and idle for no other traffic. Green Council credentials eh?
Reminds me of J7 of the A1M.

Part time lights, recently became full time. Absolutely pointless to the extreme. Means I can no longer nail it round at 60 either *sigh*

FunkyNige

9,815 posts

304 months

Sunday 10th October 2010
quotequote all
On the other hand, Norfolk council built a new roundabout on the A47 ( here) that now means people who take a little rat run through some lanes now have right of way onto this junction over the people on the A47 (in the mornings when traffic is heading towards Norwich). The result? Massive traffic jams every morning, more people using the rat runs and talk of putting traffic lights on the roundabout rolleyes