The ultimate 'no formula' race car? (virtual content)
The ultimate 'no formula' race car? (virtual content)
Author
Discussion

Sway

Original Poster:

35,048 posts

223 months

Tuesday 19th October 2010
quotequote all
So it seems Adrian Newey has been busy working for Polyphony Digital, to create the Red Bull X1 for GT5...

http://www.gtplanet.net/gran-turismo-5s-red-bull-x...

I can see some major improvments over current formula cars, but is this really the design direction everybody would take if the design rules were completely freed up?

Would there be benefits in closing over the suspension, making a super LMP style car?

Or would the student Newey's design I saw a couple of years ago be better? (Looked like a armadillo, for high downforce low drag)

In other words, if CanAm came around again, what would people be driving?

groomi

9,331 posts

272 months

Tuesday 19th October 2010
quotequote all
Sway said:
Would there be benefits in closing over the suspension, making a super LMP style car?
Simply closing it over (like an 80's Group C Prototype) creates a large frontal area which isn't too great either. A modern LMP is pretty much a halfway house between Group C and F1, so the design direction is certainly heading towards Newey's concept anyway.

Agoogy

7,274 posts

277 months

Tuesday 19th October 2010
quotequote all
Looks like a Caparo...

Forbes82

812 posts

208 months

Tuesday 19th October 2010
quotequote all
Surely it should have some form of rear wing stalling device?

tim-b

1,279 posts

239 months

Tuesday 19th October 2010
quotequote all
Maybe needs some big bumpers too...hehe

TheArchitect

1,238 posts

208 months

Tuesday 19th October 2010
quotequote all
Looks stunning, would be good to see if red bull win the WDC and WCC they release something like this for real!

Jungles

3,587 posts

250 months

Tuesday 19th October 2010
quotequote all
Gas turbine engine? I presume that turbine produces electricity to power an electric motor, rather than delivering power directly to the transmission and driving wheels, otherwise "turbo lag" would have a completely new meaning!

Mazda Baiter

37,069 posts

217 months

Tuesday 19th October 2010
quotequote all
Jungles said:
Gas turbine engine? I presume that turbine produces electricity to power an electric motor, rather than delivering power directly to the transmission and driving wheels, otherwise "turbo lag" would have a completely new meaning!
Newey was at Williams when they made their CVT car. I imagine that the turbine would be run at a constant speed eliminating lag.

Nick M

3,632 posts

252 months

Tuesday 19th October 2010
quotequote all
Jungles said:
Gas turbine engine? I presume that turbine produces electricity to power an electric motor, rather than delivering power directly to the transmission and driving wheels, otherwise "turbo lag" would have a completely new meaning!
The Howmet TX gas turbine car addressed this back in the 60's:

"The TS325 engine comprised a two-stage gas generating turbine driving the two-stage compressor while also providing gas to the power turbine whose output shaft, via reduction gearing, drove the rear wheels. Heppenstall's solution to the turbine lag was to insert a wastegate bet ween the gas-generating and the power turbines. The first third of throttle pedal movement controlled fuel supply to the combustion chambers, and thus the speed of the engine. But once spinning at its maximum 57,500 rpm and delivering full power, the final two-thirds throttle movement activated the wastegate, thus controlling the amount of gas directed to the power turbine, and hence the rear wheels."

Rest of the article here. Quite interesting

http://website.lineone.net/~pete.stowe/pete_howmet...

F1GTRUeno

6,512 posts

247 months

Tuesday 19th October 2010
quotequote all
He created something uglier than current LMP and F1 cars, impressive.

SystemParanoia

14,343 posts

227 months

Tuesday 19th October 2010
quotequote all
Brabham meets howmet biggrin

id love to see the size of the Exhaust Bypass wastegate biggrinbiggrin

Forbes82

812 posts

208 months

Tuesday 19th October 2010
quotequote all
Nick M said:
Jungles said:
Gas turbine engine? I presume that turbine produces electricity to power an electric motor, rather than delivering power directly to the transmission and driving wheels, otherwise "turbo lag" would have a completely new meaning!
The Howmet TX gas turbine car addressed this back in the 60's:

"The TS325 engine comprised a two-stage gas generating turbine driving the two-stage compressor while also providing gas to the power turbine whose output shaft, via reduction gearing, drove the rear wheels. Heppenstall's solution to the turbine lag was to insert a wastegate bet ween the gas-generating and the power turbines. The first third of throttle pedal movement controlled fuel supply to the combustion chambers, and thus the speed of the engine. But once spinning at its maximum 57,500 rpm and delivering full power, the final two-thirds throttle movement activated the wastegate, thus controlling the amount of gas directed to the power turbine, and hence the rear wheels."

Rest of the article here. Quite interesting

http://website.lineone.net/~pete.stowe/pete_howmet...
Watched it at Le Mans CLassic this year, fantastic sound!

davepoth

29,395 posts

228 months

Tuesday 19th October 2010
quotequote all
It wouldn't need a rear wing stalling device, it has a massive fan sucking the car to the road so it will be running virtually no rear wing anyway.

compocon

137 posts

193 months

Tuesday 19th October 2010
quotequote all
More marketing than substance me thinks

GTP rpm

4,506 posts

225 months

Tuesday 19th October 2010
quotequote all
compocon said:
More marketing than substance me thinks
+1

chevronb37

6,472 posts

215 months

Tuesday 19th October 2010
quotequote all
Looks remarkably similar to the concept Gordon Murray came up with for MotorSport magazine some years ago. Would be fun to see one for real, but the limiting factor would be the driver - how much could the body take?

SystemParanoia

14,343 posts

227 months

Tuesday 19th October 2010
quotequote all
does it matter?

there will always be someone willing to drive/race it!

Edited by SystemParanoia on Tuesday 19th October 20:43

mrmr96

13,736 posts

233 months

Tuesday 19th October 2010
quotequote all
GTP rpm said:
compocon said:
More marketing than substance me thinks
+1
Hahah! No st sherlock!

davepoth

29,395 posts

228 months

Tuesday 19th October 2010
quotequote all
compocon said:
More marketing than substance me thinks
And Formula 1 isn't?

GTP rpm

4,506 posts

225 months

Tuesday 19th October 2010
quotequote all
davepoth said:
compocon said:
More marketing than substance me thinks
And Formula 1 isn't?
Well...for starters, F1's actually exist!

tongue out