No claims bonus - what's it worth?
No claims bonus - what's it worth?
Author
Discussion

LeoSayer

Original Poster:

7,686 posts

267 months

Thursday 21st October 2010
quotequote all
I renewed my car insurance recently and there was some debate over whether I had a 6 or 7 years NCB. Rather than go to the trouble of getting evidence of 7 years NCB I agreed with my new insurer that I would state 6 years as there was only a £5 price difference (ie. 1% of the value of the policy).

Are NCBs and NCB protection worth anything these days?

redstu

2,287 posts

262 months

Thursday 21st October 2010
quotequote all
I thought 5 years was the max that they gave?

RB Will

10,676 posts

263 months

Thursday 21st October 2010
quotequote all
I think my 7 years = about 72.5% off. No idea what the difference between the years of bonus is though.

Z4STER

46 posts

214 months

Thursday 21st October 2010
quotequote all
Just had exactly the same 6 or 7 years NCD issue. Difference was £48.. so called back old insurance co. and found I did actually have 7 years, so saved £48..


ZOLLAR

19,920 posts

196 months

Thursday 21st October 2010
quotequote all
It'll vary per insurer, some insurance companies don't work on a set % reduction for NCB it'll depend on the risk of the policy.
Although at 5 years your usually getting the biggest discount you may see a slight difference between 7-9 years and 9-12 years but as i said it'll vary per insurer.

Tomatogti

383 posts

192 months

Thursday 21st October 2010
quotequote all
What I've never quite understood is why you would pay to protect your no claims bonus. Say you've paid to protect it and you then have an accident. When you next come to insure your car and you ring round the companies, you have to declare all accidents/claims etc - why would telling them you've paid to protect your NCB make the slightest difference to the price you get quoted on renewal. Surely you're still the same risk so the premium would be the same? Am I missing something here?

Truckosaurus

12,927 posts

307 months

Thursday 21st October 2010
quotequote all
Tomatogti said:
Am I missing something here?
Maybe.

eg: Before claim someone might be quoted a premium of £1000 but they have a 50% NCD, so pays £500. After a claim the premium might be £2000 but with a protected NCD they'd pay £1000 rather than the full £2000.

This does make the assumption that the pre-discount premium is calculated without consideration of subsequent discounts (which I'm always cynical it doesn't).

mattviatura

2,996 posts

223 months

Thursday 21st October 2010
quotequote all
Tomatogti said:
What I've never quite understood is why you would pay to protect your no claims bonus. Say you've paid to protect it and you then have an accident. When you next come to insure your car and you ring round the companies, you have to declare all accidents/claims etc - why would telling them you've paid to protect your NCB make the slightest difference to the price you get quoted on renewal. Surely you're still the same risk so the premium would be the same? Am I missing something here?
I agree, that has always struck me as a con. Sure, if you go back to the same company at renewal they'll reapply your bonus but the premium will still be loaded because of the accident/loss and any other insurer will also load accordingly.

ZOLLAR

19,920 posts

196 months

Thursday 21st October 2010
quotequote all
mattviatura said:
Tomatogti said:
What I've never quite understood is why you would pay to protect your no claims bonus. Say you've paid to protect it and you then have an accident. When you next come to insure your car and you ring round the companies, you have to declare all accidents/claims etc - why would telling them you've paid to protect your NCB make the slightest difference to the price you get quoted on renewal. Surely you're still the same risk so the premium would be the same? Am I missing something here?
I agree, that has always struck me as a con. Sure, if you go back to the same company at renewal they'll reapply your bonus but the premium will still be loaded because of the accident/loss and any other insurer will also load accordingly.
You pay to protect you no claims bonus discount not your insurance premium , so at renewal if you've had an accident with PNCB you still get the same discount but you've had an accident so are a higher risk which will be reflected in the price.

Jobbo

13,613 posts

287 months

Thursday 21st October 2010
quotequote all
redstu said:
I thought 5 years was the max that they gave?
Different insurers have different maximums for their own purposes. Admiral gave me proof of NCB showing 13 years; however, I should have about 16 years but at one point insured with an insurer (Tesco, I think) who treated 6 years as the maximum. So I gave them my proof of 8 years at commencement and then ended up with proof of 6 years when I moved insurer at the end of the year. Grrr!

nottyash

4,671 posts

218 months

Thursday 21st October 2010
quotequote all
I have 2 policys one with 7 yrs NCB and the other with just 1 yr.
On a quote for My Imported Subaru Legacy B4 RSK it was £590 with 7 yrs NCB and £640 with the 1 years NCB. Both quotes with Admiral.
Crazy!!confused

Deluded

4,968 posts

214 months

Thursday 21st October 2010
quotequote all
Worth fk all in my experience. My insurance hasn't changed in years.

Diesel Meister

2,045 posts

224 months

Thursday 21st October 2010
quotequote all

A close friend working in the industry, quoted off the record:

"Motor insurance is a distress purchase. Avoid being abused where you can, oherwise suck it up. Or walk."

I think this is harsh but just about sums it up. All you can do is avoid (i) paying over much more than you're comfortable with (difficult, even with a "sensible" car) and/or (ii) having to claim (not entirely within your control).

  • Sigh*

redtwin

7,518 posts

205 months

Thursday 21st October 2010
quotequote all
In my case it is worth a great deal...to the insurers.

My premium went from £380 last year to £640 this year and the only thing that changed was that I had one more year of NCB. rolleyes

mattviatura

2,996 posts

223 months

Thursday 21st October 2010
quotequote all
ZOLLAR said:
You pay to protect you no claims bonus discount not your insurance premium , so at renewal if you've had an accident with PNCB you still get the same discount but you've had an accident so are a higher risk which will be reflected in the price.
Ergo it's a waste of money. I'm not bothered how the discount is made up, it doesn't matter. What matters is the price. Which will be higher in the event of a claim regardless of whether or not NCB was protected.

edited for Muppetry

Edited by mattviatura on Thursday 21st October 17:48

Doofus

33,117 posts

196 months

Thursday 21st October 2010
quotequote all
No Claims Discount isn't a right, and it isn't legislation. It's a marketing gimmick used by insurers who can do whatever they want with it. They can give as much as they want, and they can value it however they like.

You're not entitled to it

LeoSayer

Original Poster:

7,686 posts

267 months

Friday 22nd October 2010
quotequote all
I’ve always thought it was a gimmick. If you’ve had 3 claims in the past 5 years (which you are obliged to mention when getting a quote) then surely a 10 year no claims bonus (thanks to protection) is meaningless.

However I guess that it is an indication of a driving and insurance record. If you haven’t driven for the past 5 years then you will have a spotless record, however a no-claims discount (which expires if you’re not insured for 2 years) proves you have been insured and presumably, driving. That must lower your risk in the eyes of the insurer.

Another oddity is that I made a claim on a classic car policy, it didn’t affect my no claims bonus which was on another policy. For some reason, classic policies don’t take account of no-claims bonus.