Its getting a bit ridiculous.
Its getting a bit ridiculous.
Author
Discussion

focused

Original Poster:

1,411 posts

312 months

Friday 9th April 2004
quotequote all
Police plan to use hidden speed cameras

This week the police have stepped up their war on the motorist.

John Reynolds, Chairman of Cambridgeshire Police Authority said: "If motorists succeed in outsmarting speed traps their reward could be hidden cameras."

Mr Reynolds questioned the devices being painted bright yellow and putting them in visible places.

Comparing speeding motorists to drug dealers and rogue traders Reynolds said:

"If people do not abide by the law then those that legislate may decide to take action."

Car Parts Direct, the company that market the Quintezz XT7000 Radar detection system has seen a huge upsurge in business. They offer a £60-Cashback guarantee for anyone caught speeding by a Gatso camera or laser gun.

Mark Cornwall of Car Parts Direct said: "The £60 Cash-back is great for the customer. It demonstrates our 100% belief in the product. Sales of the Quintezz have increased 20 fold in the last few weeks. At the same time the integrity of the police has taken a severe bashing. This is all down to the misuse of speed cameras."

No licence means no car. No job. No income and no dropping the kids off at school. No shopping trips and no weekends away. Some people live in fear of another three points.

Cornwall went on to say: "Even if they hide cameras it will make no difference. They can run but they can’t hide. If the camera can find you - fit a Quintezz and you’ll find it first."

If John Reynolds gets his way the cameras will be invisible. Sales of the Quintezz will be banned - and we’ll need to live on a bus route.

Police are on target to issue over 3 million speeding tickets this year. If you would like to avoid a fine and improve the chances of keeping your driving licence check out the £199 Quintezz XT7000Plus radar detector at www.carparts-direct.co.uk or call their mail order line 0870 0110291.



Are these systems legal?

IMHO I think its getting totally out of hand. The attitude the police have adopted is just causing a greater void between drivers and the BiB.

We are now as bad as "drug dealers and rogue traders". So I'm compared to a lunatic selling class A drugs to kids am I? Next I will get a criminal record for travelling at 45 mph in a 40 mph zone.



Apologies if seen before.



jeffreyarcher

675 posts

278 months

Friday 9th April 2004
quotequote all
focused said:
Car Parts Direct, the company that market the Quintezz XT7000 Radar detection system has seen a huge upsurge in business. They offer a £60-Cashback guarantee for anyone caught speeding by a Gatso camera or laser gun.


So, is it a detector or a laser jammer? If it's not a jammer, how can they offer the guarantee? Is it just a loss leader?

>> Edited by jeffreyarcher on Friday 9th April 21:19

focused

Original Poster:

1,411 posts

312 months

Saturday 10th April 2004
quotequote all
Their web-site says its a detector. The £60.00 is only offered for the first year and you would, of course, still get the points on your license.

I might get one anyway, there are so many cameras around now, it only takes a moments lapse of concentration and you get 3 points.

nonegreen

7,803 posts

300 months

Saturday 10th April 2004
quotequote all
No, its been very very ridiculous for a long time. Its high time there was a serious revolt that overthrew the scummy government and started the long road back to sommon sense.

cortinaman

3,230 posts

283 months

Saturday 10th April 2004
quotequote all
if this is regarding the article in 'nuts' magazine (the mag for bullshat)dated 9-15th april then i doubt if anyone has anything to worry about. the picture of the so-called 'camera' looked like an ever-ready rear light for a pushbike mounted inside a bit of swollen plastic....not convincing at-all and thats just one shot of the thing,the other shot makes it look like the outer ring of a car version of an aircraft fuel filler with a lightbulb shoved in the center.....those are from just looking at the thing.....as for the supposed spokesman saying "any new cameras are subject to home office approval and these dont SOUND like they would meet the criteria" would suggest that the person knew absolutely naff all about these things.

afaik its a load of old bollocks.

>> Edited by cortinaman on Saturday 10th April 03:08

streaky

19,311 posts

279 months

Saturday 10th April 2004
quotequote all
John Reynolds is clearly of the Brumsturmfurher school of thinking - Streaky

deltaf

6,806 posts

283 months

Saturday 10th April 2004
quotequote all
John Reynolds...cough! anus! Cough!....

autismuk

1,529 posts

270 months

Saturday 10th April 2004
quotequote all
I might be being thick here, but won't hiding them stop the "safety" aspect (i.e. them making people slow down), without affecting the radar jammers, which presumably will still jam radar ?

james_j

3,996 posts

285 months

Saturday 10th April 2004
quotequote all
autismuk said:
I might be being thick here, but won't hiding them stop the "safety" aspect (i.e. them making people slow down), without affecting the radar jammers, which presumably will still jam radar ?


Of course it will stop any claimed (but unproven) "safety" aspect, but "safety" was only ever an excuse for revenue as most people know.

Reynolds is just getting spiteful and throwing his toys out of his pram.

OUTLAWisBACK

84 posts

270 months

Saturday 10th April 2004
quotequote all
well if the hide a few up brumstoms arss.

IUt mite stop him talking shit for a bit .

focused

Original Poster:

1,411 posts

312 months

Monday 12th April 2004
quotequote all
cortinaman said:
if this is regarding the article in 'nuts' magazine (the mag for bullshat)dated 9-15th april then i doubt if anyone has anything to worry about. the picture of the so-called 'camera' looked like an ever-ready rear light for a pushbike mounted inside a bit of swollen plastic....not convincing at-all and thats just one shot of the thing,the other shot makes it look like the outer ring of a car version of an aircraft fuel filler with a lightbulb shoved in the center.....those are from just looking at the thing.....as for the supposed spokesman saying "any new cameras are subject to home office approval and these dont SOUND like they would meet the criteria" would suggest that the person knew absolutely naff all about these things.

afaik its a load of old bollocks.

>> Edited by cortinaman on Saturday 10th April 03:08




I'm afraid not, this was an official press release only 2 days ago.

margo

533 posts

271 months

Monday 12th April 2004
quotequote all
focused said:
I'm afraid not, this was an official press release only 2 days ago.

By who ?

GCerbera

5,161 posts

281 months

Monday 12th April 2004
quotequote all
Anyone tried the Quintezz XT7000?

PetrolTed

34,468 posts

333 months

Monday 12th April 2004
quotequote all
I was sent a press release by the Quitezz people a while back all about the money back offer. They've got some good publicity out of it. I thought the release was way too cheesey and the offer pretty transparent so chose not to publish it.

doobry

6 posts

261 months

Sunday 15th January 2006
quotequote all
They've started!!

yesterday, A14, just outside cambridge what looked like a fella fixing the railing turned out to be fella sat on stool with what looked like the guts of a speed camera van on a tripod in front of him, no van in sight..

And this a couple of weeks after they are announced as being almost at the bottom of the speed camera revenue tables...

eccles

14,390 posts

252 months

Sunday 15th January 2006
quotequote all
sure it wasn't a road tax camera thingy? they are often on a tripod on a long lead, with the van parked off to the side. often seen just outside ipswich.

doobry

6 posts

261 months

Sunday 15th January 2006
quotequote all
I'll let you know in the next fortnight!

here's hoping!

Prof Beard

6,669 posts

257 months