£1-£1.5k skinny wrist watch
Discussion
Just had my first proper grown up job paycheck and have got the watch itch.
Currently have a Tag Aquaracer and a Seiko 5 - both of which fit my tiny girly wrists fine.
Currently fantasising about a Ball Engineer Hydrocarbon, they look fairly chunky, but the dimensions don't seem too OTT - never actually tried one on though, so it's difficult to gauge. Anyone with small wrists tried/own one and have an opinion?
Failing that, any other recommendations for people with twig arms?
Currently have a Tag Aquaracer and a Seiko 5 - both of which fit my tiny girly wrists fine.
Currently fantasising about a Ball Engineer Hydrocarbon, they look fairly chunky, but the dimensions don't seem too OTT - never actually tried one on though, so it's difficult to gauge. Anyone with small wrists tried/own one and have an opinion?
Failing that, any other recommendations for people with twig arms?
My immediate reaction to that Nomos was "no way, that is something my grandad would have worn" but it looks nicer the longer I look at it.
I think the Ball is still the forerunner - unfortunately it is the bigger ones that I _really_ like - the spacemaster is gorgeous (as are yours Nemesis) but I reckon it may be a little big (and also slightly out of budget - but when has that ever stopped anyone?) the best of the rest has to be the midsize, still not 100% on it though.
By the sounds of it, I will be getting sent to Abu Dhabi in a few months anyway, so this might get put on the back burner until then.
I think the Ball is still the forerunner - unfortunately it is the bigger ones that I _really_ like - the spacemaster is gorgeous (as are yours Nemesis) but I reckon it may be a little big (and also slightly out of budget - but when has that ever stopped anyone?) the best of the rest has to be the midsize, still not 100% on it though.
By the sounds of it, I will be getting sent to Abu Dhabi in a few months anyway, so this might get put on the back burner until then.
They do look quite nice well interesting anyway. I'm tempted to buy one have the main case and crown DLC'D black and the glass guard and caseback PVD'D with a very hard copper coating!
Definitely very tempted.
Can't be that bad hell Schwarzenegger wears one!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d73K5h7ofVQ&fea...
Bry
Definitely very tempted.
Can't be that bad hell Schwarzenegger wears one!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d73K5h7ofVQ&fea...
Bry
Edited by bry1975 on Sunday 7th November 12:44
What about these:-
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ZLATOUST-original-russian-di...
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Zlatoust-Vintage-Russian-Mil...
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ZLATOUST-original-russian-di...
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Zlatoust-Vintage-Russian-Mil...
Edited by bry1975 on Sunday 7th November 22:09
Edited by bry1975 on Sunday 7th November 22:25
Apologies for chuckle but WTF is a website doing calling itself 'omegarolex.com' ???? Nice try boys…
And on a note for a 'skinny' wrist - realistically, how skinny *are* your wrists? I consider myself to be very thin, any muscle I *do* have is concentrated in my legs (I can run a bit, or used to be able to) and have virtually no upper body strength. My arms are twig-like. To me, 40mm was the absolute maximum I could go for watch size, and found a steel Daytona to be pretty much a perfect fit.
However after very nervously buying my first 42mm watch (IWC aquatimer) I've found that it's not the absolute diameter that matters quite so much as the case design, and especially the lug curvature.
My Tudor HC is big, the biggest watch I own really - but it's my current daily. It's comfortable, if a bit heavy. It is probably bigger than the IWC doppelchrono, but when I tried on the Doppel my girlfriend instantly said 'NO' as it looked far too big on my wrist. Maybe try some 40mm watches, you can't be *that* much thinner than me, honestly.
Alternatively, I've got a 2000 model year limited edition Omega speedmaster for sale - the Schumacher 'Racing' limited edition with the silver face. That's 38mm and feels rather small these days, but if you're *really* concerned about size, it's a great watch to go for.
If you're not in the market for a used watch (mine is bang in your budget) then look at other Speedy 'Reduced' models - they are the same size. The original Moon Watch Speedmasters are considerably bigger. Some people look down on the Reduced models but hey, Omega chose the Reduced for the Schumacher series and they've not lost any money… only downside is that it's not classified as waterproof, and doesn't have a date, hence isn't possible as a daily wear for me (I have silly requirements). But I have it, with original steel bracelet and lovely ATG racing perforated leather strap (which suits it MUCH better) if you're interested.
Omega still make the Speedy new in Reduced size don't they? Not sure of the price of those though.
Also if you're considering a used watch (you REALLY SHOULD, brand new mid-market watches are a waste of money in general) then you've got to consider an older steel Rolex Air-King or similar - they're around 38mm and plain, simple and available at £1500 last time I looked...
And on a note for a 'skinny' wrist - realistically, how skinny *are* your wrists? I consider myself to be very thin, any muscle I *do* have is concentrated in my legs (I can run a bit, or used to be able to) and have virtually no upper body strength. My arms are twig-like. To me, 40mm was the absolute maximum I could go for watch size, and found a steel Daytona to be pretty much a perfect fit.
However after very nervously buying my first 42mm watch (IWC aquatimer) I've found that it's not the absolute diameter that matters quite so much as the case design, and especially the lug curvature.
My Tudor HC is big, the biggest watch I own really - but it's my current daily. It's comfortable, if a bit heavy. It is probably bigger than the IWC doppelchrono, but when I tried on the Doppel my girlfriend instantly said 'NO' as it looked far too big on my wrist. Maybe try some 40mm watches, you can't be *that* much thinner than me, honestly.
Alternatively, I've got a 2000 model year limited edition Omega speedmaster for sale - the Schumacher 'Racing' limited edition with the silver face. That's 38mm and feels rather small these days, but if you're *really* concerned about size, it's a great watch to go for.
If you're not in the market for a used watch (mine is bang in your budget) then look at other Speedy 'Reduced' models - they are the same size. The original Moon Watch Speedmasters are considerably bigger. Some people look down on the Reduced models but hey, Omega chose the Reduced for the Schumacher series and they've not lost any money… only downside is that it's not classified as waterproof, and doesn't have a date, hence isn't possible as a daily wear for me (I have silly requirements). But I have it, with original steel bracelet and lovely ATG racing perforated leather strap (which suits it MUCH better) if you're interested.
Omega still make the Speedy new in Reduced size don't they? Not sure of the price of those though.
Also if you're considering a used watch (you REALLY SHOULD, brand new mid-market watches are a waste of money in general) then you've got to consider an older steel Rolex Air-King or similar - they're around 38mm and plain, simple and available at £1500 last time I looked...
cyberface said:
Omega still make the Speedy new in Reduced size don't they? Not sure of the price of those though.
According to the Omega website, the Speedy Reduced is no longer made. However there might be a few kicking about in AD's or via online stores. Failing that, you can't go wrong with the second hand market 
OP, I'd definitely go and try some Ball watches on to see what you think - Lovely pieces! The Spacemaster Glow is particularly nice if you're drawn to the tritium tubes
I have the EHC I, which is 40mm including the bezel. However what with the oversized lugs and weight, I find it does wear quite big. As I said, definitely worth trying one on before you make a decision 
Gassing Station | Watches | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff