cat c in classiffieds
Discussion
Cat D can be pretty light bodywork damage - not usually a concern.
Cat C a little more involved, possible chassis/suspension damage IIRC, - I'd want to have a gooooood look at it, but at that money it is an utter steal.
Cat B is parts only IIRC - must be broken?
Cat A is a must be destroyed jobbie.
Cat C a little more involved, possible chassis/suspension damage IIRC, - I'd want to have a gooooood look at it, but at that money it is an utter steal.
Cat B is parts only IIRC - must be broken?
Cat A is a must be destroyed jobbie.
BCA said:
Cat D can be pretty light bodywork damage - not usually a concern.
Cat C a little more involved, possible chassis/suspension damage IIRC, - I'd want to have a gooooood look at it, but at that money it is an utter steal.
Cat B is parts only IIRC - must be broken?
Cat A is a must be destroyed jobbie.
^^^^^^ This, give or take.Cat C a little more involved, possible chassis/suspension damage IIRC, - I'd want to have a gooooood look at it, but at that money it is an utter steal.
Cat B is parts only IIRC - must be broken?
Cat A is a must be destroyed jobbie.
Cat Cs aren't always badly damaged, just depends on the views of whoever inspected it.
Category C isn't necessarily a more badly damaged car than Category D. The difference between the categories is the percentage of the car's undamaged value required to repair it. All of it is, of course, based on the loss adjuster's assessment on the day.
Physical damage may not always be evident, in either category. If a car has been in flood water, once dried there might not necessarily be any visible damage. But electronically it could be catastrophic, intermittent and long-lasting (and expensive).
Physical damage may not always be evident, in either category. If a car has been in flood water, once dried there might not necessarily be any visible damage. But electronically it could be catastrophic, intermittent and long-lasting (and expensive).
As Cider says, Cat C and Cat D can in reality be exactly same level of damage - crash damage on a 1 year old car will be a certain percentage of value of car and see it classed a D, same damage when car is 10 years old (and of lower value) may well then see it a Cat C - it's ratio of repair to current value, nothing more. Don't use the classifications as a guide to "how bad" the damage was as doesn't work that way - Case by case basis with these, pics of the car when it was damaged is obviously useful as is info of who did the repair work and parts used etc.
BCA said:
Cat D can be pretty light bodywork damage - not usually a concern.
Cat C a little more involved, possible chassis/suspension damage IIRC, - I'd want to have a gooooood look at it, but at that money it is an utter steal.
Cat B is parts only IIRC - must be broken?
Cat A is a must be destroyed jobbie.
,Cat C a little more involved, possible chassis/suspension damage IIRC, - I'd want to have a gooooood look at it, but at that money it is an utter steal.
Cat B is parts only IIRC - must be broken?
Cat A is a must be destroyed jobbie.
i looked at a car for sale that was stolen (with keys) then recovered, after the owner had been payed out
i was told by the dealer these can be C or D depending on how much money the insurance company has lost,
D less than 100% of value
C more than 100% of value
i dont no if this is correct ????
but the car had no damage, is no class for these cars ????
Gassing Station | Cerbera | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff