Example of why Britain is a nation of muppets
Discussion
paddyhasneeds said:
I don't understand why, let alone how, people on relatively modest incomes buy second homes overseas. It just seems so bloody obvious that one bit of trouble and odds are you're in it up to your neck.
Because people cannot see any trouble ahead and they thought that, if any trouble DID arise, they would be able to sell the property and clear the borrowings on it.All of this has come unstuck because the value of the properties have fallen below the outstanding amountts due on the loans.
However, in theory, there is no reason why they couldn't keep making the originally agreed monthly repayments - unless, of course, something has happened in their lives that makes the repayments difficultr or impossible. The article hinted that the loan repayments were now "difficult" but they didn't explain what had happened.
The numbers don't make sense - if their UK house is really worth £300K now they must have borrowed against it pretty recently. How would people of their age (never mind on their likely salaries) have been able to get a £250K mortgage from the Halifax?
And if the sale is forced the Spanish lender will end up with next to nothing from it once the Halifax loan is paid off.
And they've got daughters just going into teenage years - have they no concept of how much that costs!
They probably assumed they could rent out the Spanish property.
And if the sale is forced the Spanish lender will end up with next to nothing from it once the Halifax loan is paid off.
And they've got daughters just going into teenage years - have they no concept of how much that costs!
They probably assumed they could rent out the Spanish property.
Alfa numeric said:
Am I reading this right? They had a mortgage on the Spanish property and rather than foreclose on that the Spanish bank have decided to go for their British home, which wasn't covered under the mortgage? That's quite disturbing.
What that they are dumb? The imbeciles are needlessly in debt up to their eyeballs despite having stable jobs and having had 20 years to pay off a 25 year loan on their home. Overstretching themselves is their fault and I hope the spanish bank win. Alfa numeric said:
Am I reading this right? They had a mortgage on the Spanish property and rather than foreclose on that the Spanish bank have decided to go for their British home, which wasn't covered under the mortgage? That's quite disturbing.
Yep.Because;
1.) Their Spanish propertaay is now worth 2/3rds of feck all and,
2.) They clearly signed contracts without proper legal adivce because:
The article said:
..in Spanish law, a buyer taking out a mortgage gives up the right to contest the debt, and this is taken as evidence of agreeing to the claim.
Why do people do this - enter into agreements without proper advice or understanding of the small print?Alfa numeric said:
Am I reading this right? They had a mortgage on the Spanish property and rather than foreclose on that the Spanish bank have decided to go for their British home, which wasn't covered under the mortgage? That's quite disturbing.
If someone owes you money and has equity in a house, you can take out a charging order against that property and seek an enforcement order to have it sold. That's been English law for a long time and I don't see a problem with it. Debts are to be repaid, not avoided.Zod said:
Willie Dee said:
Example of why PH is a forum of muppets
I wonder whether Willie might identify with the subjects of the Daily Wail article. - Tonkers posting.

However, in his opinion oft stated in such threads, the nasty bank is always in the wrong. These poor deceived people were told lies and tricked into buying the Spanish property by evil developers, aided by the criminal banks.
The main thing Wee Willy wants us to understand is that
IT WAS NOT, NOR EVER IS, THE BUYER'S FAULT. THE BANK IS ALWAYS TO BLAME!
Alfa numeric said:
Am I reading this right? They had a mortgage on the Spanish property and rather than foreclose on that the Spanish bank have decided to go for their British home, which wasn't covered under the mortgage? That's quite disturbing.
I don't understand why you'd think that? You do realise we're all in the EU with sipposedly free movement of goods capital and labour, and with a right to reside in Spain or any other EU country?Also, say if you sold a car to some bloke who bounced the cheque and ran off to Spain, are you seriously telling me you wouldn't pursue him legally once he headed south of Calais?
Think logically about what you wrote for a moment and you see how silly and well, downright "Daily Wail" it sounds...
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



