Real Story on Speed cameras tonight BBC1 19.30
Real Story on Speed cameras tonight BBC1 19.30
Author
Discussion

Tafia

Original Poster:

2,658 posts

270 months

Monday 19th April 2004
quotequote all
Apologies if this has already been posted.

Real Story on BBC1 tonight at 19.30 focuses on the reasons why speed cameras have failed to improve road safety.

Videos on............

KITT

5,345 posts

263 months

Monday 19th April 2004
quotequote all
As this is on the BBC, why can I see this program being just another propaganda episode that will conclude that cameras infact do work? Not sure if I will watch it as these programs tend to get my blood boiling

WildCat

8,369 posts

265 months

Monday 19th April 2004
quotequote all
Probably be re-run of November's effort!

greenv8s

30,998 posts

306 months

Monday 19th April 2004
quotequote all
Probably because all us dangerous criminals are ignoring them, so they need to increase the fines and have more cameras to beat us into submission. Sigh.

hornet

6,333 posts

272 months

Monday 19th April 2004
quotequote all
Tafia said:
Real Story on BBC1 tonight at 19.30 focuses on the reasons why speed cameras have failed to improve road safety.


What odds the answer they come up with is "because there aren't enough of them".

Peter Ward

2,097 posts

278 months

Monday 19th April 2004
quotequote all
Just started.... a good intro, referring to old, poor, and dangerous drivers "that can't be stopped by speed cameras".

Teppic

7,877 posts

279 months

Monday 19th April 2004
quotequote all
Hmm... seems to be slightly less lentilist than the last effort...

Peter Ward

2,097 posts

278 months

Monday 19th April 2004
quotequote all
Points so far:
1) dangerous driving causes >100 serious injuries/day
2) reckless driving, unroadworthy cars, driving under the influence of drink and drugs cause 20% of all road deaths
3) fewer Trafpols to catch dangerous drivers -- in Holland this was directly proportional to increased deaths
4) 1 in 10 drivers are uninsured
5) in Lincs, 104 deaths in 2003 (highest for 10 years)
6) Cutting death toll is "not a Home Office priority", "not core police business"
7) Home Office declined to comment

Peter Ward

2,097 posts

278 months

Monday 19th April 2004
quotequote all
Teenage drivers:
- 1/3 of new drivers have an accident within 2 years
- featured girl "forgot" to wear seatbelt
- one father "need to look at the test again"
- other countries restrict speed/car size/number of passengers for new drivers (where??)
- featured boy driving with his knees while eating (not donuts!)

Old drivers:
- 70-year-old as likely to have an accident as a 17-year-old
- in 10 years there will be more OAP drivers than under 30
- older drivers drive more slowly, more cautiously, hence are a hazard
- examples: wrong way round roundabout and along dual carriageway, poor eyesight
- self-certification of "fit to drive" is a joke.

Overall, a strong message that road safety is down to people's skill and attitude, plus the need for more traffic police to pick up the dangerous drivers. Almost no support for speed cameras, and no mention of the "one third lie". Something of a result, then.

regmolehusband

4,091 posts

279 months

Monday 19th April 2004
quotequote all
Overall very, very good I thought. Some common sense at last. It would have been more complete if they had suggested periodic retests for all and questioned the effect on road safety of prosecuting millions of experienced drivers for minor speed infringments.

"Reg"

bluementhol

111 posts

266 months

Monday 19th April 2004
quotequote all
'Ere, what's he pippin' at' says old boy as he swerves into ouside lane on a dual and then back into the inside. Erm.......you mate!

Tabs

1,068 posts

294 months

Monday 19th April 2004
quotequote all
And if you looked carefully, he was swerving over the Gatso lines as well. Didn't get flashed though!

Peter Ward

2,097 posts

278 months

Monday 19th April 2004
quotequote all
I was shocked at the idea that cutting road deaths is not an HO priority. If this is the case, how can the government keep spouting the speed kills line? It just doesn't add up.

PetrolTed

34,461 posts

325 months

Monday 19th April 2004
quotequote all
Interesting seeing the teenagers in front of their parents. Although they were a bit embarressed about being seen driving without holding the steering wheel, not wearing a seatbelt etc, you could see they didn't really think it was a big deal. Would have been useful to show them the reasons why it's important.

gh0st

4,693 posts

280 months

Monday 19th April 2004
quotequote all
PetrolTed said:
Interesting seeing the teenagers in front of their parents. Although they were a bit embarressed about being seen driving without holding the steering wheel, not wearing a seatbelt etc, you could see they didn't really think it was a big deal. Would have been useful to show them the reasons why it's important.


Maybe in a practical sense....

watkid

3,636 posts

275 months

Monday 19th April 2004
quotequote all
PetrolTed said:
Interesting seeing the teenagers in front of their parents. Although they were a bit embarressed about being seen driving without holding the steering wheel.


But he thought it was OK to drive no handed and using his knees because he was going in a straight line. FFS what if a kiddy had pulled out in front of him or worse, the doddery old bloke in the A35. My dads 77, and stopped driving 8 years ago when he nearly had an accident. His first for 30 years and, it was not his fault. A simular aged person pulled out in front of him. He decided the roads of South Wales were too dangerous after driving in Slough.

deltaf

6,806 posts

275 months

Monday 19th April 2004
quotequote all
Typical kids, young-dum and full of cum.

If the cake eating spazzer didnt understand why its absolutley necessary to have at least one hand on the wheel at all times, then he needs a little re-education, preferably with a size 12 hobnail up his thick arse.

Incidentally, if by some miracle if he's reading this: The reason you need hands on the wheel is to preserve yours and everyone elses lives you muppet.
If thats no big deal to him then he needs removing from the road.
Such dumass stupidity isnt "cool" or clever, its retarded and shows that he's simply not mature enough and has the wrong attitude towards being a driver.

SpudGunner

472 posts

281 months

Monday 19th April 2004
quotequote all
Made me mad when I saw that f***** muppet driving the car the wrong way down a dual carriageway and mowing down that poor bloke and carrying him along on the bonnet.

2 years (1 year if he behaves whilst inside) is bloody ridiculous for that. They should have locked him up and thrown away the key. The guy who got mown down has got the rest of his life to suffer now.

The law is an ass. This country is going downhill rapidly.

deltaf

6,806 posts

275 months

Monday 19th April 2004
quotequote all
SpudGunner said:
Made me mad when I saw that f***** muppet driving the car the wrong way down a dual carriageway and mowing down that poor bloke and carrying him along on the bonnet.

2 years (1 year if he behaves whilst inside) is bloody ridiculous for that. They should have locked him up and thrown away the key. The guy who got mown down has got the rest of his life to suffer now.

The law is an ass. This country is going downhill rapidly.


Absolutley horrendous. Seemed to me that the bastard that did it was intent on hitting others too.
I cant understand the logic of 2 and a bit years for what he's done.
That sentence reflects everything thats wrong in this country.

AJLintern

4,338 posts

285 months

Monday 19th April 2004
quotequote all
Amazes me that there aren't more than 3500 people killed every year after watching that
Removing all these careless idiots, that don't give driving the respect and attention it deserves would improve safety and cut congestion, making the roads a pleasure to drive on - rather than the stressfull tedium it often is these days