free noise reduction software?
free noise reduction software?
Author
Discussion

4Lmike

Original Poster:

1,910 posts

199 months

Tuesday 28th December 2010
quotequote all
can anyone recommend some decent, free noise reduction software. also is there any software out there that is better than photoshop for sharpening? cheers

Gemm

1,833 posts

244 months

SamHH

5,078 posts

245 months

Tuesday 28th December 2010
quotequote all
What software do you have at the moment? Lots of photo editing programs have noise reduction tools, so you might find you already have something suitable.

I doubt there is anything better than Photoshop (the c. £600 one) at sharpening, although lots of other programs can do it well. As with most things though, to get the best results you need to know how to use the various sharpening tools. Also, sharpening can only enhance what you've already got, so depending on what your problem is, the answer might not be in processing. What are you struggling with specifically?

Edited by SamHH on Tuesday 28th December 16:37

jimmy156

3,834 posts

216 months

Tuesday 28th December 2010
quotequote all
Annoyingly the free version of neat image will only apply noise reduction to 1024px X 1024px when used as a plug in in photoshop. But i think should work normally when used as a standalone.

Pupp

12,958 posts

301 months

Wednesday 29th December 2010
quotequote all
Have rcently started using Gimp after some time on PS CS2 and am very pleased with the results so far although it did need a third-party plug in to handle Nikon RAW files. Certainly can't complain at the cost smile

4Lmike

Original Poster:

1,910 posts

199 months

Wednesday 29th December 2010
quotequote all
Cheer Gemm, I'll try those out.

Personally I can't stand Gimp, plus I've got photoshop anyway so was really just looking for a standalone noise reduction software as opposed to a complete image editing program

andy-xr

13,204 posts

233 months

Wednesday 29th December 2010
quotequote all
Check out the Topaz one, installs into PS but best off on a seperate layer. It's slow but fairly precise