100-400mm F/4.5-5.6 L or 300mm F/4 L
100-400mm F/4.5-5.6 L or 300mm F/4 L
Author
Discussion

XG332

Original Poster:

3,927 posts

217 months

Friday 31st December 2010
quotequote all
Looking at hiring a lens to take to the mach loop (for those who don't know, its a hill to stand on with planes flying at you, below and level to)

But which one to take?

100-400mm. Zoom range.
300mm. Faster AF and aperture. Or with canon 1.4 extender (420mm f/5.6)




Edited by XG332 on Friday 31st December 18:12

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

283 months

Friday 31st December 2010
quotequote all
100-400L for sure, its the perfect airshow lens.

And if your shooting props then you dont need fast anyhow unless the light is realy poor.

XG332

Original Poster:

3,927 posts

217 months

Friday 31st December 2010
quotequote all
Well it was fighter jets and it is prone to be bad weather in Wales.

Jezz172

792 posts

208 months

Friday 31st December 2010
quotequote all
Def the 100-400!
It's a hell of a hike up the hills to get a good seat though

XG332

Original Poster:

3,927 posts

217 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
Appart from the zoom range, what else does the 100-400 give me?
Tempted my by the 300 f4 with 1.4 extender.

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

283 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
100-400 will likely be as good in IQ terms as the 300+1.4 and faster focusing.


300f4 gives you better is and weathersealig

XG332

Original Poster:

3,927 posts

217 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
It was the faster focus I would really want. Last couple of times I have taken my cheapo tamron and my biggest problem was that it struggles to focus.
That extra appature will come in handy aswell.

Weather sealing isn't my biggest worry as the camera isn't sealed.