About to take the plunge on a XF 3.0D S
About to take the plunge on a XF 3.0D S
Author
Discussion

matt21

Original Poster:

4,376 posts

230 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
Hi folks, as I am sure you could tell from my posting habits I am a BMW man through and through. Had 4 5-Series covering 200,000 pretty trouble free miles.

I am now about to take the plunge and buy a XF. Been offered a 3.0 D S Premium Luxury on a 60 plate (4 weeks old), 800 miles, first service free, metallic paint, blind spot monitor, ivory leather, indigo blue, 20" wheels and portable audio interface for 38,000 quid.

Does that sound reasonable? And if so what are the weak points on these that could cause issue over the next 100,000 miles (not that it matters too much due to warranty).

Cheers

Matt

zx10ben

1,074 posts

194 months

Friday 7th January 2011
quotequote all
Not bad at all, you didn't mention it, but does it have the parking pack? That is almost a must have as the XF is a big old beast and those front sensors come in very handy!
I'm on my 3rd now and love them!

matt21

Original Poster:

4,376 posts

230 months

Friday 7th January 2011
quotequote all
zx10ben said:
Not bad at all, you didn't mention it, but does it have the parking pack? That is almost a must have as the XF is a big old beast and those front sensors come in very handy!
I'm on my 3rd now and love them!
No parking pack I am afraid, but as part of the deal we have negotiated the fitting of front sensors, but obviously no camera!

Simpo Two

92,002 posts

291 months

Friday 7th January 2011
quotequote all
matt21 said:
No parking pack I am afraid, but as part of the deal we have negotiated the fitting of front sensors, but obviously no camera!
You could tie squeaky toys to the bumpers...

brenflys777

2,680 posts

203 months

Saturday 8th January 2011
quotequote all
Just done the first 2500 miles in mine over the last month and.. its great.

It feels remarkably special inside and also has something the 5 series I traded in lacked - it has character.

I've been a little disappointed with the fuel consumption ( Govt combined 42mpg ) with an average of 35mpg. My previous 520d ( Govt fig 55mpg ) returned an average over 14000 miles of 51mpg, however, in over a month I don't think I've managed to park the Jag without glancing back.

The performance is excellent - this may be linked to the poor economywoohoo

zx10ben

1,074 posts

194 months

Saturday 8th January 2011
quotequote all
brenflys777 said:
Just done the first 2500 miles in mine over the last month and.. its great.

It feels remarkably special inside and also has something the 5 series I traded in lacked - it has character.

I've been a little disappointed with the fuel consumption ( Govt combined 42mpg ) with an average of 35mpg. My previous 520d ( Govt fig 55mpg ) returned an average over 14000 miles of 51mpg, however, in over a month I don't think I've managed to park the Jag without glancing back.

The performance is excellent - this may be linked to the poor economywoohoo
35!!!! eek



Mind you , mine has been remapped and this was after averaging 150mph for 80 miles laugh So yes fuel consumption is directly connected to the fun pedal unfortunately!

Number 5

2,761 posts

221 months

Wednesday 19th January 2011
quotequote all
Are they face lifting the XF?

J500ANT

3,102 posts

265 months

Wednesday 19th January 2011
quotequote all
Number 5 said:
Are they face lifting the XF?
Yes. http://www.carmagazine.co.uk/Secret-new-cars/Searc...

Steven Quas

108 posts

185 months

Thursday 20th January 2011
quotequote all
Matt , I'd like to hear how you find the XF after those BMWs. I am considering an Audi - XF switch.

Steven Quas , Hamburg

mph

2,373 posts

308 months

Thursday 20th January 2011
quotequote all
I changed from an Audi A5 3.0 diesel to an XF 3.0 S diesel portfolio. The Jag was better in almost every respect - except fuel consumption. I doubt you will get anywhere near the official figures whereas the Audi was right on the money.

I test drove BMW 5 series and Merc E class before buying the Jag and in my opinion they weren't in the same league.


a8hex

5,832 posts

249 months

Thursday 20th January 2011
quotequote all
Don't think we've ever been anywhere near the official figures for the mrs' 320CDI MB either.
The 'official' figures have nothing what so ever to do with the real world. They aren't even done on roads.

mph

2,373 posts

308 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
a8hex said:
Don't think we've ever been anywhere near the official figures for the mrs' 320CDI MB either.
The 'official' figures have nothing what so ever to do with the real world. They aren't even done on roads.
I appreciate that, but the Audi and Jag had almost identical official figures.

In the real world and over 10k+ miles the Audi returned 40mpg and the Jag 34mpg.

matt21

Original Poster:

4,376 posts

230 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
Steven Quas said:
Matt , I'd like to hear how you find the XF after those BMWs. I am considering an Audi - XF switch.

Steven Quas , Hamburg
early days, but 500 miles in so far so good and 37mpg! fairly happy as its still being run in but suspect I will never see the 40+mpg average I had from the BMW.

will provide a far more detailed report a few weeks in.

Steven Quas

108 posts

185 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
matt21 said:
early days, but 500 miles in so far so good and 37mpg! fairly happy as its still being run in but suspect I will never see the 40+mpg average I had from the BMW.

will provide a far more detailed report a few weeks in.
Thanks Matt, it's interesting to hear some real world economy figures. Was it a 520d that gave a 40+mpg average, or one of the 3 litre ones (525d,530d,535d)?

Look forward to hearing your more detailed write up when you've had a chance to test it thoroughly.

Steven Quas , Hamburg

Edited by Steven Quas on Friday 21st January 18:59

matt21

Original Poster:

4,376 posts

230 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
Steven Quas said:
matt21 said:
early days, but 500 miles in so far so good and 37mpg! fairly happy as its still being run in but suspect I will never see the 40+mpg average I had from the BMW.

will provide a far more detailed report a few weeks in.
Thanks Matt, it's interesting to hear some real world economy figures. Was it a 520d that gave a 40+mpg average, or one of the 3 litre ones (525d,530d,535d)?

Look forward to hearing your more detailed write up when you've had a chance to test it thoroughly.

Steven Quas , Hamburg

Edited by Steven Quas on Friday 21st January 18:59
It was a manual pre LCI December 2005 530d M Sport. Was really rather good and averaged 40mpg over almost 5 years and 70,000 miles.

If I can average 37mpg out of the Jag with another 50bhp, autobox etc I will be happy!

Steven Quas

108 posts

185 months

Saturday 22nd January 2011
quotequote all
A long term average of 40mpg from a 530d sounds very good.

Out of interest, the current 530d F10 manual is meant to be slightly LESS efficient than the auto, but I have a feeling this may be a quirk of the testing method.

Edited by Steven Quas on Saturday 22 January 11:57

matt21

Original Poster:

4,376 posts

230 months

Sunday 6th February 2011
quotequote all
1500 miles in and still very happy. Doing about 34mpg, not brilliant to be truthful but not bad for what it is with such low miles.

still hoping for a 37mpg average once the engine loosens up a bit...it certainly doesnt feel sluggish though, seriously rapid!

unfortunately it has already been into the workshop having not started monday morning, software or battery fault it would appear. even so, very pleased if it stays reliable going forward.

V41LEY

3,007 posts

264 months

Monday 7th February 2011
quotequote all
zx10ben said:
35!!!! eek



Mind you , mine has been remapped and this was after averaging 150mph for 80 miles laugh So yes fuel consumption is directly connected to the fun pedal unfortunately!
I see SPORT MODE is engaged !!!

zx10ben

1,074 posts

194 months

Monday 7th February 2011
quotequote all
V41LEY said:
I see SPORT MODE is engaged !!!
Ahem...Dynamic my friend, Dynamic.




Can't guarantee it wasn't in Sport mode 5 mins before the picture was taken mind! biggrin

fraserb

132 posts

216 months

Tuesday 8th February 2011
quotequote all
19.4mpg!!!! I get 21 from the XFR!!! mind that's mostly 'on a run'; and not in dynamic!!