ZF Announces 9-speed Gearbox
Nine ratios mark a world-first for gearbox maker with new auto 'box
Transmission maker ZF is working on the world's first 9-speed automatic gearbox for passenger cars.
But unlike the 8-speed ZF auto (which serves in BMWs, Audis and Range Rovers), the 9-speed gearbox is designed for front-drive applications rather than rear- or four-wheel-drive layouts.
"Already a leader in technically advanced, fuel-saving multi-speed transmissions for rear-drive vehicles, ZF's new 9-speed enables significant fuel economy improvements and delivers excellent performance characteristics for front-wheel-drive vehicles," says Hans-Georg Harter, ZF's CEO.
Such is the sophistication of the new gearbox, says ZF, that shifts are 'below the levels of perception'. This means that the gearbox can double-shift or even jump several gears without either the driver or passengers noticing.
ZF also reckons that the 'box's electronic brain selects the right gear for the driving conditions, eliminating unnecessary 'stepping' - or constant shifting.
Which is all very nice, but what's really important, surely, is that drivers of humble front-drive hatches will soon be able to thumb their noses at those Audis, BMWs, Range Rovers and Lexuses that have 'only' eight gears...
The new ZF auto will be built in a brand-new manufacturing facility near Greenville, South Carolina, and word is that the first application of the 9-speed auto will be beneath the bonnet of some sort of Chrysler.
Looked at another way; when my father was posted to the US in 1972 he bought a 1967 Chevy Impala station wagon which had a two speed auto box. It shifted into "top" gear at about 20mph and could then trundle up to about 110mph. If you needed to get a wiggle on I believe it could kick back down to first at anything up to about 50mph. Who could ask for more, eh?
I think the plural is "lexi"
So that's going to be one gear for every 10-15mph increase... why not just use a CVT instead?
So that's going to be one gear for every 10-15mph increase... why not just use a CVT instead?
Rather than have 5 gears and go from 2000rpm - 5000rpm, change, 2000-5000rpm, change, in fact what more gears does for you is keep the car in and around it's most economical zone. For example, 2000-3000, change, 2000-3000, change.
The same can be said for power or torque too. The more gears, the more near (or on) the optiumum engine revs you are - be that for economy, power.
-5 speed manual or 4-speed + overdrive do just fine.
-As for 'beyond any level of perception'... no auto box (except CVT/Multitronic/...) can beat a driver with precise feet operating a manual.
-FWD only makes it completely uninteresting.
This one definitely tops my list of 'irrelevant developments'
Gassing Station | Motoring News | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff





