Lefty Panerai
Author
Discussion

Irish

Original Poster:

3,991 posts

263 months

Saturday 15th January 2011
quotequote all
Calling all Paneristi.

Right, I have been making excuses for years as to why I should not have one of these.

As I wear my Seamaster on my right wrist I have a preference for a lefty.

Questions:

1) How are the Panerai (movements etc.);

2) Are discounts achievable;

3) Supply and demand, economics 1.01, but why are the early 2000 models double the list price;

4) Recommendations for reputable dealers out there?




al1991

4,552 posts

204 months

GC8

19,910 posts

214 months

Saturday 15th January 2011
quotequote all
Over-priced ostentacious tat, trading on a fabricated history; some might argue.

retrorider

1,339 posts

225 months

Saturday 15th January 2011
quotequote all
^^^ What he said...

Irish

Original Poster:

3,991 posts

263 months

Saturday 15th January 2011
quotequote all
Is that Rolex?

Very limited selection from me of Lefty crowns.


......and they have and interesting design.

DH01

820 posts

192 months

Saturday 15th January 2011
quotequote all
GC8 said:
Over-priced ostentacious tat, trading on a fabricated history; some might argue.
+1

deejuic

396 posts

207 months

Saturday 15th January 2011
quotequote all
I love mine. It's a love hate thing. You either love them or hate them. I love them. Don't let anybody tell you that what you like is no good. It's up to you. My Panerai has been extremely durable and looks as sharp as the day I bought it. I use it for diving and casual wear.

It's great. If you like it, get it.

LukeBird

17,170 posts

233 months

Saturday 15th January 2011
quotequote all
NeMiSiS said:
I like Panerai as a watch manufacurer, I don't like all the models though, I particularly like the Luminor range.

They are heaped in history if you can be bothered to read.
There's no doubt Panerai do have history, it's just the current company has nothing to do with the previous one. smile

I'll leave my personal views out of it as they're personal! biggrin

andy_s

19,816 posts

283 months

Saturday 15th January 2011
quotequote all
The clue is in the OPs third question.

Edited by andy_s on Saturday 15th January 18:24

Roofas

219 posts

196 months

Saturday 15th January 2011
quotequote all
eddieo said:
I have one amongst a collection of JLC, Rolex etc. It has a titanium case and appears to be superbly finished. It looks fantastic and whilst the movement may not be anything special the timekeeping seems to be very good. I didn't get Panerai until I got this one and once bought I got it straight away, lovely and definitely a keeper. I recommend having a little peek here: http://www.watchtalkforums.info/forums/panerai-for...
Thanks for that, nice read smile

GC8

19,910 posts

214 months

Saturday 15th January 2011
quotequote all
There are a number of watch producers around who trade on the illusion of an illustrious past. Their provenance ranges from having bought the assets of a long-failed firm, to being a start-up using a name and employing a descendant of the original innovator.....

GC8

19,910 posts

214 months

Saturday 15th January 2011
quotequote all
Speaking of which: are you still building them?

Dr JonboyG

2,561 posts

263 months

Sunday 16th January 2011
quotequote all
Nice timeline, but after Richemont moved the brand to Switzerland and let go all the Florentine craftsmen who actually made the watches, it's a bit rich to claim they're not really a made up brand these days. Would rather have an Anonimo in that case.

Irish

Original Poster:

3,991 posts

263 months

Saturday 9th April 2011
quotequote all
OK, so bought a lefty Panerai. I like the fact they cater for lefties.

So, Omega Seamaster, Ollech & Wajs and now a Panerai Destro.

Next stop Heuer McQueen.


M3John

5,974 posts

243 months

Monday 18th April 2011
quotequote all
Irish said:
OK, so bought a lefty Panerai. I like the fact they cater for lefties.

So, Omega Seamaster, Ollech & Wajs and now a Panerai Destro.

Next stop Heuer McQueen.
Nice one mate. smile