Strictly Point & Shoot Photos
Discussion
I was just talking about this very subject this morning.
I hardly post in the Photography & Video section now as it just seems to be mainly professional photographers, or at least PHer's with a few pennies to waste on very expensive cameras.
It will be nice to see some 'normal' photos that haven't been photo shopped to hell, or given a super long exposure.
[Runs off before people start to shout at me
]
I hardly post in the Photography & Video section now as it just seems to be mainly professional photographers, or at least PHer's with a few pennies to waste on very expensive cameras.
It will be nice to see some 'normal' photos that haven't been photo shopped to hell, or given a super long exposure.
[Runs off before people start to shout at me
] I'm not saying i'm up there with alot of people in this Forum, but I think I take a good pic. I'm by no means rolling in it. I use a canon 1000d and my lenses are the kit lense, a canon 50mm and a tamron 70-300mm, all cheap and widely available second hand. I use a cokin p series holder for the 2 filters i've got. My tripod cost £50. So you could kit yourself out with my set up for around £650. I know its not point and shoot cheap, but it's still accesable.
What i'm trying to say is, you don't need top kit to get results so don't feel put off.
What i'm trying to say is, you don't need top kit to get results so don't feel put off.
It may not be everyone's cup of tea, but this was taken on a camera that cost me £10 (second-hand; I think they're between £25 and £40 -ish new). It's got two apertures, one shutter speed and a plastic lens. It comes with a roll of electrician's tape for sealing up the light leaks.
I don't think that there's any post-processing in there that can't be done in Elements or the Gimp. So, the only expense in getting it on to the computer comes with scanning (and I make use of the scanners at college).

How long is now? by Cap'n Maj Bloodnok, on Flickr
It ain't the kit. It's the eye and the imagination. Rather than invest in ever more expensive kit, spend time looking at the work of great photographers - Cartier-Bresson, Stieglitz, Steichen, Dan Holdsworth, Sally Mann, Diane Arbus, etc, etc, etc. By far the biggest benefit I've gained from doing a college course on contemporary photography has been the introduction to the work of hundreds of great photographers. Some of them I love, some I hate, some I go "meh", but just seeing and absorbing all those styles has done more for my 'eye' than any amount of kit or technical know-how.
I don't think that there's any post-processing in there that can't be done in Elements or the Gimp. So, the only expense in getting it on to the computer comes with scanning (and I make use of the scanners at college).

How long is now? by Cap'n Maj Bloodnok, on Flickr
It ain't the kit. It's the eye and the imagination. Rather than invest in ever more expensive kit, spend time looking at the work of great photographers - Cartier-Bresson, Stieglitz, Steichen, Dan Holdsworth, Sally Mann, Diane Arbus, etc, etc, etc. By far the biggest benefit I've gained from doing a college course on contemporary photography has been the introduction to the work of hundreds of great photographers. Some of them I love, some I hate, some I go "meh", but just seeing and absorbing all those styles has done more for my 'eye' than any amount of kit or technical know-how.
Major Bloodnok said:
My favourite building in my favourite city.I took this with my first digital camera, an Olympus 3Mp compact, in 2004:

OK so I had a cheap version of Photoshop to remove some colour, but apart from that it's a POS photo taken with a camera that's now worth £20.

OK so I had a cheap version of Photoshop to remove some colour, but apart from that it's a POS photo taken with a camera that's now worth £20.
Major Bloodnok said:
It ain't the kit. It's the eye and the imagination.
Yep.Edited by Simpo Two on Sunday 23 January 16:11
Canon Ixus IS 85

010 by NickGrant.co.uk, on Flickr

009 by NickGrant.co.uk, on Flickr

006 by NickGrant.co.uk, on Flickr

001 by NickGrant.co.uk, on Flickr

017 by NickGrant.co.uk, on Flickr
Iphone + Hipstamatic

Untitled by NickGrant.co.uk, on Flickr

Untitled by NickGrant.co.uk, on Flickr

Untitled by NickGrant.co.uk, on Flickr

Untitled by NickGrant.co.uk, on Flickr

Untitled by NickGrant.co.uk, on Flickr

010 by NickGrant.co.uk, on Flickr

009 by NickGrant.co.uk, on Flickr

006 by NickGrant.co.uk, on Flickr

001 by NickGrant.co.uk, on Flickr

017 by NickGrant.co.uk, on Flickr
Iphone + Hipstamatic

Untitled by NickGrant.co.uk, on Flickr

Untitled by NickGrant.co.uk, on Flickr

Untitled by NickGrant.co.uk, on Flickr

Untitled by NickGrant.co.uk, on Flickr

Untitled by NickGrant.co.uk, on Flickr
Penny-lope said:
I was just talking about this very subject this morning.
I hardly post in the Photography & Video section now as it just seems to be mainly professional photographers, or at least PHer's with a few pennies to waste on very expensive cameras.
It will be nice to see some 'normal' photos that haven't been photo shopped to hell, or given a super long exposure.
[Runs off before people start to shout at me
]
I couldn't agree more I hardly post in the Photography & Video section now as it just seems to be mainly professional photographers, or at least PHer's with a few pennies to waste on very expensive cameras.
It will be nice to see some 'normal' photos that haven't been photo shopped to hell, or given a super long exposure.
[Runs off before people start to shout at me
] 
Gassing Station | Photography & Video | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff





























