Discussion
Simpo Two said:
I wonder if a sensor that only records BW might have a higher DR than a colour one?
But then you have to remember that BW is only a chopped up version of colour... hmm...
B&W sensor wouldnt be a chopped up colour one.But then you have to remember that BW is only a chopped up version of colour... hmm...
Colour is created by the bayer filter whch sets 2 green, 1 red one blue pixels via coloured layes.
Remove this and just measure luminosity and you instantly get 2/3rds more light hitting the sensor.
Not sure if you'd get more dynamic range as such though.
I'd guess the body would be £2-3k?
RobDickinson said:
Would you be prepaired to buy one of these?
Full frame 135 35mm B&W sensor, ~20mp, no AA/bayer filter.
Small Rangefinder like body
Full manual or basic meetering only
20/35/50/85 primes only.
Thom seems to think theres a market for them, me too.
I think it would be too niche to be financially viable, full frame sensors don't come cheap and you still have all the cost of the electronics to handle the data capture and file storage. Full frame 135 35mm B&W sensor, ~20mp, no AA/bayer filter.
Small Rangefinder like body
Full manual or basic meetering only
20/35/50/85 primes only.
Thom seems to think theres a market for them, me too.
If you want to try out the concept, then look at a sigma DP1 or DP2. They have a 1.7x crop 4.7mp sensor with no AA filter and the raws can be processed to be true B+W with available freeware since the sensor doesn't use a bayer array. 4.7mp without AA filter is adequate for A3 prints easily.
If sigma decide to put their new 15mp sensor into a DP series camera, you might get almost what you are after.
RobDickinson said:
B&W sensor wouldnt be a chopped up colour one.
Colour is created by the bayer filter whch sets 2 green, 1 red one blue pixels via coloured layes.
Remove this and just measure luminosity and you instantly get 2/3rds more light hitting the sensor.
I suppose what I meant was that you're discarding information (colour information). The filters don't create the colour, they divide the spectrum into chunks.Colour is created by the bayer filter whch sets 2 green, 1 red one blue pixels via coloured layes.
Remove this and just measure luminosity and you instantly get 2/3rds more light hitting the sensor.
So if you take a digital camera and remove the filters it becomes a BW camera?
I got an email from Phase One a few weeks ago about their new black and white digital back. Some information here: http://www.phaseone.com/en/testimonials/acromatic-...
Simpo Two said:
So if you take a digital camera and remove the filters it becomes a BW camera?
That's right. Just get a watchmakers screwdriver between the filter and chip and it should ping off a treat. When you want to put it back, just stick it with a bit of blue tack at each corner. This will add huge versatility to your D200! 
Simpo Two said:
I'll stick to Photoshop!
But at least the Phase One jobbie mentioned above will help keep your tax bill down
Nah, my next back will be full colour thanks. Should still help with the tax bill though.But at least the Phase One jobbie mentioned above will help keep your tax bill down

Thinking about bayer filters, I remember, when I was a lad, when Leaf bought out one of the first quality colour solutions, the DCB1, using a B&W sensor and front-of-lens motorised filter wheel for the colour exposures. It wasn't very good for fashion! It came out in 93 and reading about the requirements of the day, makes you realise how far the tech has come. You needed a whopping 64mbs of RAM (costing another whooping £1800!), to run it. At £25k, the back certainly would have made a dent in your tax bill! For those interested, you can read about it here: http://www.epi-centre.com/reports/9304cs.html
Simpo Two said:
Next thing they'll be arranging organic micro-sensors into a grain structure 
That's so old hat! They were doing that, back in 1903 with the Autochrome process... using potato starch... to great effect too! 

Edited by Bacardi on Sunday 30th January 18:11
I suppose it would heavily depend on the price. A quarter of the M9's (UK street) price is £1250, not £2000—3000. Would putting a black and white sensor in the M9 lop £3750 off the price though?
I'm more interested in the mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras from the mass-market manufacturers; looking forward to seeing what Canon's and Nikon's mirrorless cameras are going to be like.
I'm more interested in the mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras from the mass-market manufacturers; looking forward to seeing what Canon's and Nikon's mirrorless cameras are going to be like.
Cabinet Enforcer said:
If you want to try out the concept, then look at a sigma DP1 or DP2. They have a 1.7x crop 4.7mp sensor with no AA filter and the raws can be processed to be true B+W with available freeware since the sensor doesn't use a bayer array. 4.7mp without AA filter is adequate for A3 prints easily.
Still a crop sensor and fixed lens, and a slow lens.Sensor would be cheap for a FF sensor (less filters) but still pricey, body would be cheap to make.
Hm it may be more palatable as a colour sensor I guess, that will cut down on low light abilities etc tho.
Edited by RobDickinson on Sunday 30th January 21:13
Sounds like an Epson R-D1 apart from the cropped sensor. I don't mind that, though - I use the same 28mm lens I use on my Leica and it's great on the Epson.
I heard Fuji may develop an interchangeable lens version of the X100 but who knows. It's more 'digital' in feel than I would like; the R-D1 is just lovely to handle and use.
I heard Fuji may develop an interchangeable lens version of the X100 but who knows. It's more 'digital' in feel than I would like; the R-D1 is just lovely to handle and use.
Gassing Station | Photography & Video | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



