What's up with Hybrid Diesels?
What's up with Hybrid Diesels?
Author
Discussion

itz_baseline

Original Poster:

825 posts

237 months

Monday 7th February 2011
quotequote all
I've been wondering why all hybrids these days seem to be petrol engines? Most of the petrol hybrids out there only offering around 65mpg at tops, which is no more (if not worse) than what a little Polo Diesel can offer. I know Peugeot are creating the worlds first Diesel Hybrid later this year (or maybe early next year).....but this still only seems to be offering 65mpg.

The only purpose of a hybrid in my mind is to have a hyper-miler type car.....otherwise it seems pointless. So why aren't manufacturers working on making a hybrid out of a small, light diesel car which already does 70+ mpg before they start? With a bit of hybrid magic, surely 100mpg is possible?

Is the technology just not worth it in monetary terms.....or is there some government conspiracy going on where they are telling manufactures to reduce emissions, but not MPG to keep people buying lots of petrol, generating lots of tax wink


Kozy

3,169 posts

234 months

Monday 7th February 2011
quotequote all
Because they have to keep something up their sleeve for the next round of fire from the Euro emissions freaks?

HellDiver

5,708 posts

198 months

Monday 7th February 2011
quotequote all
Modern diesels are too complicated, too unreliable, and too expensive. Applies to hybrids, and non-hybrids. Small petrol engines are simpler, more reliable, quieter, and don't have dodgy emission controls that make them eat their own st.

Bluebarge

4,519 posts

194 months

Monday 7th February 2011
quotequote all
Higher cost of the diesel engine vs efficiency savings achieved, plus lack of refinement compared with petrol hybrids. Diesel hybrids are being worked on, but greatest focus is on making them work for trucks and other large vehicles.

fareaster

234 posts

195 months

Monday 7th February 2011
quotequote all
I´ve read it´s a cost thing, Hydrids are more expensive than conventional petrols, diesels are more expensive than conventional petrols, put the two together and it gets really expensive. Having said that I think there are a few about http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-11452568
Another factor is that this is a Japanese developed technology and the Japanese buying public don´t like diesels in cars.

Petrolhead_Rich

4,659 posts

208 months

Monday 7th February 2011
quotequote all
Weight of diesel engine, rattly start stop, engine gunging up (Diesels need a good run to glear them out, short on off and it's fooked in 6 months), energy used in starting (glow plugs, higher load on starter) etc etc

Ed.

2,175 posts

254 months

Monday 7th February 2011
quotequote all
Originally Japan the maker and America the major customer didn't like diesel. Also its easier to absorb the hybrid costs in a larger luxury car than a cheaper small one.

briers

873 posts

195 months

Monday 7th February 2011
quotequote all
HellDiver said:
Modern diesels are too complicated, too unreliable, and too expensive. Applies to hybrids, and non-hybrids. Small petrol engines are simpler, more reliable, quieter, and don't have dodgy emission controls that make them eat their own st.
Pistonheads should start banning people who make posts as wrong as this

You clearly have no idea what manufacturers are putting into modern petrol engined cars do you.



Monty Python

4,813 posts

213 months

Monday 7th February 2011
quotequote all
Hybrids are there to make tree-huggers feel as if they're doing their bit to "save the planet", hence their popularity with film stars. What they don't consider is the environmental impact of mining and processing the metals required for the batteries. They're a bit lit wind turbines - they look good but don't really deliver. At the end of the day, a small diesel is better.

So far, the only new technology that makes sense is the one Jaguar put in the C-X75 - using turbines that can run on any sort of fuel to generate electricity to either recharge the batteries or feed electricity direct to the motors means it behaves like a normal car in terms of refuelling, but has the benefit that you can plug it in at night.

Mr Gear

9,416 posts

206 months

Monday 7th February 2011
quotequote all
Ed. said:
Originally Japan the maker and America the major customer didn't like diesel. Also its easier to absorb the hybrid costs in a larger luxury car than a cheaper small one.
^ This.

The only people that use diesel in family cars are Europeans.

Mr Gear

9,416 posts

206 months

Monday 7th February 2011
quotequote all
Monty Python said:
Hybrids are there to make tree-huggers feel as if they're doing their bit to "save the planet", hence their popularity with film stars. What they don't consider is the environmental impact of mining and processing the metals required for the batteries. They're a bit lit wind turbines - they look good but don't really deliver. At the end of the day, a small diesel is better.

So far, the only new technology that makes sense is the one Jaguar put in the C-X75 - using turbines that can run on any sort of fuel to generate electricity to either recharge the batteries or feed electricity direct to the motors means it behaves like a normal car in terms of refuelling, but has the benefit that you can plug it in at night.
And how exactly is the "environmental impact of mining and processing the metals required for the batteries" any different for the C-X75 compared to any other hybrid? Apart from the fact you have to have a bigger battery requiring more raw materials?

I wish people would think before posting.

HellDiver

5,708 posts

198 months

Monday 7th February 2011
quotequote all
briers said:
Pistonheads should start banning people who make posts as wrong as this

You clearly have no idea what manufacturers are putting into modern petrol engined cars do you.
I've a very good idea what they're putting in, thanks.

I don't see a diesel particulate filters on petrol cars, I don't see any gummed up inlet manifolds either. I don't see petrol cars needing new injectors, EGRs replaced every 40k. I don't see petrol cars needing DPF fluid filled at 35k, or new DPF fluid bladders costing more to replace than the car is worth.

So, what do YOU think happens to a modern diesel?

The Wookie

14,164 posts

244 months

Monday 7th February 2011
quotequote all
Mr Gear said:
And how exactly is the "environmental impact of mining and processing the metals required for the batteries" any different for the C-X75 compared to any other hybrid?
Because he likes it as it's got two jet engines and that's cool

edo

16,699 posts

281 months

Monday 7th February 2011
quotequote all
HellDiver said:
Modern diesels are too complicated, too unreliable, and too expensive. Applies to hybrids, and non-hybrids. Small petrol engines are simpler, more reliable, quieter, and don't have dodgy emission controls that make them eat their own st.
dear oh dear.

On another note the main reason I would guess must surely be that most of these Hybrids go over the pond for celebs top buy to go to film premiers in, and the US dont get Derv to the same degree as Europe?

RobCrezz

7,892 posts

224 months

Monday 7th February 2011
quotequote all
briers said:
Pistonheads should start banning people who make posts as wrong as this

You clearly have no idea what manufacturers are putting into modern petrol engined cars do you.
So please explain?

I know petrol engines are getting more complex, but not as much as diesels. i.e Diesels have far higher fuel pressures and fancy injectors. Turbos on diesels generally have to cope with producing much higher boost pressures.

Bonefish Blues

32,421 posts

239 months

Monday 7th February 2011
quotequote all
Slightly O/T but relevant to the debate:

I was told by a usually reliable source that diesel engines are pretty much technically maxed out v-a-v economy and emissions whereas petrol engines have significant development potential still.

Is this the case?

heebeegeetee

29,499 posts

264 months

Monday 7th February 2011
quotequote all
HellDiver said:
briers said:
Pistonheads should start banning people who make posts as wrong as this

You clearly have no idea what manufacturers are putting into modern petrol engined cars do you.
I've a very good idea what they're putting in, thanks.

I don't see a diesel particulate filters on petrol cars, I don't see any gummed up inlet manifolds either. I don't see petrol cars needing new injectors, EGRs replaced every 40k. I don't see petrol cars needing DPF fluid filled at 35k, or new DPF fluid bladders costing more to replace than the car is worth.

So, what do YOU think happens to a modern diesel?
Talking of small petrol engines, i'm now in the business of rebuilding engines on Smart cars, which suffer from gummed oil control rings, leading to burning oil in the combustion chamber and burning exhaust valves. It requires a full rebuild to replace valves and rings and honing of the cylinders.

Some of these engines are shagged before 50k miles.

Anyway, VW doesn't think there's anything wrong with a diesel hybrid smile. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/car-manufactur...

HellDiver

5,708 posts

198 months

Monday 7th February 2011
quotequote all
heebeegeetee said:
Some of these engines are shagged before 50k miles.
That's because morons who buy them use them like a real car. When I was doing my long commute I used to pass a guy in a Smart who was doing the same commute as I was. 50 miles of motorway each day isn't the right journey to be using a Smart.

Mr Gear

9,416 posts

206 months

Monday 7th February 2011
quotequote all
edo said:
dear oh dear.

On another note the main reason I would guess must surely be that most of these Hybrids go over the pond for celebs top buy to go to film premiers in, and the US dont get Derv to the same degree as Europe?
What is all this "celebrity" bullst? There is a Prius outside my office that has just disgorged a mother and her two children onto the pavement to take them to school. This is what 99.99% of hybrids are used for... the same thing as any other car, by exactly the same type of people. Just because Leonardo De Caprio also has one, it doesn't in any way create a stereotype, and if you believe it does, you must be in some sort of a dreamworld.


nouze

853 posts

193 months

Monday 7th February 2011
quotequote all
Perhaps its because diesel engines are heavier