MG ZT good value or not?

MG ZT good value or not?

Author
Discussion

TonyRPH

Original Poster:

13,022 posts

170 months

Thursday 10th February 2011
quotequote all
I've seen quite a few advertised for around the £2k mark.

+- 60k miles, 160bhp

Absolute bargain for £2k or not?

Or are most of them sheds?

kambites

67,699 posts

223 months

Thursday 10th February 2011
quotequote all
I'd be wary of the 1.8 K-series in anything that heavy, personally. The V6s and V8 are a lot of car for the money, though.

TonyRPH

Original Poster:

13,022 posts

170 months

Thursday 10th February 2011
quotequote all
The 2.5 is a V6 isn't it?

That's what I'm looking at.


Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

248 months

Thursday 10th February 2011
quotequote all
As with all cheap cars it's good value - until it goes wrong!

The question is whether the cars are cheap because,
a) foolish car buyers don't appreciate the wonders of the vehicle, or
b) smart car buyers have the sense to stay away?

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

192 months

Thursday 10th February 2011
quotequote all
Ozzie Osmond said:
As with all cheap cars it's good value - until it goes wrong!

The question is whether the cars are cheap because,
a) foolish car buyers don't appreciate the wonders of the vehicle, or
b) smart car buyers have the sense to stay away?
It's always a). Not sure their are any b)'s or if they even exist at all.

Chris71

21,536 posts

244 months

Thursday 10th February 2011
quotequote all
They're fairly old-tech FWD saloons. Accept that they're not M3 chasers and you should get a good car for the money, particularly now any non-enthusiasts with £2k cars are probably starting to think twice about the V6 running costs.

kambites

67,699 posts

223 months

Thursday 10th February 2011
quotequote all
TonyRPH said:
The 2.5 is a V6 isn't it?

That's what I'm looking at.
The 160 is a turbocharged 1.8 I4 K-series. The 180 and 190 are KV6s.

MG511

1,754 posts

243 months

Thursday 10th February 2011
quotequote all
kambites said:
The 160 is a turbocharged 1.8 I4 K-series. The 180 and 190 are KV6s.
160 can be a V6 or 1.8 turbo. 180 is an auto, 190 is manual V6.

confused_buyer

6,661 posts

183 months

Thursday 10th February 2011
quotequote all
Early 160's were 2.5 V6. They're usually pretty cheap.

They're good cars are the ZT as long as you find a well looked after one. Cluches give trouble as do thermostat housings on the V6's and the variable intake system.

On the whole, however, they are as well built as most and better built than many so it is the usual used car checks.

aruck

829 posts

241 months

Thursday 10th February 2011
quotequote all
Be aware that at 90k they need a cambelt change which I seem to recall is circa £700. Something do with having to take engine out. Going from memory here so could be wrong on the reasoning. I had a 2.5 V6 ZS some years ago. Was a good car. Interior left quite a lot to be desired though!

Z28fan

148 posts

172 months

Thursday 10th February 2011
quotequote all
The cam-belt needs doing at 7 years or 60k (IIRC) price-wise if you get it serviced at the same time about £550 will see you in there (I did this in Sept)... they grip well and have a revvy engine, interior is nice enough but nothing ultra special (loved the oval dials though, nice touch). So all in all fking awesome value... BUT (there's always one isn't there!!) if you're going to do long distances just make sure that the revvy engine doesn't piss you off - @ 85/90 it was doing c.4,000 rpm which really did my head in

kambites

67,699 posts

223 months

Thursday 10th February 2011
quotequote all
MG511 said:
160 can be a V6 or 1.8 turbo. 180 is an auto, 190 is manual V6.
Ah OK, never realised they did a 160 V6.