Car brands with true identity
Car brands with true identity
Author
Discussion

KenBlocksPants

Original Poster:

6,990 posts

200 months

Friday 18th February 2011
quotequote all
Following a comment in the Ferrari 4x4 thread about brands loosing their identity, I wondered about what brands remained true to their historical message and heritage?

Some of the worst to loose themselves recently would be BMW (Front wheel drives and 4x4 cross over coupes?, Peugeot (The drive of your life?), Land Rover (Chrome bling mobiles?)

So who is still there flying their flags?

Lotus?
Jaguar?

Possibly the only ones I can think of.



kambites

69,803 posts

237 months

Friday 18th February 2011
quotequote all
Lotus perhaps used to, but under the new management it doesn't seem likely to continue.

I guess Mercedes are still predominantly aimed at the luxury car market, even if they do produce funny little hatchbacks as well.

marshalla

15,902 posts

217 months

Friday 18th February 2011
quotequote all
Caterham
Lamborghini
Zonda
Koenigsegg
Ford

R11ysf

1,956 posts

198 months

Friday 18th February 2011
quotequote all
There are one or two, but it the changing market for cars they haven't succeeded, e.g. TVR.

I suppose Caterham still are what they set out to be but all of those are not volume manufacturers with share holders etc.

E55 Max

1,181 posts

188 months

Friday 18th February 2011
quotequote all
kambites said:
Lotus perhaps used to, but under the new management it doesn't seem likely to continue.

I guess Mercedes are still predominantly aimed at the luxury car market, even if they do produce funny little hatchbacks as well.
CLC Has now been discontinuedbiggrin

Alfa numeric

3,133 posts

195 months

Friday 18th February 2011
quotequote all
SAAB and Lamborghini are the names that sprang to mind for me. It appears that genuinely quirky brands are slowly moving into the mainstream as sales get squeezed though, and that's a shame.

Of course it could be argued that Toyota is staying true to its original philosophy by producing the bland Auris and Avensis!

ewenm

28,506 posts

261 months

Friday 18th February 2011
quotequote all
Lotus - I guess it depends if you think Lotus = lightweight cars or Lotus = excellent handling, responsive sports cars. If the first then the new cars due in 2015 will disappoint. If the second then they're remaining true to that. Chapman always wanted to take the firm upmarket, so they are remaining true to that.

Caterham wink Can't see them selling out with a 4x4/MPV hehe

LuS1fer

42,681 posts

261 months

Friday 18th February 2011
quotequote all
The Corvette has remained true to its roots and arguably Chevrolet given thaey have always been about providing the family man with cheap transport - it just happens that straight sixes and V8s were the way to go at the time.

Porsche to half an extent in that they still make cars with engines predoninantly towards the rear.

E30M3SE

8,480 posts

212 months

Friday 18th February 2011
quotequote all
Which current BMW is FWD?

mat205125

17,790 posts

229 months

Friday 18th February 2011
quotequote all
E55 Max said:
kambites said:
Lotus perhaps used to, but under the new management it doesn't seem likely to continue.

I guess Mercedes are still predominantly aimed at the luxury car market, even if they do produce funny little hatchbacks as well.
CLC Has now been discontinuedbiggrin
They still make vans though ..... Can't imagine Adolf making quite the same entrance to Nuremburg on the back of a Sprinter flatbed, can you?

kambites

69,803 posts

237 months

Friday 18th February 2011
quotequote all
mat205125 said:
They still make vans though ..... Can't imagine Adolf making quite the same entrance to Nuremburg on the back of a Sprinter flatbed, can you?
Isn't the commercial vehicle manufacturer essentially run as a separate company? I guess they are the same brand, though.

Hugo a Gogo

23,416 posts

249 months

Friday 18th February 2011
quotequote all
mat205125 said:
E55 Max said:
kambites said:
Lotus perhaps used to, but under the new management it doesn't seem likely to continue.

I guess Mercedes are still predominantly aimed at the luxury car market, even if they do produce funny little hatchbacks as well.
CLC Has now been discontinuedbiggrin
They still make vans though ..... Can't imagine Adolf making quite the same entrance to Nuremburg on the back of a Sprinter flatbed, can you?
Mercedes have done vans and trucks for quite a while


E30M3SE

8,480 posts

212 months

Friday 18th February 2011
quotequote all
doogz said:
None.

But the next 1er will be. Or, at least, some of them will be.
Let's wait see if that actually happens, as what I have read is that,

" The 1er will remain a rear-wheel drive vehicle and shares the same L7 architecture as the next 3 series. At the same time, the L7 has the flexible firewall location geometry that will allow it to accommodate FWD, RWD, or AWD models."

Diabolik

1,222 posts

177 months

Friday 18th February 2011
quotequote all
Lexus?

Twincam16

27,647 posts

274 months

Friday 18th February 2011
quotequote all
Alfa Romeo still stick to the philosophy they established in the early '50s when they realised they couldn't afford to be the Italian Bentley any more. OK, so it's not what they were founded back in 1910 to do, but as far as sticking to your design brief - family cars penned by design houses, practical but fun to drive - they've always maintained it with the exception of the Arna (which it could be argued isn't even an Alfa, but a Nissan with an Alfa engine).

Jaguar - Grace, Pace & Space. Even the X-Type did this, and there's never been a truly ugly Jaguar - even the XJS was massaged into a looker by the early '90s.

Aston Martin - possibly. Again, like Alfa Romeo they had a change of direction after the war. Prior to the '40s they made MG rivals. It was the purchase of Lagonda that took them upmarket but I can't think of an Aston Martin that hasn't deviated from the 'sporting GTs of the highest quality' recipe since. That said, their thoroughbred nature has taken a bit of a kicking with the engines in the DB7 and AMV8.

anonymous-user

70 months

Friday 18th February 2011
quotequote all
KenBlocksPants said:
Jaguar?

Possibly the only ones I can think of.
Where does the x-type diesel estate fit into their brand heritage!

Brilad

598 posts

205 months

Friday 18th February 2011
quotequote all
Hmmm.

I can just imagine Adolf making his appearance on the back of a Sprinter.

No slow/stately/dignified entrance for him: it would be Der Fuhrer hammering round the arena on the back of the Merc at maximum velocity, being bounced unceremoniously around, whilst tailgaiting Goebells' state car, flashing it's lights and jabbing the brakes as if the driver is having an epileptic seizure.

kambites

69,803 posts

237 months

Friday 18th February 2011
quotequote all
E30M3SE said:
Let's wait see if that actually happens, as what I have read is that,

" The 1er will remain a rear-wheel drive vehicle and shares the same L7 architecture as the next 3 series. At the same time, the L7 has the flexible firewall location geometry that will allow it to accommodate FWD, RWD, or AWD models."
As I understand it, BMW have already announced that some of the next generation 1-series will be FWD. Specifically the estate version will be FWD only, the hatch will be available as both, and the coupe and cab will be RWD only.

Does seem odd if true, though. I would have thought producing hatchbacks as both would be prohibitively expensive.

anonymous-user

70 months

Friday 18th February 2011
quotequote all
Possibly Subaru, boxer engines, permanent 4wd, a small range of well built but slightly bland looking cars with a cult following?

Twincam16

27,647 posts

274 months

Friday 18th February 2011
quotequote all
yellowbentines said:
KenBlocksPants said:
Jaguar?

Possibly the only ones I can think of.
Where does the x-type diesel estate fit into their brand heritage!
It's graceful, not completely sluggish and has a lot of space in it.

OK, so it's not really, really fast, but neither was this, and I don't think anyone would disagree that it wasn't a 'real Jaguar':