Another what car. £2.5k, fast, fun and reliable.
Another what car. £2.5k, fast, fun and reliable.
Author
Discussion

Easty-5

Original Poster:

1,423 posts

206 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
Looking for some idea's, experiences etc.

I am in the market for a new car. Budget of approx 2.5k but could be pushed to 3k for something really good. I am selling my MR2 Rev 3 Turbo next week so this is what I am coming from. I would like something quick and fun to drive. Doesn't have to practical but I would like it to be reliable and not cost a fortune to run. I am 21 so insurance also plays a part.

At the minute I am swaying towards the PH favourite MX5. Although it's not quick I am sure it would be great fun to drive and cheap to run. I am looking at a turbo'd one too which I am sure would be quicker but unsure on the reliability?

What else is worth considering in my budget?

chunkymonkey71

13,122 posts

214 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
How about something non turbo?

Some kind of BMW?

Chris71

21,548 posts

258 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
Some sort of MR2? The mk2s are plentiful, reliable and can be made to handle very well, despite what some people claim.

SteveS Cup

1,996 posts

176 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
I'd sugeest a Clio 172.

Easty-5

Original Poster:

1,423 posts

206 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
Chris71 said:
Some sort of MR2? The mk2s are plentiful, reliable and can be made to handle very well, despite what some people claim.
Indeed. I am coming from a MK2 rev 3 turbo. It's being sold next week, just fancy a change.

joe_90

4,206 posts

247 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
Clio 172 ph1
done.. you will NOT get a better car for the money in terms of fun, handling,and mpg.. And they are quite reliable too..

Dift

1,645 posts

243 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
There is a nice turbo Mk1 MX5 in the classifieds thats back up for sale. Looks a beautiful, and I guess the only reason it hasnt sold yet is because its up in Scotland...

Worth a look!

robsco

7,875 posts

192 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
Fiat Coupe?

Chris71

21,548 posts

258 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
Easty-5 said:
Chris71 said:
Some sort of MR2? The mk2s are plentiful, reliable and can be made to handle very well, despite what some people claim.
Indeed. I am coming from a MK2 rev 3 turbo. It's being sold next week, just fancy a change.
Ah. That's that box ticked then!

I'd imagine most other cars in the price range will feel a little pedestrian after an MR2 turbo.

What about something a bit more retro - 205 GTi? E30 BMW? M535i? Okay, not as reliable as something newer and Japanese perhaps, but a good one needn't be bad.

nottyash

4,671 posts

211 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
You will be pushed for a car to match the pace of your MR2 rev 3 turbo. I had one, pretty good cars.
Try something like a Honda Prelude 2.2 VTI or Mitsubishi FTO GPX Mivec, only go for manual, both are cheap to buy. A UK Prelude is a cheaper insurance option, and the 4 wheel steering is great. If you go down the Prelude route go for a UK red top engined one (1999/2000 cars) as they were lower geared/ 200bhp. I have had 4, and my Wife has claimed the latest one off mefrown




Edited by nottyash on Thursday 24th February 17:24

sparks_E39

12,738 posts

229 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
E36 328i Coupe £2500 should get you a great late example.

TomS09

194 posts

204 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
I picked up an Accord type-r for a shade over your budget, fulfils all your criteria I'd say wink

Mr MXT

7,757 posts

299 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
nottyash said:
Mitsubishi FTO GPX Mivec, only go for manual,
Don't do this IMO!

I went from an MR2T to a that spec FTO. It was slow and disproportionately expensive to insure. Good shout on the MX5 Turbo. I've currently got one and can't see me ever getting rid of it.

Chris71

21,548 posts

258 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
TomS09 said:
I picked up an Accord type-r for a shade over your budget, fulfils all your criteria I'd say wink
Out of interest, how do you reckon the Accord would compare to the Type R variants of the Civic and Integra?

Easty-5

Original Poster:

1,423 posts

206 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
Mr MXT said:
Don't do this IMO!

I went from an MR2T to a that spec FTO. It was slow and disproportionately expensive to insure. Good shout on the MX5 Turbo. I've currently got one and can't see me ever getting rid of it.
How does it compare to the MR2T? I imagine it's not as quick in a straight line, but a hell of a lot more fun to drive? Probably quicker along the B-roads? How reliable has it been?

I love the straight line speed of my MR2 but I just have very little condidence in it on the corners. It just doesn't feel throwable and the steering is somewhat very unresponsive and numb feeling.

Dift

1,645 posts

243 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all

Mr MXT

7,757 posts

299 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
Easty-5 said:
How does it compare to the MR2T? I imagine it's not as quick in a straight line, but a hell of a lot more fun to drive? Probably quicker along the B-roads? How reliable has it been?

I love the straight line speed of my MR2 but I just have very little condidence in it on the corners. It just doesn't feel throwable and the steering is somewhat very unresponsive and numb feeling.
Compared to a rev 2 MRT @ about 220bhp. The '5 is running 205bhp. Bear in mind the MRT was a good few years ago (Bloody hell 7 years ago!). If i remember straight line the 5 is probably pretty similar, maybe a bit quicker. Mines 6 speed so its shorter geared. Its about on par with my friends E46 M3 Cab. (Heavy!)

I'm not sure if it would be quicker than the MRT cross country, but its a hell of a lot more fun to hustle and much more exploitable. Touch wood, mine has been pretty reliable apart from a few minor issues like a coolant hose splitting.

Jayho

2,358 posts

186 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
:O how you're insuring a MR2 Turbo at 21 YO is amazing to me...

How about a SEAT Leon Cupra 1.8T? You can pick up a 2000-2003 one for that price, with much life still left in it. Very modifiable aswell.

nonuts

15,855 posts

245 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
Mr MXT said:
nottyash said:
Mitsubishi FTO GPX Mivec, only go for manual,
Don't do this IMO!

I went from an MR2T to a that spec FTO. It was slow and disproportionately expensive to insure. Good shout on the MX5 Turbo. I've currently got one and can't see me ever getting rid of it.
They also rot, badly if not looked after very carefully and undersealed.

TomS09

194 posts

204 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
Chris71 said:
Out of interest, how do you reckon the Accord would compare to the Type R variants of the Civic and Integra?
I've not driven either of those but performance wise there is not much in it, a good driver in one would be quicker than the others etc, plus the Accord has LSD which is a big help. I think the accord may be better for everyday driving in some respects due to more torque and comfier interior. I was looking at the other Type-Rs, but found the accord alot cheaper to insure at my age at the time (21), plus it was cheaper to buy as well.