RR Evoque & visibility - when did car designers stop caring?
RR Evoque & visibility - when did car designers stop caring?
Author
Discussion

havoc

Original Poster:

31,942 posts

251 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
Saw my first un-disguised RR Evoque this morning on the A46. Not a bad looking car, in all honesty - rear looks a little heavy but side is fine and front-end looks good.

BUT - the rear window is a f'n letterbox which starts ~6ft off the ground. The only thing you're going to see in that is white-van man giving you the finger and maybe someone's hat flying up after you've reversed over them.

The 370Z is another case in point - rear-quarter vision is non-existent and the rear-window is shallow and heavily tinted. I can only assume that the designers figure that you're not worried about what's behind you as you'll always be driving so quickly Then you've the CR-Z which is almost as bad, except there's not even the speed excuse. And let's not start on all these "CC" monstrosities...



So what the f*** has happened? Even modern hatchbacks have blind-spots you could hide a small pachyderm in.

LHD

17,002 posts

203 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
You can see out of the Evoque quite well actually. wink

Plus you'll be able to get a reversing camera...

Negative Creep

25,568 posts

243 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
Most modern cars have atrocious visibility - but hey they've got a 5 star ncap rating so who cares about trivial matters like that? rolleyes

kambites

69,865 posts

237 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
Negative Creep said:
Most modern cars have atrocious visibility - but hey they've got a 5 star ncap rating so who cares about trivial matters like that? rolleyes
yes Visibility is pretty much inversely proportional to crash safety. Guess which wins the most buyers. frown

LD1Racing

7,421 posts

234 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
Couldn't see anything out of the back of my Exige.

Seriously though, the OH's Fiat 500 is terrible also, but active safety overtook passive* safety somewhere along the line. Had a '70's Range Rover a while back and the visibility was amazing.

  • may have passive and active the wrong way around - due to medicinal single malts tonight.

havoc

Original Poster:

31,942 posts

251 months

Friday 25th February 2011
quotequote all
LHD said:
Plus you'll be able to get a reversing camera...
Bet it's a cost-option though! Windows TEND to come as standard on cars... wink

Deerfoot

5,073 posts

200 months

Friday 25th February 2011
quotequote all
havoc said:
Bet it's an expensive cost-option though! Windows TEND to come as standard on cars... wink
EFA.

Tuvra

7,926 posts

241 months

Friday 25th February 2011
quotequote all
I sat in and walked away from an X6 due to the rear window size:

I mentioned it to the sales man who admitted "theres no defence for that really, its just one of those mad ideas the designers think looks good"

braddo

11,859 posts

204 months

Friday 25th February 2011
quotequote all
Negative Creep said:
Most modern cars have atrocious visibility - but hey they've got a 5 star ncap rating so who cares about trivial matters like that? rolleyes
It's interesting that until maybe 5-10 years ago, outward visibility was a big issue that the motoring mags liked to harp on about. It's an issue that seems to have been forgotten in the pursuit of NCAP ratings and cupholders.

It's a reason why older cars can make surprisingly good daily drivers in town - much better visibility, narrower than most modern cars, taller sidewalls for decent ride comfort etc.

LuS1fer

42,692 posts

261 months

Friday 25th February 2011
quotequote all
I hate modern cars you can't see out of. The Mondeo already has more scuffs than the 15 year old Golf which is like an aquarium in comparison.

durbster

11,393 posts

238 months

Friday 25th February 2011
quotequote all
Paddy_N_Murphy said:
I was givn a Corsa as a rental the other week. Shocking rear quarters line of sight !
My MX5 with the hood up is better !
But you'll be perfectly safe when you inevitably do crash into something biggrin

Maybe it's another angle for marketing -

The New Vauxhall Corsa - Same visibility as a Lamborghini Gallardo!

AyBee

10,911 posts

218 months

Friday 25th February 2011
quotequote all
The BMW X6 is bad for this too - I stood behind one and asked a colleague, who was in the driving seat, how much of me he could see, the answer was chest up - I'm 5'9"...

havoc

Original Poster:

31,942 posts

251 months

Friday 25th February 2011
quotequote all
braddo said:
It's interesting that until maybe 5-10 years ago, outward visibility was a big issue that the motoring mags liked to harp on about. It's an issue that seems to have been forgotten in the pursuit of NCAP ratings and cupholders.

It's a reason why older cars can make surprisingly good daily drivers in town - much better visibility, narrower than most modern cars, taller sidewalls for decent ride comfort etc.
Agreed. Find my ITR easier to place than the wife's MkV Golf, despite it being longer and with a lower-slung driving position. The A4s and Insignias at work are bloody awful...no idea where the front of the car is at all...

Chicane-UK

3,861 posts

201 months

Friday 25th February 2011
quotequote all
Driven a few new Scirocco's now and still get angry thinking about the letterbox rear window and tree-trunk width A pillars which completely obscure your view as you approach roundabouts.

Old cars may be less safe but at least you can see out of them! wink