3.5 Ton Horseboxes - Van chassis cab questions etc
3.5 Ton Horseboxes - Van chassis cab questions etc
Author
Discussion

cptsideways

Original Poster:

13,884 posts

282 months

Saturday 26th February 2011
quotequote all
I'm currently beavering away searching for a replacement Horsebox for the Mr's, needs to be a 3.5 Tonner due to her indoors not having the older type licence. Now all I knew about horses until recently is they smell & the only two times I've ridden the damn things they have thrown me off.

However I've since learned that 16 2 in horse speak is not feet & inches or meters it's some form of measurement thats only applicable to horses, yet horseboxes are measured in feet & inches or meters banghead

So I'd thought I'd ask amongst the PH massive, who might have or have had a Horsebox ideally the 3.5 ton variety for their suggestions & avoidances. Especially when it comes to weight limits & payloads.

We previously owned a lovely little Ifor William 2 horse jobbie on a retro gem of Bedford CF, it was great & did the job well until we came to put the big fat tall horse in which: A would'nt go in on its own & B would'nt fit through the smaller door on the way out hehe C However legally the Bedford was well within the weight limit unlike many of the newer posh enclosed ones we see of late.

So what is the lightest Chassis cab vehicle available with a GVW of 3.5 Ton, preferbaly that is'nt a rust bucket transit. As possibly looking into buying an Ifor Williams box to go on the back of a chassis cab, as this appears the lightest option.


Your assistance in all matters dobbin related much appreciated




Cyberprog

2,324 posts

213 months

Saturday 26th February 2011
quotequote all
Would it not be easier to get the missus through her C1 or C test? If she's paying for it, then C is only *slightly* harder and a more useful qualification as obviously you could then drive *big* horse transporters smile

cptsideways

Original Poster:

13,884 posts

282 months

Saturday 26th February 2011
quotequote all
Cyberprog said:
Would it not be easier to get the missus through her C1 or C test? If she's paying for it, then C is only *slightly* harder and a more useful qualification as obviously you could then drive *big* horse transporters smile
We are considering this option, but the cost v miles the truck will be used will be fairly prohibitive. I myself have a HGVII If we went that route then I'd be building a dual purpose 16 tonner that doubles as a horsebox as well as a racecar transporter wink

minky monkey

1,566 posts

196 months

Saturday 26th February 2011
quotequote all
Whilst not directly related, most of the 3.5t recovery flat beds are based on the Movano or renault equivalent. They seem to give the most payload of the weight group.

Daniel1

2,931 posts

228 months

Saturday 26th February 2011
quotequote all
My sister is an avid horse person and recently rented a renault/vauxhall movano van conversion to go collect some Emu's(!).

It was the smaller of the two sizes available and she said it was plenty big enough that she wouldnt have to go for the bigger one, has quite a bit of a beavertail type overhang over the rear. Im popping round to see my nephews this afternoon so ill ask her what she thought of it.

mercfunder

8,535 posts

203 months

Saturday 26th February 2011
quotequote all
16.2 Hands equals 5' 6" or 1.67m, but remember that is to the middle of the horse's withers, so add a bit more on for the neck and head.
HTH.;)

LooneyTunes

9,398 posts

188 months

Saturday 26th February 2011
quotequote all
My guess would be that 2 ponies in a 3.5t could well see you overweight (16h would be at least .05t)? Especially as there seems to be some form of horse height inflation whenever they change the things (but I suppose we're guilty of always wanting more "horses" too?)

We used to run a 7.5 tonner but, quite frankly, it was a PITA and cost a small fortune to keep on the road. We did the maths and decided it was cheaper (and more reliable) for Mrs LT to run a 4x4 with 3.5t towing capacity - bear in mind that not all have this due to the trend towards lighter vehicles - and buy a decent trailer (lots out there that will take a 16h2 with ease).

Not quite the question you asked, but hope it helps.

Fish981

1,441 posts

215 months

Saturday 26th February 2011
quotequote all
LooneyTunes said:
My guess would be that 2 ponies in a 3.5t could well see you overweight (16h would be at least .05t)?
[...]
An 8 stone horse? Cute ;-)

Super Slo Mo

5,374 posts

228 months

Saturday 26th February 2011
quotequote all
LooneyTunes said:
My guess would be that 2 ponies in a 3.5t could well see you overweight (16h would be at least .05t)? Especially as there seems to be some form of horse height inflation whenever they change the things (but I suppose we're guilty of always wanting more "horses" too?)

We used to run a 7.5 tonner but, quite frankly, it was a PITA and cost a small fortune to keep on the road. We did the maths and decided it was cheaper (and more reliable) for Mrs LT to run a 4x4 with 3.5t towing capacity - bear in mind that not all have this due to the trend towards lighter vehicles - and buy a decent trailer (lots out there that will take a 16h2 with ease).

Not quite the question you asked, but hope it helps.
0.05t is only 50 kg's, so it's either a small horse, in which case an estate car would probably suffice, or you need to move the decimal place a bit....

With regards to the 4x4 and trailer, the OP's missus won't be able to use that option as she's got the newer type driver's licence, and can't drive anything weighing more than 3.5 tonnes (a 4x4 plus trailer would exceed this, and anyway, she probably has little or no trailer entitlement anyway), hence the original question.

LooneyTunes

9,398 posts

188 months

Saturday 26th February 2011
quotequote all
My bad on the weights - typing with a helpful toddler (demanding tractor vids on other side of screen) isn't always the easiest! smile

Super Slo Mo said:
With regards to the 4x4 and trailer, the OP's missus won't be able to use that option as she's got the newer type driver's licence, and can't drive anything weighing more than 3.5 tonnes (a 4x4 plus trailer would exceed this, and anyway, she probably has little or no trailer entitlement anyway), hence the original question.
My thinking was that it must be relatively easy to gain the extra entitlements? One time task could save a few quid every year...?

cptsideways

Original Poster:

13,884 posts

282 months

Saturday 26th February 2011
quotequote all
LooneyTunes said:
My bad on the weights - typing with a helpful toddler (demanding tractor vids on other side of screen) isn't always the easiest! smile

Super Slo Mo said:
With regards to the 4x4 and trailer, the OP's missus won't be able to use that option as she's got the newer type driver's licence, and can't drive anything weighing more than 3.5 tonnes (a 4x4 plus trailer would exceed this, and anyway, she probably has little or no trailer entitlement anyway), hence the original question.
My thinking was that it must be relatively easy to gain the extra entitlements? One time task could save a few quid every year...?
The trailer issue has rissen previously, she had a go at that & failed dismally hehe Partly through lack of experience & partly through not wanting to learn from an old master (proper lessons only she said) We do have a big Landcruiser that would perfect for towing duties but quite often the case I'm using it on race weekends wink

There is option to do the HGV + Plus Trailer test, which would mean she can drive just about anything + a trailer.

Trying to find 3.5 ton chassis cab comparisons is a nightmare, few of the manufacturers list that info, anyone in the truck business have a list?

jagracer

8,248 posts

266 months

Saturday 26th February 2011
quotequote all
I may have missed it but when did she pass her test? if before 1997 then go for an up to 7.5 tonner as you will be near or over the weight limit with a 3.5 tonner. If she doesn't have the larger vehicle licence then it's not that difficult to pass and well worth the hassle. One other point to note is that if you are intending coming within most of the M25 then don't get anything that's older than a 2007ish job as it's cost you £200 per day if you register with TFL or £1K per day if you don't and you get caught.

ClippertyClop

12 posts

186 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
You might want to look into the converted panel vans on the market, alot of the front wheel drive ones have low floors n over 1000kg payloads.
How much do ya horses weigh?
The weigh tapes you can measure them with are pretty accurate.
CC x

Stephanie Plum

2,797 posts

241 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
Two x 16.2hh and you will be overweight. No ifs or buts. I had a converted VW but they're quite old now, done by Olympic who used to be Newbury way. The Ifor williams boxes on Transit type chassis are very high off the ground, inherently unstable and horrible to drive ime, and I wouldn't go that route. You might find the horses will be reluctant to load after a while as well as they'll get an uncomfortable ride.

The Renault conversions are ok but not cheap. She really needs to take her licence if she wants to carry two horses and go for a min 5t payload - there are a lot more options that way. Sticking to 3.5 will cause headaches and you'll end up with a poor compromise, with the constant worry about being pulled in for a weight check.

(Edited for rubbish spelling)

Fast Bug

13,580 posts

191 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
The payload of a chassis cab is irrelevant really, you'd need to know the weight of the converted body that sits on top of it which you'll struggle to find. Front wheel drive vehicles will have a higher payload, Renault Master Loloaders have a good payload and have a pretty big box on the back and would be easy to convert in to a horse box

cptsideways

Original Poster:

13,884 posts

282 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
To give you an update we ended buying a Renault Master lwb LowLoader van. Low floor chassis and a 1260kg payload as standard.

I spent 6 weeks converting it with a side loading ramp and all fitted out inside. Its superb for what we need. Its also really nice to drive with a 120dci 6 speed.

It still has a payload of 1160kgs with half a tank of fuel so two 16h horses should be do able legally.

Cost was about 4k to convert with me doing all the work.

Fast Bug

13,580 posts

191 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
cptsideways said:
To give you an update we ended buying a Renault Master lwb LowLoader van. Low floor chassis and a 1260kg payload as standard.

I spent 6 weeks converting it with a side loading ramp and all fitted out inside. Its superb for what we need. Its also really nice to drive with a 120dci 6 speed.

It still has a payload of 1160kgs with half a tank of fuel so two 16h horses should be do able legally.

Cost was about 4k to convert with me doing all the work.
What do I win? bounce

cptsideways

Original Poster:

13,884 posts

282 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
Here it is complete with wifey,s dobbin doing a dump on its first outing in the truck


Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

276 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
When Richard Hammond tires of blowing up caravans I would cheerfully nominate horse-boxes as his next target!

tank