The winter tyre debate moves to the winged variant..
The winter tyre debate moves to the winged variant..
Author
Discussion

Chuck328

Original Poster:

1,633 posts

196 months

Saturday 26th February 2011
quotequote all
"Right number one, on my mark, handbrake in 3,2,1, now!" biggrin

http://www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/artikkel.php?ar...

khaosai

120 posts

228 months

Saturday 26th February 2011
quotequote all
Skillfully done !

dvs_dave

9,040 posts

254 months

Sunday 27th February 2011
quotequote all
Wouldn't of happened if it was a 4x4. wink

Sonic

4,008 posts

236 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2011
quotequote all
laugh

Eric Mc

125,601 posts

294 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2011
quotequote all
dvs_dave said:
Wouldn't of happened if it was a 4x4. wink
It's "HAVE" not "OF"smile

Anyway.

Better grip on soft surfaces has been striven for in the past -


Fume troll

4,389 posts

241 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2011
quotequote all
Oh look, a plane on a conveyor belt...

ETA: I assume the tracks were to reduce ground pressure rather than increase grip?

Cheers,

FT.

Munter

31,331 posts

270 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2011
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
It's "HAVE" not "OF"smile

Anyway.

Better grip on soft surfaces has been striven for in the past -

I don't think the problem there was a soft surface....

Eric Mc

125,601 posts

294 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2011
quotequote all
More like a soft head.

dvs_dave

9,040 posts

254 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2011
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
cop

Chuck328

Original Poster:

1,633 posts

196 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2011
quotequote all
Cracking pic Mr M, however I reckon even those tracks might struggle on solid ice? (might be fun to try anyway smile)

Where did you find that pic? Assuming no photo-shop, what A/C is that?

Cheers

Eric Mc

125,601 posts

294 months

Thursday 3rd March 2011
quotequote all
The USAF ran some tests in the 1950s on the feasibility of caterpiller tracked undercarriages. From what I've read, two aircraft were converted - a B-50 and a B-36.

The system was never adopted.

Fume troll

4,389 posts

241 months

Thursday 3rd March 2011
quotequote all
XB-36 nerd

They tried massive 9'2" tyres too, before adopting a four wheel bogey design.



Cheers,

FT.

prand

6,244 posts

225 months

Thursday 3rd March 2011
quotequote all
Fume troll said:
XB-36 nerd

They tried massive 9'2" tyres too, before adopting a four wheel bogey design.



Cheers,

FT.
Is that plane flying backwards or forwards - propellers on the wrong way!

Eric Mc

125,601 posts

294 months

Thursday 3rd March 2011
quotequote all
That's the way it was built. Pusher propellors are not that unusual.

Have a look at the B-36 thread - it has one all its own.

Captain Cadillac

2,974 posts

216 months

Thursday 3rd March 2011
quotequote all
Chuck328 said:
"Right number one, on my mark, handbrake in 3,2,1, now!" biggrin

http://www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/artikkel.php?ar...
That's fantastic! Too bad I can't read Viking tho frown

Hooli

32,278 posts

229 months

Thursday 3rd March 2011
quotequote all
Chuck328 said:
"Right number one, on my mark, handbrake in 3,2,1, now!" biggrin

http://www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/artikkel.php?ar...
hehe

Excellent work there.