A rather forlorn Lambo :(
A rather forlorn Lambo :(
Author
Discussion

twiglove

Original Poster:

1,178 posts

225 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
Spotted this in a body shop car park, Apparently it has been there a while, It supposedly belongs to a trader nr Newbury.

Looking in need of some work, Not on MID, no tax etc

Apologies for the pics, I could get more if necessary!






LordGrover

34,189 posts

243 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
It does look rather unloved...

Is that Lady Penelope's car next door? wink

Craig

1,212 posts

315 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all

twiglove

Original Poster:

1,178 posts

225 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
Wow, it certainly doesn't look anything like it does in those pics...

It looks a mess to be honest..

If it is going through Coys, I thought it would have been picked up and prettied up for the auction?

It was still in Newbury this morning at 9am

UH-Matt

2,173 posts

271 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
Perhaps it was sat in Newbury about to go for some treatment in the bodyshop or something..

dealmaker

2,215 posts

285 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
How does it have open headlights if it was manufactured in 91 ??? An why was it not sold until 99?? Strange???

Craig

1,212 posts

315 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
twiglove said:
Wow, it certainly doesn't look anything like it does in those pics...

It looks a mess to be honest..

If it is going through Coys, I thought it would have been picked up and prettied up for the auction?

It was still in Newbury this morning at 9am
sorry - Bonhams auction is tomorrow. This is going through Coys next week 8 March

twiglove

Original Poster:

1,178 posts

225 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
UH-Matt said:
Perhaps it was sat in Newbury about to go for some treatment in the bodyshop or something..
The body shop, although good, is not a specialist for supercars though, more a volvo, ford etc type bodyshop.

It would need LOTS of work to get it looking like the pictures

Craig

1,212 posts

315 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
looks like a dog's dinner to me

it's an early 1991 car but they have changed the front lights for the later closed versions, changed the steering wheel and, worst of all, replaced the engine cover with some scoops which are trying to replicate the SV but are not the correct part

it was registered in 1999 in the UK so must have been abroad until then

the estimate looks way too high to me but what do I know?!

UH-Matt

2,173 posts

271 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
twiglove said:
UH-Matt said:
Perhaps it was sat in Newbury about to go for some treatment in the bodyshop or something..
The body shop, although good, is not a specialist for supercars though, more a volvo, ford etc type bodyshop.

It would need LOTS of work to get it looking like the pictures
It looks tired because the paint is not in the best shape. Full respray before 8th March? Perhaps the owner owns the paint shop smile

twiglove

Original Poster:

1,178 posts

225 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
UH-Matt said:
It looks tired because the paint is not in the best shape. Full respray before 8th March? Perhaps the owner owns the paint shop smile
Good thinking, However I know the owner (it isn't his) , but he wasn't there this morning to ask further details smile

jdw1234

6,021 posts

246 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
Must have been imported from the USA from the looks of those tasteless houses in the advert.

That perhaps would explain the T registration.


Mattymouse33

1,276 posts

238 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
Can someone tell me what im missing. All i see is a missing wing mirror, paintwork looks fine and the car doesnt actually look that dirty?? Obviously its been modified.

XXVIII

2,800 posts

245 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
... agree with Craig - it's the mutt's last meal that said mutt has just chucked back up due to tasting a bit rotten somehow - there is certainly something not-very-right about that car scratchchin...

the advert says:


The example you see here was manufactured in 1991 though not actually registered until 1999. It has been in a private collection for the past few years and has been used very sparingly, with only 3,500 miles showing on the odometer from new. The appearance has been enhanced with an upgraded front spoiler, wheels and air intake to SV specification. In 2009 the car was sent to Lamborghini London for service and recommissioning, and has completed a nominal mileage since. The car will be supplied with a current MOT certificate, V5 registration document, and owner's manual

The 1990s supercars are being heavily tipped as the next big thing from an appreciation point of view, so this is an excellent chance to own a sensational-looking example with an extremely low mileage.

Estimate: £65,000 - £70,000


... that skinny slab of rubbery-looking something not-proper is not an SV spec. engine cover and the wing mirrors are in body colour when the earliest Diablo's were grey or black, the wing looks like an SV wing but only if you squint at it and forget the probability that they may well be an aftermarket versions of those items and in the case of the engine cover, a very bad one at that. As Matty noted a mirror is missing which is something and nothing really but I see that the small surround of the fog / reversing lights is black/grey though factory-supplied in-period promotional images show that element to be body colour.

All that overgenerous estimate of quality of the car in the first place, the suggestion of extra value based on the very slight added provenance of a service nearly two years ago and recommissioning prior to yet another spell of damaging underuse is just over-egging the scruffy mess that this car has sadly become, im(not-so h)o

mind you, the contention that 90s supercars are the next big collectable thing seems a great idea biggrin though there's a right hooker '93 2wd Diablo in Scotland with great provenance and a very, very detailed history for £46k. It may have ten times the mileage of the auction car but I'd sooner have that and some evidence of good use then a left hooker and a lot of queries (as yet) unanswered.

burriana

16,556 posts

285 months

Tuesday 8th March 2011
quotequote all
XXVIII said:
mind you, the contention that 90s supercars are the next big collectable thing seems a great idea biggrin
Like that bit yes

XXVIII said:
though there's a right hooker '93 2wd Diablo in Scotland with great provenance and a very, very detailed history for £46k.
Wish you hadn't told me that bit!

smile

rubystone

11,254 posts

290 months

Tuesday 8th March 2011
quotequote all
burriana said:
Wish you hadn't told me that bit!

smile
I spotted that car some time ago - seemed a good buy if you accept the fact it's an early car...and it's been for sale for some time, so price may move....

Craig

1,212 posts

315 months

Wednesday 9th March 2011
quotequote all
well this car didn't make its reserve at auction - bidding stopped at £50k which is way more than it's worth IMO (buyers premium would be another £8k at that price)

it didn't look any better in the flesh either

twiglove

Original Poster:

1,178 posts

225 months

Wednesday 9th March 2011
quotequote all
Craig said:
well this car didn't make its reserve at auction - bidding stopped at £50k which is way more than it's worth IMO (buyers premium would be another £8k at that price)

it didn't look any better in the flesh either
So it had not had any work done to it in preparation then?

What happens to it now then, will it just get sent back to the owner until they decide what to do with it.

What do you think it is worth Craig?



Craig

1,212 posts

315 months

Wednesday 9th March 2011
quotequote all
they had polished it up but that roof scoop attempt was a right mess - pop riveted on! also the paint on the front spoiler was a slightly different colour to the rest of the car

I wouldn't go near it - the only thing in its favour is the mileage but the non originality kills its value

difficult to put a price on it but somewhere near £40k

rubystone

11,254 posts

290 months

Wednesday 9th March 2011
quotequote all
Craig said:
they had polished it up but that roof scoop attempt was a right mess - pop riveted on! also the paint on the front spoiler was a slightly different colour to the rest of the car

I wouldn't go near it - the only thing in its favour is the mileage but the non originality kills its value

difficult to put a price on it but somewhere near £40k
How the hell does a car like that make anywhere near that money? Far better to buy an earlier car with a better provenance!