Which news channel is least likely...
Discussion
...To treat its viewers like complete idiots. im sick of bbc and sky. russia today offered a little restbite until i saw it doing a little panick mongering this morning.
is there a news channel that just gives the facts as they are and doesn just blab on pointlessly speculating and not backing upstatements with not just facts but figured too.
i.e russia today keep comparing toyoko to cheynoble.... fk is it any thing like that clusterfk of a melt down.
do i have any options or shoul i just not bother watching the news and get m info elsewhere?
is there a news channel that just gives the facts as they are and doesn just blab on pointlessly speculating and not backing upstatements with not just facts but figured too.
i.e russia today keep comparing toyoko to cheynoble.... fk is it any thing like that clusterfk of a melt down.
do i have any options or shoul i just not bother watching the news and get m info elsewhere?
SystemParanoia said:
...To treat its viewers like complete idiots. im sick of bbc and sky. russia today offered a little restbite until i saw it doing a little panick mongering this morning.
is there a news channel that just gives the facts as they are and doesn just blab on pointlessly speculating and not backing upstatements with not just facts but figured too.
i.e russia today keep comparing toyoko to cheynoble.... fk is it any thing like that clusterfk of a melt down.
do i have any options or shoul i just not bother watching the news and get m info elsewhere?
To be fair to them, surely this IS now comparable to chernobyl?is there a news channel that just gives the facts as they are and doesn just blab on pointlessly speculating and not backing upstatements with not just facts but figured too.
i.e russia today keep comparing toyoko to cheynoble.... fk is it any thing like that clusterfk of a melt down.
do i have any options or shoul i just not bother watching the news and get m info elsewhere?
SystemParanoia said:
sorry for my spelling.im on my kindle and it sometimes doesnt egister key presses.
cheynoble didnt occour by way of naturaldisaster tho did it.
then theres the conflicting reports of background radiation level.... jus tell me how many rads and let m work it out myself ffs.
You really aren't doing yourself any favours. cheynoble didnt occour by way of naturaldisaster tho did it.
then theres the conflicting reports of background radiation level.... jus tell me how many rads and let m work it out myself ffs.
Try FOX news.
SystemParanoia said:
sorry for my spelling.im on my kindle and it sometimes doesnt egister key presses.
cheynoble didnt occour by way of naturaldisaster tho did it.
then theres the conflicting reports of background radiation level.... jus tell me how many rads and let m work it out myself ffs.
I'd be more bothered by the Sieverts than a 'largely obsolete unit of absorbed radiation dose'cheynoble didnt occour by way of naturaldisaster tho did it.
then theres the conflicting reports of background radiation level.... jus tell me how many rads and let m work it out myself ffs.
Gassing Station | TV, Film, Video Streaming & Radio | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff