Nick Freeman and George Monbiot on motorway speed limits
Nick Freeman and George Monbiot on motorway speed limits
Author
Discussion

Diabolik

Original Poster:

1,222 posts

190 months

Thursday 17th March 2011
quotequote all
BBC Link

What a wker George Monbiot comes across as, regardless of who is right or wrong.

Makes for an interesting debate.

Negative Creep

26,060 posts

256 months

Thursday 17th March 2011
quotequote all
Is it just me who thinks 135 deaths is actually a really low figure?

CampDavid

9,145 posts

227 months

Thursday 17th March 2011
quotequote all
George comes across as smug while already having made up his mind on the issue. It was pointless him having any real input as all he did was snipe and talk over.

drivin_me_nuts

17,949 posts

240 months

Thursday 17th March 2011
quotequote all
Negative Creep said:
Is it just me who thinks 135 deaths is actually a really low figure?
I think so to. Considering the sheer millions of motorway miles travelled every year, it seems indeed a low figure. I'm not convinced there is a real need to up the limit, given the fact that the de facto limit seems to be 80-90 anyway. I'd rather the present situation than to have radar man sitting on every bridge ticketing drivers doing fractions over a strictly enforced limit.


Diabolik

Original Poster:

1,222 posts

190 months

Thursday 17th March 2011
quotequote all
Does seem low. Also surprises me about how many people I hear of crashing/rolling their car and walking away without a scratch, and that's usually in tiny French boxes.

maniac0796

1,292 posts

195 months

Thursday 17th March 2011
quotequote all
Negative Creep said:
Is it just me who thinks 135 deaths is actually a really low figure?
Considering how man miles of motorway there is, the volume of traffic on it, and the sheer range of intellegence that can drive a car, I think that's a pretty good acheivment.

As long as humans still have control, you will never get 0 deaths. Anyone who hopes for that is in denial.

GhostDriver

879 posts

221 months

Thursday 17th March 2011
quotequote all
[redacted]

Jasandjules

72,588 posts

258 months

Thursday 17th March 2011
quotequote all
[redacted]

turboman786

1,131 posts

216 months

Thursday 17th March 2011
quotequote all
Nick Freeman doesn't sounds particularly convincing in what he is trying to say...

Jasandjules

72,588 posts

258 months

Thursday 17th March 2011
quotequote all
turboman786 said:
Nick Freeman doesn't sounds particularly convincing in what he is trying to say...
Neither of them are authorities on road safety though are they?!!??!

munroman

1,907 posts

213 months

Thursday 17th March 2011
quotequote all
First time I've seen Mobiot in action.

wker! smile

Parrot of Doom

23,075 posts

263 months

Thursday 17th March 2011
quotequote all
I wouldn't mind betting a very significant portion of those 135 deaths occurs on the hard shoulder, and which type of vehicle is one most likely to be hit by while on the hard shoulder?

redstu

2,287 posts

268 months

Thursday 17th March 2011
quotequote all
Parrot of Doom said:
I wouldn't mind betting a very significant portion of those 135 deaths occurs on the hard shoulder, and which type of vehicle is one most likely to be hit by while on the hard shoulder?
exactly , the statistics need to be broken down and categorized so that an informed opinion can be made.


nouze

853 posts

206 months

Thursday 17th March 2011
quotequote all
that chin, I'm unable to concentrate on what they're saying

Gun

13,432 posts

247 months

Thursday 17th March 2011
quotequote all
Monboit really comes across as a utter tt in that 'debate'. I liken his attitude to speed in this to those who stated back in the day that anyone who used one of those new fangled trains would instantly die due to the speed.