What would you choose, and why: s2000, Z4 2.5, VX220 2.2
What would you choose, and why: s2000, Z4 2.5, VX220 2.2
Author
Discussion

JFReturns

Original Poster:

3,828 posts

200 months

Friday 1st April 2011
quotequote all
I'm having trouble choosing my next car, so which of the three would you choose and why?

- Rev 2 Honda S2000
- BMW Z4 2.5
- VX220 2.2 n/a

A few points to consider - it will be used for a short commute to work twice a week (I cycle most of the week) and weekend fun so MPG not a huge issue. 8k budget, and this car will replace both my current cars so needs to be at least as practical as the '5. No kids and I'm 30 so child seats and insurance aren't too much of a worry....

Over to you smile

macp

4,823 posts

212 months

Friday 1st April 2011
quotequote all
Just a thought why not a Z4 3.0 if mpg not an issue and probably no more juicy than the 2.5

LewLew

80 posts

186 months

Friday 1st April 2011
quotequote all
I would have the s2000 couldnt tell you why but took one for a test drive a few years ago and loved it. You get the "real sports car" feeling from them.

all are good options though, and what a nice problem to have smile

wackojacko

8,581 posts

219 months

Friday 1st April 2011
quotequote all


- Rev 2 Honda S2000 very good cars, fun to drive , great engines, great sound. Although it's driving still that it demands is not to everyone's taste.
- BMW Z4 2.5 - Z4 has to be the 3.0
- VX220 2.2 n/a Also very good fun cars to drive.
I'd suggest test drive both and decide which you like most as the driving styles required are different etc.




Mazdarese

21,350 posts

216 months

Friday 1st April 2011
quotequote all
Tough one, but I think they are all quite different.

The VX is very raw.

The Z4 is luxurious.

The S2000 is maybe a middleman between the two?

I'd go for the S2000, as I've always wanted one.

JFReturns

Original Poster:

3,828 posts

200 months

Friday 1st April 2011
quotequote all
macp said:
Just a thought why not a Z4 3.0 if mpg not an issue and probably no more juicy than the 2.5
The MPG difference between the two is tiny, ~ 2 mpg, but I thought a tidy 3.0 would be beyond my budget...

Does the 2.5 feel gutless then?

jt racing

561 posts

203 months

Friday 1st April 2011
quotequote all
Vx 220 for me.
Rare enough, plus I love mid engine cars!

LewLew

80 posts

186 months

Friday 1st April 2011
quotequote all
JFReturns said:
The MPG difference between the two is tiny, ~ 2 mpg, but I thought a tidy 3.0 would be beyond my budget...

Does the 2.5 feel gutless then?
Dont think it would keep up with the other 2

Rum Runner

2,345 posts

246 months

Friday 1st April 2011
quotequote all
None, TVR Chimaera...less likely to kill yourself in one than a S2000 and probably break down les than the other 2. Certainly cheaper to run.

macp

4,823 posts

212 months

Friday 1st April 2011
quotequote all
JFReturns said:
The MPG difference between the two is tiny, ~ 2 mpg, but I thought a tidy 3.0 would be beyond my budget...

Does the 2.5 feel gutless then?
Could be a smidgeon over budget have not driven one but if its like any other BM the difference will be noticeable.

http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/2011...

98elise

32,579 posts

190 months

Friday 1st April 2011
quotequote all
Mazdarese said:
The VX is very raw.
Not when you own an S1 elise smile

steve_bmw

1,591 posts

204 months

Friday 1st April 2011
quotequote all
2.5 is not gutless, the z4 is a brilliant car, you need the 2.5 or 3.0, i wouldnt have a 2.0 as it dosent sound so good, you need streight 6.
drove the s2000 and didnt like the way it drove, you gotta ring it's neck to get anything out of it, becomes very tedious after a while, its hard work, and the cabin is very cramped.
never been in a vx220 but i supose its very much like an elise, fine for a weekend car but i wouldnt want to drive it everyday.
z4 is the best looking, with 108 bbs wheels.

Gallen

2,166 posts

284 months

Friday 1st April 2011
quotequote all
older 911 personally due to 8k budget.

Boxster S

other than that, VX probably the best drivers car out of that bunch.

I like the S2000 but for me it is too much of a middle man, with a reputation of liking to go backwards when you were already going forwards!

Z4 - Probably take the 3.0 over the S2000 as I think the V-Tec 9000rpm might make for a tiring drive? (correct me if wrong though).


steve_bmw

1,591 posts

204 months

Friday 1st April 2011
quotequote all
LewLew said:
Dont think it would keep up with the other 2
probably right there mate, but i think the z4 is more of a sporty cruiser than the other two, depends what you want it for, if it was a track car then yes vx220 all the way, but for a pose, z4 wins.smile

TimS2000

453 posts

236 months

Friday 1st April 2011
quotequote all
S2000 all day for me (which is lucky as I've got one! biggrin ).

Practical and reliable enough for the week, and more than enough fun for the weekends.
In comparison to the other two, the Z4 would be slow (3.0 would be a better match) and not as fun or raw a driving experience (considering you do minimal commuting in it), and the VX while probably ultimately more fun at 10/10ths, you may tire pretty quickly of trying to clamber in and out of it on a daily basis, the crap heater, and personally I'd be scared to pack it anywhere because one careless twunt damaging the clam may cost you £££££s

edited to add: ignore the doomsayers about dying in the s2k, you could die in 1.0 city car if you drove like a tt. Respect the fact you have 245bhp rwd car with no traction control, drive accordingly, and make sure you don't buy Linglong tyres then you will not have any problems at all smile

Edited by TimS2000 on Friday 1st April 15:45

Mazdarese

21,350 posts

216 months

Friday 1st April 2011
quotequote all
98elise said:
Mazdarese said:
The VX is very raw.
Not when you own an S1 elise smile
Natch! biggrin

RossP

2,603 posts

312 months

Friday 1st April 2011
quotequote all
S2000! - Good all-rounder from commuting, to long distances and equally at home on the track. Reliable and cheap to service. Also decent MPG if not using VTEC all the time (which you will be of course...)

Z4 - boulevard cruiser

VX220 - more of a trackday toy.

edo

16,699 posts

294 months

Friday 1st April 2011
quotequote all
macp said:
Just a thought why not a Z4 3.0 if mpg not an issue and probably no more juicy than the 2.5
This

shambolic

2,146 posts

196 months

Friday 1st April 2011
quotequote all
I'd go for the ZED but then I have an E89 so I may be a bit biased, have a look on here

http://www.z4-forum.com/forum/

sebhaque

6,534 posts

210 months

Friday 1st April 2011
quotequote all
All good choices, I'm slightly biased so I won't offer any choices but I can tell you what it's like to live with a VX - I only use mine on weekends although occasionally I'll take it to work and back for a week (~130 miles to the digs for work, a few miles commuting in it) - no problems, it can get a little cold sometimes but in a coat or jacket there's no problem. Visibility is surprisingly good, although you need to make sure you check your blindspots as things can be hidden behind the window, and the ride, while firm, doesn't cause any aches or pains, even after 2 and a bit hours on the motorway. Also a bit rarer than a Z4 or S2000 so there's that warm feeling you get when you spot it parked amongst a sea of other cars.

Drawbacks? It's a bit more cramped than the other cars, if you regularly have a pax then it might be worth considering something a bit more spacious - I'm a pretty small chap (no 18 stone goatees here) but I still found myself elbowing whoever was in the other seat when I went to change gear or apply the handbrake. Creature comforts are lacking - no power steering (not that it really needs it), windy windows, no traction control, and the heater is rather poor.

Nice STi, by the way, I used to have one myself. smile