Brake disc's
Brake disc's
Author
Discussion

Mr Tank

Original Poster:

5,797 posts

299 months

Friday 8th April 2011
quotequote all
Hi

I know this is a well asked question, but here goes!

Just put the 4.5 cerbie back on the road after the winter.
It sailed through it's MOT but yesterday I started to get brake judger.
My set up is original and I know you can,t get new disc. I like to keep my cars as original as poiss what option's are there bearing that in mind?

Andy

Steve_T

6,356 posts

296 months

Friday 8th April 2011
quotequote all
You can get AP 330x28 rotors and use a 4mm thick spacer for the caliper and keep the original bells if that's what you have. It's about twice the price of the later 1 piece discs though! Definitely keep the bells.

Gazzab

21,583 posts

306 months

Friday 8th April 2011
quotequote all
Check 'drag bushes' before you start changing discs.

Gazzab

21,583 posts

306 months

Friday 8th April 2011
quotequote all
Steve_T said:
You can get AP 330x28 rotors and use a 4mm thick spacer for the caliper and keep the original bells if that's what you have. It's about twice the price of the later 1 piece discs though! Definitely keep the bells.
Steve - do you know where the spacers can be sourced from?
I want to upgrade my cerb to bells and separate rotors (I have some bells, just need the rotors and spacers).

Steve_T

6,356 posts

296 months

Friday 8th April 2011
quotequote all
It's a 4mm thick piece of plate with two holes in (centres are 152mm apart). The caliper itself sits on two pads about the size of a thumb print, so just get someone to make them up for you.

JensenA

5,671 posts

254 months

Friday 8th April 2011
quotequote all
Think twice before doing it - Using the bigger discs the caliper will catch the outside circumference edge of the disc. Hence the need for spacers. This pushes the caliper outwards, so it clears the disc. What this does though, is reduce the amount of pad to disc contact as the top part of the pad does not come into contact with the disc. You'll have lighter discs due to the alloy bells, but possibly less stopping power.

mikethebike1127

170 posts

195 months

Friday 8th April 2011
quotequote all
Gazzab said:
Check 'drag bushes' before you start changing discs.
100% agree......I just changed mine (£15 each for the poly ones) when I still had judder after a brake rebuild and disc skim....what a transformation and it only takes 20mins a side.

skidoo

400 posts

214 months

Friday 8th April 2011
quotequote all
mikethebike1127 said:
100% agree......I just changed mine (£15 each for the poly ones) when I still had judder after a brake rebuild and disc skim....what a transformation and it only takes 20mins a side.
+1 yes

BCA

8,651 posts

281 months

Friday 8th April 2011
quotequote all
We have the larger disks fitted to our Cerb, I know you prefer OE, but they look the business under RL7s. Our T350C brakes look tiny in comparison, it doesnt appear to brake as well either - they're not bad, its just Cerbera brakes are awesome. thumbup

Basil Brush

5,540 posts

287 months

Friday 8th April 2011
quotequote all
JensenA said:
Think twice before doing it - Using the bigger discs the caliper will catch the outside circumference edge of the disc. Hence the need for spacers. This pushes the caliper outwards, so it clears the disc. What this does though, is reduce the amount of pad to disc contact as the top part of the pad does not come into contact with the disc. You'll have lighter discs due to the alloy bells, but possibly less stopping power.
?? That doesn't seem to make sense?

Gazzab

21,583 posts

306 months

Friday 8th April 2011
quotequote all
Makes sense to me :-) :-(

jammy_basturd

29,778 posts

236 months

Friday 8th April 2011
quotequote all
Basil Brush said:
JensenA said:
Think twice before doing it - Using the bigger discs the caliper will catch the outside circumference edge of the disc. Hence the need for spacers. This pushes the caliper outwards, so it clears the disc. What this does though, is reduce the amount of pad to disc contact as the top part of the pad does not come into contact with the disc. You'll have lighter discs due to the alloy bells, but possibly less stopping power.
?? That doesn't seem to make sense?
The middle bit of the top of the pad is off the edge of the disc therefore doesn't come into contact with the disc. Slightly less contact = less friction = less braking.

Having said that, wouldn't this slight decrease in drag not be (at least partially) be counteracted by the increased leverage afforded by moving the caliper further out?

Basil Brush

5,540 posts

287 months

Friday 8th April 2011
quotequote all
But if the disc radius increase is the same as the spacer (322 to 330 discs therefore 4mm radius increase) the outer edge of the pad should be in the same relative position as before. What am I missing?

MackemPete

965 posts

242 months

Friday 8th April 2011
quotequote all
It makes sense in a common sense sort of way... but isnt friction = frictional coefficient x Mass (or in this case pressure from caliper pistons)

So *in theory* even if you had half the size pads they would still exert the same friction on the disk at the same pressure as the larger pads. Obviously the smaller area wouldnt be great as it would lead to more heat in the pads etc. Overlapping the edge of the disk might cause some funny noises when the pads start to wear around the disk, dont know it might not?

jammy_basturd

29,778 posts

236 months

Friday 8th April 2011
quotequote all
Basil Brush said:
But if the disc radius increase is the same as the spacer (322 to 330 discs therefore 4mm radius increase) the outer edge of the pad should be in the same relative position as before. What am I missing?
The outer circumference of the pad is smaller than the outer circumference of the disc, therefore the middle of the pad is off the disc and the corners of the pad are on.

OP: Stick a straight rule across your disc. If the disc isn't too worn just get them skimmed.

jonbarrett

800 posts

226 months

Friday 8th April 2011
quotequote all
Another one for drag link bushes. Spent a year trying to solve my brake judder. It was the bushes.

Basil Brush

5,540 posts

287 months

Friday 8th April 2011
quotequote all
jammy_basturd said:
Basil Brush said:
But if the disc radius increase is the same as the spacer (322 to 330 discs therefore 4mm radius increase) the outer edge of the pad should be in the same relative position as before. What am I missing?
The outer circumference of the pad is smaller than the outer circumference of the disc, therefore the middle of the pad is off the disc and the corners of the pad are on.
Must be a Cerbera thing? I've got the 4.5 calliper/322 disc setup on my Tuscan and the outside edge of the pad lines up with the disc. I still don't see how adding spacers of the same size as the increase in disc radius makes the situation worse but fair enough.


Mr Cerbera

5,148 posts

254 months

Monday 18th June 2012
quotequote all
Mr Tank said:
Hi

I know this is a well asked question, but here goes!

Just put the 4.5 cerbie back on the road after the winter.
It sailed through it's MOT but yesterday I started to get brake judger.
My set up is original and I know you can,t get new disc. I like to keep my cars as original as poiss what option's are there bearing that in mind?

Andy
When I did mine last year a very helpful bloke at AP said that they did a 322mm vented disc and that Powers Performance (ex TVR Power) could fit.

Have heard that Carbone Lorraine are the pads to stop you but will eat discs.

You pays and you takes..... but if you are on original kit then the first two things you want to do are fit steel-braided felxible hoses and bleed with 5.1.

Improves feel and reduces fade.

p.s. Borrow some thighs from Herr Scwarzenegger


ETA
Just re-ead your comment and see that you want to stay orig. in which case the one-piece bell and disc from Powers Performance are the closest you'll get. They also supply a non-squeaky pad set.


Edited by Mr Cerbera on Monday 18th June 21:56


Edited by Mr Cerbera on Tuesday 2nd October 19:19

purpleliability

627 posts

209 months

Monday 18th June 2012
quotequote all
Are the original bells an 8 mounting bolt design? Ie are there 8 bolts to attach the rotor to the bell?

Is this what the 330x28mm disc mentioned above is?

Thanks!

Gray_101

1,118 posts

214 months

Tuesday 19th June 2012
quotequote all
Gazzab said:
Check 'drag bushes' before you start changing discs.
I agree ... Change your drag link bushes first.. Cause when they fail it feels the exact same as warped disc s