When is "News" not "News"?
When is "News" not "News"?
Author
Discussion

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

125,609 posts

294 months

Tuesday 3rd May 2011
quotequote all
I see the Ted Lowe thread in the News Forum was closed down as there was a similar thread in the Sports Forum. Not everyone bothers with the Sports Forum that much but most of us will look at the News Forum.

On what criteria does "the management" decide that someone's death isn't a "news" event?
I domn't recall the Liz Taylor thread being shut down because it should have been in the movie forum.

Shaw Tarse

31,888 posts

232 months

Tuesday 3rd May 2011
quotequote all
I'd be interested too Eric, I posted Henry Cooper's ,ps thanks to the mod who added "Sir" to title, well deserved> RIP in News as I thought it was worthy of such.

Big Al.

69,336 posts

287 months

Tuesday 3rd May 2011
quotequote all
From my perspective in general anything I see that has a news link I will usually move to the News forums.

Sports personalities as with musicians/singers would in the main get moved to Sports/Music etc.

The Ted Lowe one in question had a thread stared on Sunday? IIRC as did Sir Henrie's thread, both of these were placed into sports as that's where they would probably be best known and reach the correct audience.

As you've said some do not ventures into sports forum, like other members do not venture into the news forum.

No real problem with threads running in both sections really, but as the Ted Lowe one I closed was raised today and only had 3 posts the last one being at 8:44 this morning I'd thought I'd combine.

HTH

I just thought that you had inadvertently missed the "Sir" so I took the liberty of adding. smile

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

125,609 posts

294 months

Tuesday 3rd May 2011
quotequote all
I still think deaths should stay in the general news section. Most well known people who die are well known for some reason and there is a good chance we might have a sub-forum that covered their particular profession. If Sir Patrick Moore dies (heaven forbid), will that news end up in the space forum, which is actually referred to as the "Planes, Boats and Trains" forum?

renmure

4,925 posts

253 months

Tuesday 3rd May 2011
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
If Sir Patrick Moore dies (heaven forbid),
I like what you did there wink

ThatPhilBrettGuy

11,810 posts

269 months

Tuesday 3rd May 2011
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
IIf Sir Patrick Moore dies (heaven forbid), will that news end up in the space forum, which is actually referred to as the "Planes, Boats and Trains" forum?
Music. Xylophone wink

tubbystu

3,846 posts

289 months

Wednesday 4th May 2011
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
I see the Ted Lowe thread in the News Forum was closed down as there was a similar thread in the Sports Forum. Not everyone bothers with the Sports Forum that much but most of us will look at the News Forum.

On what criteria does "the management" decide that someone's death isn't a "news" event?
I domn't recall the Liz Taylor thread being shut down because it should have been in the movie forum.
Eric Mc said:
I still think deaths should stay in the general news section. Most well known people who die are well known for some reason and there is a good chance we might have a sub-forum that covered their particular profession. If Sir Patrick Moore dies (heaven forbid), will that news end up in the space forum, which is actually referred to as the "Planes, Boats and Trains" forum?
Big Al. said:
From my perspective in general anything I see that has a news link I will usually move to the News forums.

Sports personalities as with musicians/singers would in the main get moved to Sports/Music etc.

The Ted Lowe one in question had a thread stared on Sunday? IIRC as did Sir Henrie's thread, both of these were placed into sports as that's where they would probably be best known and reach the correct audience.

As you've said some do not ventures into sports forum, like other members do not venture into the news forum.

No real problem with threads running in both sections really, but as the Ted Lowe one I closed was raised today and only had 3 posts the last one being at 8:44 this morning I'd thought I'd combine.
Given that I started the continuing Ted Lowe thread, can I throw my two-penn'orth in.

I started it in the Lounge as I thought this might have the widest audience. Ted Lowe's commentary was a element of many of our lives and the "Sports" sub-fora wasn't the immediate place to put it. News, politics and Economics isn't ideal either really, as it is a bit highbrow maybe. These are more a "Red Top" type of thread, hence placing it in the lounge.

In the old days it would just have gone in the general lounge and been seen by the majority. News of this sort should be left in a forum where the greater readership can pick up on it.

The same applies to the Sir Henry RIP thread.

Both the Richard Holmes RIP thread seems to have survived in the N,P &E. Should they not be (combined) in TV & film ?

I think particularly these tribute threads to national personalities/treasures/heroes should be left, at least for a period of time, in the busier forums so the wider readership can join in.

What happens when, say, Murray Walker, Jackie Stewart or even Bernie E go to the "paddock in the sky" ? And Charlie Watts or Mick Jagger ? Or HM Queen even ?

I would want to discover they have passed away sooner rather than later. Perhaps Ted's death (in many years or course) ultimately will just get moved to "website feedback" ?

Whilst I use "whats new", I do look at the Lounge & N,P & E amongst others first to see what has been occurring and I do not regularly haunt the "sports" pages on here.

Not having a pop here, Al, but sometimes a modicum of appreciation for the dissemination of news to the overall general readership might be considered over and above the desire to move a thread immediately to a relative backwater just because it slightly features a sporting (or music) theme.

There is a time and a place for tidiness smile

CunningPlan

228 posts

189 months

Wednesday 4th May 2011
quotequote all
Should topics be placed where they receive the widest readership, or where they are focused on the section of those who are interested? smile

Pints

18,451 posts

223 months

Wednesday 4th May 2011
quotequote all
Eloquently put, Stu. At this rate we'll be considering an RIP sub-section.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

125,609 posts

294 months

Wednesday 4th May 2011
quotequote all
Well said Stu - my sentiments entirely.

Certain types of News should stay as "News" and not be hived off.