How should we run the country

Poll: How should we run the country

Total Members Polled: 167

Current system: 29
Proportional representation: 35
Alternative vote: 5
Electronic direct democracy: 25
Random selection of MPs: 6
Dictatorship: 33
Direct rule from Brussels : 3
anarcho-syndicalist commune: 8
Only workers can vote: 55
Religion based on tie colour and spelling: 9
Author
Discussion

thinfourth2

Original Poster:

32,414 posts

234 months

Saturday 7th May 2011
quotequote all
So AV has bit the dust and we will have FPTP for the rest of the century and our MPs will continue to use our money to buy our votes.

I think it sucks

What would you want as an electoral system to run the country.

I'm sure i have missed loads of options

JonnyFive

29,904 posts

219 months

Saturday 7th May 2011
quotequote all
Boris for PM?

thinfourth2

Original Poster:

32,414 posts

234 months

Saturday 7th May 2011
quotequote all
JonnyFive said:
Boris for PM?
He would be better as a dictator

Puggit

49,821 posts

278 months

Saturday 7th May 2011
quotequote all
We already have direct rule from Brussels. Where is the 'leave EU' option?

JagLover

46,815 posts

265 months

Saturday 7th May 2011
quotequote all
One important option you have missed is the current system supplemented by an direct voting system.

Some matters need to be decided by a parliamentary system, such as the budget because it involves trading off many different issues.

There are many single issues that could easily be decided by popular vote.

Smoking in Pubs
Legalisation of cannabis
Legal status of Foxhunting
etc

thinfourth2

Original Poster:

32,414 posts

234 months

Saturday 7th May 2011
quotequote all
Puggit said:
We already have direct rule from Brussels. Where is the 'leave EU' option?
Then what?

Leaving europe is not relevant to this as once we have left europe we still have to run ourselves some way.

If you want to leave the EU then vote UKIP but you can't vote UKIP as that might let the wrong party in.

thinfourth2

Original Poster:

32,414 posts

234 months

Saturday 7th May 2011
quotequote all
JagLover said:
One important option you have missed is the current system supplemented by an direct voting system.

Some matters need to be decided by a parliamentary system, such as the budget because it involves trading off many different issues.

There are many single issues that could easily be decided by popular vote.

Smoking in Pubs
Legalisation of cannabis
Legal status of Foxhunting
etc
Thats closer to a direct democracy then the current system which is an X once every 5 years and then fk off you little peasants and give me your money for 5 years

anonymous-user

84 months

Saturday 7th May 2011
quotequote all
I picked three options, I would like to see a combination of an electronic direct democracy, randomly selected 'MPs' and and electro-anarchist commune thingy.

Puggit

49,821 posts

278 months

Saturday 7th May 2011
quotequote all
Leaving Europe is very relevant. I voted against AV as it doesn't matter how I vote, Parliament just rubber stamps EU law. I see no reason to change how we elect MPs on the basis that they don't really run this country anyway.

For the record, my Tory MP had a 250 majority going in to 2010 and I still voted UKIP.

I'm sure you'll tell me that UKIP favour AV and it would give them a greater voice. As UKIP votes prevented the Tories gaining an outright majority, I feel FPTP suits my vote better.

thinfourth2

Original Poster:

32,414 posts

234 months

Saturday 7th May 2011
quotequote all
Puggit said:
For the record, my Tory MP had a 250 majority going in to 2010 and I still voted UKIP.

I'm sure you'll tell me that UKIP favour AV and it would give them a greater voice. As UKIP votes prevented the Tories gaining an outright majority, I feel FPTP suits my vote better.
If everyone had the courage and conviction to vote for who they want we would be better off as a nation and FPTP would be fine.

Sadly huge parts of the population votes for who they believe has the best change to defeat the party they dislike the most.

GKP

15,099 posts

271 months

Saturday 7th May 2011
quotequote all
I'm not convinced we should leave the EU, but we should certainly be able to pick and choose which of their directives we decide to implement.


Like every other EU country already does.

Mon Ami Mate

6,589 posts

298 months

Saturday 7th May 2011
quotequote all
When you say "workers", do you mean taxpayers?

If you subscribe to the view that there should be no taxation without representation, is it not logical to argue that there should be no representation without taxation?

Mon Ami Mate

6,589 posts

298 months

Saturday 7th May 2011
quotequote all
When you say "workers", do you mean taxpayers?

If you subscribe to the view that there should be no taxation without representation, is it not logical to argue that there should be no representation without taxation?

thinfourth2

Original Poster:

32,414 posts

234 months

Saturday 7th May 2011
quotequote all
[redacted]

Asterix

24,438 posts

258 months

Saturday 7th May 2011
quotequote all
Whatever Switzerland has.

thinfourth2

Original Poster:

32,414 posts

234 months

Saturday 7th May 2011
quotequote all
Mon Ami Mate said:
When you say "workers", do you mean taxpayers?

If you subscribe to the view that there should be no taxation without representation, is it not logical to argue that there should be no representation without taxation?
Everyone payes tax of some form, just some get money from breeding

cymtriks

4,561 posts

275 months

Saturday 7th May 2011
quotequote all
Three boxes ticked. Workers, Direct democracy and current system.

By "workers" I assume that means "people who pay in or have paid in for a minimum number of years but are currently retired or ill".

Direct democracy for important issues would be nice. Europe, , independence for UK regions, immigration, welfare reform, tax reform, spending cuts, funding for the NHS, etc. Three or four referendums a year. Politicians might actually be forced to take us seriously.

Proportional representation looks like a good idea until you see the reality. Countries that have it do not view their governments as being better, they aren't more engaged, what they vote for frequently gets negociated away in back room deals and the countries as a whole do not appear be any better off as a result of it.

GKP

15,099 posts

271 months

Saturday 7th May 2011
quotequote all
Asterix said:
Whatever Switzerland has.
Nazi gold?

thinfourth2

Original Poster:

32,414 posts

234 months

Saturday 7th May 2011
quotequote all
GKP said:
Asterix said:
Whatever Switzerland has.
Nazi gold?
Agressive chocolate?

Halb

53,012 posts

213 months

Saturday 7th May 2011
quotequote all
[redacted]