RE: CL63 And CL65 AMG Models Revealed
RE: CL63 And CL65 AMG Models Revealed
Monday 12th July 2010

CL63 And CL65 AMG Models Revealed

Leaked images show styling tweaks for facelifted uber-coupe



Hot on the heels of the official announcement of the revised Mercedes CL, these first images of new AMG tuned versions have turned up on the web.

As you might expect the AMG models get more aggressive looks to match their additional grunt, which sources elsewhere have quoted as 563bhp and 663lb ft from the twin-turbocharged V8 powered CL63, and 603bhp and 737lb ft from the (carried over) 6 litre V12.

As well as a black mesh grille, the cars get extended side skirts and quad exhaust trims - squared-off on the V8 powered car, and ovals on the V12.

The V12 also gets 20ins alloys against the V8's 19-inchers, and a few bits of extra chrome. More info will doubtless be revealed when these leaked images become 'official'...




 
Author
Discussion

goron59

Original Poster:

397 posts

189 months

Monday 12th July 2010
quotequote all
Good to see V12s still kicking around smile

kambites

69,988 posts

239 months

Monday 12th July 2010
quotequote all
Hmm. Not a great deal between the two engines, is there?

SVX

2,188 posts

229 months

Monday 12th July 2010
quotequote all
Lotto win car for me cloud9

adycav

7,615 posts

235 months

Monday 12th July 2010
quotequote all
You tend to get more luxury goodies on the '65 as standard too.

S3_Graham

12,830 posts

217 months

Monday 12th July 2010
quotequote all
if it was my money id rather this,


SVX

2,188 posts

229 months

Monday 12th July 2010
quotequote all
S3_Graham said:
if it was my money id rather this,

Could agree more, but you'd have to be prepared to catch the tin worm early...

Spiritual_Beggar

4,833 posts

212 months

Monday 12th July 2010
quotequote all
More pointless cars from Merc frown


Seriously, what is the point of a car that size, then only giving it 3 doors!? If you wanted a coupe, why get something that big!?

Merc, like BMW, have too many models IMO. They have models that seem to do exactly the same thing/ aimed at same market as other cars in their range.

Can somebody explain to me the need for the CL & E class model line?


Makes you wonder if the prices of these cars could be reduced by producing less models. Production costs would be less, allowing Mercedes to pass on that saving to the customers (lol....yeah right smile ).

gumsie

680 posts

227 months

Monday 12th July 2010
quotequote all
Spiritual_Beggar said:
More pointless cars from Merc frown


Seriously, what is the point of a car that size, then only giving it 3 doors!? If you wanted a coupe, why get something that big!?

Merc, like BMW, have too many models IMO. They have models that seem to do exactly the same thing/ aimed at same market as other cars in their range.

Can somebody explain to me the need for the CL & E class model line?


Makes you wonder if the prices of these cars could be reduced by producing less models. Production costs would be less, allowing Mercedes to pass on that saving to the customers (lol....yeah right smile ).
Any more pointless than the identical model in every niche line up from BMW, (X1, X3, X5, X6, 530dGT)? If you want a big luxurious car with an unspoiled flank you go for two doors, that's the point. Even CLS like cars look horrid with their extra doors to me. What is the point of not making ever car like a people carrier using your logic???
The V8 should be mine in 2016.


Edited by gumsie on Monday 12th July 12:20

JumpinJack

408 posts

196 months

Monday 12th July 2010
quotequote all
mmmm nice bit of kit! I wish they wouldn't show off new cars in that brown colour though... I'm not a fan, but that's just me.

pSyCoSiS

3,961 posts

223 months

Monday 12th July 2010
quotequote all
Love these big power houses - they sound awesome at full chat.

Lot of money though!

wildatheart

162 posts

197 months

Monday 12th July 2010
quotequote all
It looked better the way it was, in my opinion.



Edited by wildatheart on Monday 12th July 13:14

Ed.

2,175 posts

256 months

Monday 12th July 2010
quotequote all
wildatheart said:
It looked better the way it was, in my opinion.



Edited by wildatheart on Monday 12th July 13:14
+1 and 63 meant something.

DJC

23,563 posts

254 months

Monday 12th July 2010
quotequote all
Ed. said:
wildatheart said:
It looked better the way it was, in my opinion.



Edited by wildatheart on Monday 12th July 13:14
+1 and 63 meant something.
Er, no it didnt. If anything it meant "not the 65".

These updates are largely irrelevent anyway as this iteration of the CL follows the E in being *astoundingly* ugly, esp given the unfortunate nature of the previous models which were the best looking Mercs since the original 300SL.

Spiritual_Beggar

4,833 posts

212 months

Monday 12th July 2010
quotequote all
gumsie said:
What is the point of not making ever car like a people carrier using your logic???
No.

Why do people buy a big car like the CL or E class? I imagine it is for the extra space you get in the rear. You buy the bigger cars over the smaller ones (c Klass) because of the extra passenger space. So you then go buy a car that makes it impractical to have rear passengers, since the people in the front need to keep getting out everytime the people in the back want to get out.

That's what I don't understand. And also, still unanswered;

What is the point of a CL Klass AND an E Klass? Are they not aimed at the same market?


I'm quite aware that it's 'horses for courses', and people have different tastes, but with BMW and Merc it just seems that they have so many models that appear to do the same thing. I mean, it must cost a lot to create all those different ranges and production lines.

Ed.

2,175 posts

256 months

Monday 12th July 2010
quotequote all
DJC said:
Ed. said:
wildatheart said:
It looked better the way it was, in my opinion.



Edited by wildatheart on Monday 12th July 13:14
+1 and 63 meant something.
Er, no it didnt. If anything it meant "not the 65".

These updates are largely irrelevent anyway as this iteration of the CL follows the E in being *astoundingly* ugly, esp given the unfortunate nature of the previous models which were the best looking Mercs since the original 300SL.
Ok the 63 would have made more sense as 62 for the 6.2 V8 but it makes no sense as a 4.6 or larger twin turbo. If anything the 65 can be called the 600 since its a 6litre V12.

R666

183 posts

244 months

Monday 12th July 2010
quotequote all
Spiritual_Beggar said:
More pointless cars from Merc frown


Seriously, what is the point of a car that size, then only giving it 3 doors!? If you wanted a coupe, why get something that big!?

Merc, like BMW, have too many models IMO. They have models that seem to do exactly the same thing/ aimed at same market as other cars in their range.

Can somebody explain to me the need for the CL & E class model line?


Makes you wonder if the prices of these cars could be reduced by producing less models. Production costs would be less, allowing Mercedes to pass on that saving to the customers (lol....yeah right smile ).
Why bother to reduce costs when there are armies of people with serious cash who want to pay for the exact thing they want...?

qube_TA

8,405 posts

263 months

Monday 12th July 2010
quotequote all
rather have a Camaro, spend all that coin on a Merc and no-one would be able to tell it apart from any other Merc.


kambites

69,988 posts

239 months

Monday 12th July 2010
quotequote all
qube_TA said:
rather have a Camaro, spend all that coin on a Merc and no-one would be able to tell it apart from any other Merc.
I think that's half the point...

Luca Brasi

885 posts

192 months

Monday 12th July 2010
quotequote all
S3_Graham said:
if it was my money id rather this,

Amen. Absolutely brilliant looking cars.

bobberz

1,832 posts

217 months

Monday 12th July 2010
quotequote all
S3_Graham said:
if it was my money id rather this,

+1 Though I'm sure the new one is faster.
What happened to the nonsense about changing "CLK" to "E-class Coupe" and "CL" to "S-class Coupe", or is that only for America?
Mercs cars have gotten uglier, except for the C-class which I quite like. C63AMG = cloud9