High-class escorts.
Discussion
technodup said:
think they're sad desperate f
ks.
And for the record I have met a couple in social settings. One the stereotype bedsit crackwe, the other a 'milf' working out of hotels. Can't say I was impressed with either. And certainly couldn't see the attraction in forking out money to pump them.
You seem very angry.ks. And for the record I have met a couple in social settings. One the stereotype bedsit crackw
e, the other a 'milf' working out of hotels. Can't say I was impressed with either. And certainly couldn't see the attraction in forking out money to pump them. crofty1984 said:
You seem very angry.
I'm not, it doesn't affect me in the slightest. To me sucking cock for money is sucking cock for money. Doesn't matter which level of society you're doing it in.I find it pretty distasteful and I don't have a problem declaring it. I strongly suspect most of the more 'liberal' posters here would change their tune were it their wife or daughter in question and not some abstract on a website.
Not that I'll expect them to admit it.
PurpleMoonlight said:
ceebmoj said:
Forgive my innocence. What exactly is the law around this type of thing?
Prostitution is lawful.Soliciting is unlawful.
More than one prostitute working at the same location as the same time is unlawful.
Living off amoral earnings is unlawful (eg pimps).
ceebmoj said:
Thank you. Where do sights like http://www.pasha.co.uk/ stand? Are they not both soliciting and also presumably by taking a booking fee also living off amoral earnings?
Deemed advertising I believe.steveo3002 said:
i give them more credit trying to pay thier way than some of the scroungers that have never worked an give it away all day long for free
It could be argued that some of the council estate people I assume you refer to are in effect doing the same however they are producing children to continue the financial gain without having to have sex with strangers and the associated risks.PurpleMoonlight said:
ceebmoj said:
Forgive my innocence. What exactly is the law around this type of thing?
Prostitution is lawful.Soliciting is unlawful.
More than one prostitute working at the same location as the same time is unlawful.
Living off amoral earnings is unlawful (eg pimps).
danllama said:
Too many men with too much money. Too many women with too little self respect.
The world's fked.
It's the oldest profession.... the world has been this way for a very long time.The world's f
ked.I have zero issue with it - if a guy wants sex and wants to pay for it - and the girl is freely trading this, then why not?
technodup said:
'm not, it doesn't affect me in the slightest. To me sucking cock for money is sucking cock for money. Doesn't matter which level of society you're doing it in.
I find it pretty distasteful and I don't have a problem declaring it. I strongly suspect most of the more 'liberal' posters here would change their tune were it their wife or daughter in question and not some abstract on a website.
Not that I'll expect them to admit it.
I wouldn't want them to work in a abattoir or on the bins either.I find it pretty distasteful and I don't have a problem declaring it. I strongly suspect most of the more 'liberal' posters here would change their tune were it their wife or daughter in question and not some abstract on a website.
Not that I'll expect them to admit it.
PurpleMoonlight said:
ceebmoj said:
Thank you. Where do sights like http://www.pasha.co.uk/ stand? Are they not both soliciting and also presumably by taking a booking fee also living off amoral earnings?
Deemed advertising I believe.Gassing Station | The Lounge | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff