Pictures of decently Modified cars [Vol. 2]
Discussion
Don1 said:
obob said:
Yep, bonkers.
Yes, I have already said it's irrational, doesn't mean that I can't think like it. I'm sick to death of the scene, and for it to rebrand itself into one of taste doesn't work with me.I'm not talking about the scene rebranding itself as something of taste, I'm talking about the site in question, and from there you are correct. Having a visually-based memory can be a curse!
I've just realised, anyone of the scene disagreeing with me, I can call them 'haters'....
That'll be a red rag to the crowd.
I've just realised, anyone of the scene disagreeing with me, I can call them 'haters'....
That'll be a red rag to the crowd.I still think the tyre on the front looked stretched, it is possible it's just an effect of the contrast but the rim of the wheel looks too proud of the tyre to be fitted correctly. Also the weeds in the concrete, instagram style filter, graffiti in the background e.t.c. all make the shoot look cliched and detract from the car, IMO.


Digitalize said:
The tyres are almost absolute black like the arch, [s]you[/s]I cannot see them.
EFA, I said a few pages earlier that I liked the car apart from the wheels/tyres and now because it's been posted so many times the tired cliched way it has been photographed to fit in with the stanceworks house style is irritating as well.For those with poor screens

Strawman said:
Digitalize said:
The tyres are almost absolute black like the arch, [s]you[/s]I cannot see them.
EFA, I said a few pages earlier that I liked the car apart from the wheels/tyres and now because it's been posted so many times the tired cliched way it has been photographed to fit in with the stanceworks house style is irritating as well.For those with poor screens

Yeah I can see where the edge of the tyre is, but it doesn't look stretched to me, its the perspective I think. But we need a better photo to check.
Personally I don't like stretched tyres or the stupid massive camber thing.
From what I've seen on here from the "stancework" pictures I can't really see what the fuss is about.. take a 70s car, lower, put wheels on.. surely we've been doing this forever ?
Random pics, one or two are a bit naff, but the cars are great
This one is from dons hot rod page ( www.donshotrodpage.net ) always worth a look after a big californian show


Street rod of the year last year, built by Bobby Alloway:

I've got a thing for A pickups

'32, Coupe & 5 window



Personally I don't like stretched tyres or the stupid massive camber thing.
From what I've seen on here from the "stancework" pictures I can't really see what the fuss is about.. take a 70s car, lower, put wheels on.. surely we've been doing this forever ?
Random pics, one or two are a bit naff, but the cars are great

This one is from dons hot rod page ( www.donshotrodpage.net ) always worth a look after a big californian show


Street rod of the year last year, built by Bobby Alloway:

I've got a thing for A pickups

'32, Coupe & 5 window



Digitalize said:
You're brightness is way too high if you can see that, mines setup to be colour correct.
4So you agree I can see them and not as you said earlier "you can't see them". Amazingly I can vary the brightness of my display, I can do this independently of altering the colours shown as well, or did you mean your screen was brightness correct? Correct for what?
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Rover-100-with-420-GSI-2...
rear engined 2.0 turbo metro
someone got alot of fun for £600
rear engined 2.0 turbo metro

someone got alot of fun for £600





http://www.flickr.com/photos/benhosking/sets/72157...
Annoyingly no photos of the most important part.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff







