RE: Behold the 1,070hp, 12,000rpm V12 Nilu27
RE: Behold the 1,070hp, 12,000rpm V12 Nilu27
Author
Discussion

GTRene

20,564 posts

245 months

Wednesday 7th August 2024
quotequote all
I like it, it gives me a bit vibes of this sort Porsche 911-based Half11




DP14

373 posts

60 months

Wednesday 7th August 2024
quotequote all
Looks like a 90s concept car with 80s & 90s radio control/toy car influences.

These pictures even look like they were taken in the 90s with their lighting, angles and image quality:



Mr Tidy

28,778 posts

148 months

Wednesday 7th August 2024
quotequote all
I admire him for doing it, but the styling goes a bit missing on the rear.

I'd still prefer a GMA T33!

limpsfield

6,495 posts

274 months

Wednesday 7th August 2024
quotequote all
unsprung said:
It is petrol bacchanalia.
I am older now and have read a lot over the years, but the first time I have read those two words together!

f6box

237 posts

18 months

Thursday 8th August 2024
quotequote all
Chubbyross said:
On another note, it would be great to read that such and such designer has branched out on his/her/their own to create an interesting hatchback or vaguely affordable sports car.
Non starter on the hatchback thing. The investment required is orders of magnitude too much. You'd need to sell zillions to pay off the development, engineering, tooling up and manufacturing costs.

Ditto really the affordable sports car thing. The numbers don't come close to adding up, which is why you don't see any.

Anyway, hard to imagine this thing is actually going to get driven. 15 examples. How many of those will accrue even 10,000 miles over their lifespan? Will all 15 accrue 10,000 miles between them? Will it actually really work? Will you be able to get it fixed if it breaks in a few years? In reality, nobody will ever know, because it won't get driven.

Boring, slightly sour questions, but hard to take this seriously as a car. To appreciate the driving experience, the car has to be, you know, driven. If it's not driven, it's all academic.

Hope I'm wrong and a few people buy them for more than 150 miles a year driving like a tit around Monaco. But just can't see it.

username_checksout

354 posts

21 months

Thursday 8th August 2024
quotequote all
Still Mulling said:
Fantastic. And, "...hints of other marques...": really? You do the design team a disservice, Mr Bird!

However, this did spring to mind, the 1984 Peugeot Quasar:



Wishing the team every success!
Came here to post exactly that!

Wheel Turned Out

1,912 posts

59 months

Thursday 8th August 2024
quotequote all
It may sound odd, but with how bonkers the rest of it is I'm glad they opted for such a simple steering wheel. The temptation to hang a load of blinking LEDs and buttons off them is too many for some to resist.

Wadeski

8,790 posts

234 months

Thursday 8th August 2024
quotequote all
DP14 said:
Looks like a 90s concept car with 80s & 90s radio control/toy car influences.

These pictures even look like they were taken in the 90s with their lighting, angles and image quality:
I forgot how much 90s car media loved dutch angles. The "supercar parked on a small hill" shot was all the rave!

anonymous-user

75 months

Thursday 8th August 2024
quotequote all
Where the hell do you put numberplates? biggrin

Mouse Rat

2,007 posts

113 months

Thursday 8th August 2024
quotequote all
Fantastic poster car. love it

pycraft

1,221 posts

205 months

Thursday 8th August 2024
quotequote all
The only thing that bothers me is the NACA duct in front of the rear wheels, which looks like someone bodged the aero in simulations and had to fix brake cooling in the final prototype by adding an extra duct.

What bothers me even more is that when I look closely I can't even tell if it's a real NACA duct or painted on - it's just all black and there's no sense of 3-dimensionality. Which might mean it's a sticker added to make it look like the designers are less competent that them are; meaningless fussy addenda in some tribute to the 80s.

I'd still have one though.

DrEMa

1,401 posts

113 months

Thursday 8th August 2024
quotequote all
Looks a little ungainly from the front and back to me, side on looks great.

edoverheels

533 posts

126 months

Thursday 8th August 2024
quotequote all
Fantastic and doesn’t look enormous. A more flamboyant GMA

CH80

305 posts

18 months

Thursday 8th August 2024
quotequote all
The rev limiter is at 11k. Hmmm. Long live the V12!

smilo996

3,525 posts

191 months

Thursday 8th August 2024
quotequote all
It oddly looks a bit retro, 70's perhaps but also bang up to date. Love the interior. No problem with heat management. Just take the rear off.
Mad, bad and brilliant.

MrGeoff

742 posts

193 months

Thursday 8th August 2024
quotequote all
Slowlygettingit said:
I think that is pretty unique looking - not seeing any of the referenced manufacturers in those pictures. Maybe a Le Mans Porsche from directly behind but only in so much as half the car is gone and you see the mechanicals
Side profile reminds me a bit of the La Ferrari.

WPA

13,173 posts

135 months

Thursday 8th August 2024
quotequote all
No headlights and it looks like they stopped designing the car when they got to the rear.

Quickmoose

5,163 posts

144 months

Thursday 8th August 2024
quotequote all
I'm here for this.
retro futuristic.
Love the wheels, just not on this though.
Everything else is a vaguely contained beautiful engineered chaos.

Well done Nilu27, after Ineos started making SUVs, it was only a matter of time before a shampoo brand made a supercar.

pSyCoSiS

4,067 posts

226 months

Thursday 8th August 2024
quotequote all
What an animal.

I can see hints of the McLaren F1 in the second picture.

Great to see a proper, fire-breathing, naturally aspirated V12 being used for this.

Geoffcapes

1,059 posts

185 months

Thursday 8th August 2024
quotequote all
Bonkers. But in a good way.

The instrument binnacle needs some work, but the rest of the car looks cracking!

As mentioned, where are the headlights? And also could they get away with that much exposed rear wheel on the road?