45th President of the United States, Donald Trump. (Vol 5)
Discussion
Interesting
https://mobile.twitter.com/SenatorLeahy
We have discovered evidence that Judge Kavanaugh misled the Senate during his 2004 and 2006 hearings. Truthfulness under oath is not an optional qualification for a Supreme Court nominee. Watch as I question him here: (link: https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/nominati... judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/nomin…
https://mobile.twitter.com/SenatorLeahy
We have discovered evidence that Judge Kavanaugh misled the Senate during his 2004 and 2006 hearings. Truthfulness under oath is not an optional qualification for a Supreme Court nominee. Watch as I question him here: (link: https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/nominati... judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/nomin…
538 show it dropping also...
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approva...
Oh dear are out... Want to show me the poll which trump claimed he was 52% popular
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approva...
Oh dear are out... Want to show me the poll which trump claimed he was 52% popular
Byker28i said:
Interesting
https://mobile.twitter.com/SenatorLeahy
We have discovered evidence that Judge Kavanaugh misled the Senate during his 2004 and 2006 hearings. Truthfulness under oath is not an optional qualification for a Supreme Court nominee. Watch as I question him here: (link: https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/nominati... judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/nomin…
He'll still be sworn in though.https://mobile.twitter.com/SenatorLeahy
We have discovered evidence that Judge Kavanaugh misled the Senate during his 2004 and 2006 hearings. Truthfulness under oath is not an optional qualification for a Supreme Court nominee. Watch as I question him here: (link: https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/nominati... judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/nomin…
Nanook said:
I agree, and I think it would be best if we leave what other people suppose my beliefs and leanings are out of it and get back to the topic?
One last thing though, for clarification, as I feel there's some misunderstanding, I'm not saying Woodward is lying. All I'm saying is, we don't know what the truth here is.
You can probably all have a good guess, most of you may well be correct, but this idea that "Trump has lied before, that constitutes evidence" is too stupid even for this thread, and hopefully we'll get the facts. Hopefully as a recording, hopefully dropped right at the ideal moment before the midterms, although even then, other than another couple of people fired by Trump, I don't know what difference it'll really make.
Surely it's not that he's lied before but the sheer volume and consistency of the lies?One last thing though, for clarification, as I feel there's some misunderstanding, I'm not saying Woodward is lying. All I'm saying is, we don't know what the truth here is.
You can probably all have a good guess, most of you may well be correct, but this idea that "Trump has lied before, that constitutes evidence" is too stupid even for this thread, and hopefully we'll get the facts. Hopefully as a recording, hopefully dropped right at the ideal moment before the midterms, although even then, other than another couple of people fired by Trump, I don't know what difference it'll really make.
He lies every day about everything and quite clearly lives in his own imaginary world of self delusion that he's the best at everything and everyone either does or at least should love him and thank him (much like Kim Jong Un) for everything he's done for them.
If he told one lie that was off base and he owned up to it and admitted it then yeah, it'd be enough to say that's not evidential proof but we have evidential proof that he'll lie his arse off about everything to make the narrative portray him as amazing and then double down on the lie when presented with the evidence that what he said isn't even remotely true.
His personality traits are the most impossibly transparent and simple in the world to comment on and be proven correct, he's the most open book on the planet. It's part of why his supporters think he's so great and part of why we all fear the damage he can do. Everything he does is predictable and if you only see the worst in him which is easy to do, then it's awful watching it play out exactly like you thought it would every single time. You don't need to be a fully qualified psychologist/therapist/behaviourist/counsellor to understand exactly who Trump is and use that to accurately predict how he'll react to anything in the future.
And It's not just that he's wrong, it's that he's REALLY wrong, all of the time, about everything. And he's running the most powerful country in the world with the most influence over everything with the sole purpose of enriching himself.
Edited by F1GTRUeno on Thursday 6th September 02:08
Ructions said:
RobDickinson said:
TREASON?
Quite donny boy, you've figured it out..
What if the Senior Administration Official is Melania?Quite donny boy, you've figured it out..
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
Does the so-called “Senior Administration Official” really exist, or is it just the Failing New York Times with another phony source? If the GUTLESS anonymous person does indeed exist, the Times must, for National Security purposes, turn him/her over to government at once!
The Op-Ed writer used the relatively uncommon word lodestar in their piece.
Hmm...
https://twitter.com/davidmackau/status/10374579036...
(just relaying an amusing bit of speculation before anyone suggests I'm taking this seriously)
Hmm...
https://twitter.com/davidmackau/status/10374579036...
(just relaying an amusing bit of speculation before anyone suggests I'm taking this seriously)
Byker28i said:
He's lost it...turn them over at once?
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
Does the so-called “Senior Administration Official” really exist, or is it just the Failing New York Times with another phony source? If the GUTLESS anonymous person does indeed exist, the Times must, for National Security purposes, turn him/her over to government at once!
It's hard to know where to begin.Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
Does the so-called “Senior Administration Official” really exist, or is it just the Failing New York Times with another phony source? If the GUTLESS anonymous person does indeed exist, the Times must, for National Security purposes, turn him/her over to government at once!
I was going to go with:-
President John Barron getting upset about speaking to the press "anonymously"...
But
President Bonespurs capitalising the word GUTLESS.
Won the day...
minimoog said:
The Op-Ed writer used the relatively uncommon word lodestar in their piece.
Hmm...
https://twitter.com/davidmackau/status/10374579036...
(just relaying an amusing bit of speculation before anyone suggests I'm taking this seriously)
That would hysterical if Pence wasn't so scary in his own views.Hmm...
https://twitter.com/davidmackau/status/10374579036...
(just relaying an amusing bit of speculation before anyone suggests I'm taking this seriously)
A sociopath stabbing a narcissist in the back, who would have thought it possible.
Kamala Harris
https://t.co/qVsBVwNEP5https://twitter.com/SenKamalaHarris/status/1037382...
I like her!!
https://t.co/qVsBVwNEP5https://twitter.com/SenKamalaHarris/status/1037382...
I like her!!
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff